Preview

How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Invade Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
934 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Invade Russia
Every person has heard of Napoleon Bonaparte one way or another. Of everything he has done he is most notable for his invasion of Russia. In the history of the world three people have tried to invade Russia according to Bell from History.com who said, ”Charles XII tried it, Napoleon tried it, Hitler tried it, It never seems to work out invading Russia.” (www.history.com/news/napoleons-disastrous-invasion-of-russai-200-years-ago) As can be seen invading Russia does not seem to work, but in our case of Napoleon was this the beginning of his end. Napoleon's invasion of Russia has been known as the greatest military blunder in history, but was this truly all it took to turn the war around for Britain and their allies? Napoleon is believed to …show more content…
In the night a terrible winter storm hit the town killing many of Napoleon's men and freezing others beyond fighting condition. Napoleon soon found another problem, for in his haste for a early victory he underestimated how much food 600,000 soldiers, and 250,000 horses would eat, and how far they would have to go. “Supposing the magazines are 50 miles in the rear, and that each horse goes 100 miles per week, it would require for transport of ‘food only’ for the army 112,000 extra horses. … Oats at 8 lbs per day for each horse totals 9,799,356 lbs per week, making a grand total of 44,332,264 lbs per week.” (Morris https://battlefieldanomalies.com/1812-2/) This lead to Napoleon's men having less than two weeks rationed food. Russia's defence unknowingly plaid this to their advantage by burning crops as they retreated to prevent his army from getting supplies. All this lead up to the battle of Borodino 75 miles outside of Moscow. “Indeed he was advised… decided on a straightforward frontal attack.” After the victories but costly battle of Borodino Napoleon found himself deep and Russia and heavily outnumbered. Napoleon finally made the decision to abandon the invasion and return to France. The retreat slowly brook more and more of his army apart until there less than 1/20 the original army size. “By the time Napoleon abandoned his army to its fate in Poland… it …show more content…
In the meeting they suggested Napoleon relinquish his title as emperor of France and take responsibility so France would not be blamed for the war. In the treaty that followed Napoleon was banished to the island of Elba of of Italy, and was given a two million Frank salary from France. This was not enough for the once mighty emperor of France as within the next two years he built up supporters back in France. Finally in 1815 he made one last stand for greatness when he overthrew the current French monarchy and reistilled himself. The forces

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    12. Britain, Russia, and Austria defeat Napoleon and take Paris in 1813. What is Napoleon’s fate in 1814?…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Napoleon the kingmaker." History Today, vol. 48, no. 3, 1998, p. 39+. Biography in Context,…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte Quotes

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte is one of history’s greatest military commanders. Napoleon was a French military general and political leader, who grew famous and important during the French Revolution. He became the first emperor of France, serving from 1804 until 1814, and again in 1815, and his motive for military expansion changed the world. Napoleon changed military organization and training, and reorganized France’s education system. He is one of the most celebrated leaders in history, and is one of the most important people in modern world history.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mikhail Kutuzov, was the leading of the Russian army against the Grande Armee, was well versed with Napoleon’s most victorious method of winning a quick and decisive battle: living off of the land. Tactics that General Kutuzov employed contributed greatly to the failure of the French army in her campaign. Bonaparte relied on his troops to scavenge for resources along the…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He may have won the battle but the loss of is soldiers were significant; “Perhaps only 100,000 of the original 600,000 survived their ordeal” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 598). He underestimated the Russian peoples resolve to surrender Moscow, the retreating Russian army set fire to the land, depriving Napoleon’s army of any food, fuel, and housing (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 598), greatly crippling his army. This invasion culminated in the European coalition, with the countries working together, Napoleon was defeated and exiled to the island of…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon had a choice, he didn't have to tempt to invade Russia, he could have just let it be. Alexander I and Napoleon were allies, in my opinion, he wasn't in control of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland so honestly, why did he care if Russia stopped selling grain to them. Also, just because they both wanted to take over Poland doesn't mean he needed to invade Russia. In June of 1812, Napoleon and the French army marched to Russia, as Napoleon got further Alexander made his troops hold back, he didn't want to be pulled into a unfair battle.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Several historians have similar beliefs as to why the Russians managed to defeat Napoleon. However, different historians place more weight to some reasons than others. In this essay I will present the viewpoints of three different historians, Lefebvre, Thompson, and Connelly, and discuss what they argue are the chief reasons for the defeat of Napoleon. This essay will also present the viewpoints of a Napoleonic foot soldier and compare and contrast the viewpoints of the Napoleonic foot soldier to that of the historians. After examining the three different historians viewpoints and comparing them to the viewpoint of the Napoleonic foot soldier, I argue that the Russians managed to defeat Napoleon's grand army during the Russian campaign of 1812 because the Russians repeatedly retreated deeper into Russia and because of the harsh conditions of the Russian winter.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Understanding the Battle of Waterloo is important to know, because it shows that bad decision making and bad intelligence reporting can lead to one's defeat. Since 1804, Napoleon was trying to create his own empire over Europe. He was defeated in 1805 by the British, but he continued to move forward across Europe before being forced to surrender. He returned to Paris in March 1815, prompting Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria to declare war. Napoleon invaded Belgium in June, attempting to take over Brussels. He sent his men to engage Wellington, also sending a battalion against General Blucher's Prussian army. Blucher decided to retreat as Wellington's army wasn't holding the front line against Napoleon's army. A decisive battle is now set…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon's once unequaled army was now diminishing. After defeats in Spain and misfortune in Russia, countries began to realize that Napoleon's "invincible" reputation was tainted. For the first time people saw that this "unstoppable" general could, in fact, be stopped. Momentum and hope were gained by all of Napoleon's enemies. In 1813, Napoleon was in his German campaign. However, because of the Peninsular war, he was unable to send troops causing them to be 200,000 troops short. This created even more casualties and death for Napoleon, as he could just stand and watch his empire fall. Even more enemies were gathering against Napoleon, sensing his newfound weakness. Austria, Britain, Russia, Prussia and Sweden all joined forces to fight against Napoleon. Napoleon's forces were now by far outnumbered by this new alliance and he was barely holding on. Eventually, the allies would attack Paris and take the city. When Napoleon returned and heard of the defeat he knew it was the end. Finally realizing that his unstoppable armies had been stopped for good he abdicated on April 11th, 1814. The Peninsular War has helped diminish Napoleon's armies and expose his weaknesses. His enemies had finally caught on and in the end it was the great Napoleon who finally gave…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The withdrawal of the Russian army “[prompted] the citizens of Moscow to [begin] a massive and panicked exodus” (Geographia). When Napoleon arrived, he found the city to be empty of people and lacking in supplies. What made things worse was that during that night, “fires broke out in the city and by the next day the French were lacking shelter as well” (Geographia). Napoleon decided to wait in Moscow for Alexander to surrender, but after a month of no surrender, Napoleon decided to retreat. Sadly it was too late as Napoleon had over stayed his welcome in Moscow and Russia’s cruel winter had set…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Campaign of 1812 should have been a another crusade for Napoleon, but he now faced 2 new policies that he had never faced before, the severe Russian winter and the notorious scorched-earth policy. On June 23, 1812 Napoleon's Grande Armee, over 500,000 men strong, poured over the Russian border. An equal amount of Russian forces awaited them. The result of the campaign was a surprise. Two authors, General carl von Clausewitz and Brett James, show similarities in reasons why Napoleon had lost this campaign to Russia.<br><br>Napoleon believed that after a few quick victorious battles, he could convince Alexander to return to the Continental System. He also decided that if he occupied Moscow, the Russian government would crumple and ask for…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon Hero or Villian?

