Preview

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Create Compromises

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Articles Of Confederation Create Compromises
Soon after the Articles of Confederation had gone into action, the leaders realized that it may not have been the best plan if they wanted to become a successful country. They began to form a new constitution with multiple changes; however, they first had to create compromises so that both the small as well as large states would be pleased with their new system. These compromises include the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the compromise over commerce, all leading to a stronger country. With the Articles of Confederation, each state, no matter what size, got one vote when making important decisions. The delegates from large states were opposed to this idea and felt that they should have more votes since they had a larger population. If the votes were relative to the population, then the people in the larger states would have more say than if there is only one vote per state. The delegates from smaller states liked having one vote because they believed they were …show more content…
Southern states had a plethora of slaves while the northern states had little to none. Virginia was one of the southern states and they fully insisted on having them count towards the total population because at the time their slave population reached almost 300,000. Massachusetts a northern state was on the complete other end with zero slaves total due to their anti-slave policy so they felt it would be incredibly