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon, the great French leader, is often seen as a hero, but if you look closer there is great evidence showing that he is a villain. He seemed to try to improve the country greatly, but really he was just trying to improve his reputation, a very selfish thing to do. For example he adopted a set of laws called the Napoleonic Code. These laws were put in place to give the country a uniform set of rules and eliminate many injustices, but really these limited individual freedoms, something that was greatly stressed before during the early stages of the revolution. It took away the freedom of speech, press, and restored slavery. I don’t believe that Napoleon had the people in mind when he made these laws; I think he wrote them to keep the people under control so he could rule them with less effort and (again) improve his reputation. If a leader rules without any uproar from the citizens then he must be the most brilliant, heroic ruler ever, right? This is exactly what I thought his intentions were. Though a very smart idea this was, it was morally wrong and unjust. In addition Napoleon tried to put other countries against each other. For example in 1803 after he failed the Saint Domingue expedition he sold the Louisiana territory to the United States. His reason was to “punish the British, the sale assures the forever power of the United States, and I have given England a rival that will, sooner or later, humble their pride.” I think he choose to do this so that when all the other powerful countries were fighting he could rise to the occasion and “take over the world.” Not a very heroic thing to do… Finally Napoleon manipulated other people to get what he wanted. In a way he brainwashed them. He created a huge empire that he could barely sustain so he had to threaten the leaders, from countries like Portugal, Prussia, and Sweden, with military actions. This was kind-of cowardly. Clearly…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June of 1812, Napoleon began his deadly Russian campaign, a landmark in the history of the caustic potential of warfare. All mainland Europe was under his control, and the invasion of Russia was an effort to force Tsar Alexander planned once again to the terms of a treaty that Napoleon had enforced upon him four years earlier. Having collected nearly half a million soldiers, from France as well as all of the states of Europe, Napoleon entered Russia at the lead of the largest army ever seen. The Russians, under the power of Marshal Kutuzov, could not hope to defeat him in a direct conflict.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, it also allowed him to continue fighting when he should have surrendered. Napoleon was a skilled general and in the beginning of his career, conquered most of central Europe. Despite his extreme talent in battle, eventually the Allies-- Russia, Austria, Prussia, and Britain--beat Napoleon at the Battle of Leipzig in 1813. After his defeat, the Allies exiled Napoleon to the island of Elba, but he did not stay there long. He soon came back to France to try to restore his reputation and regain power during what is now known as The Hundred Days. This was a mistake as he is defeated again and exiled once more to St. Helena. Napoleon’s determination to climb the ranks and improve once he was at the top made him an extremely successful and notable general, arguably one of the best in history. Without his determination, he would never have had control over most of central Europe. However, it was his determination that brought him into battles that he had no chance of winning. He was too determined to win that he was blind to the fact that continuing to fight would be worse than surrendering. His excessive determination allowed him to make the mistake of returning to France after he was exiled and fight again during The Hundred Days, which only led to him being exiled once more to the island of St. Helena, where he would die six years…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper is the rough draft version. There are grammatical errors and other such errors in it.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays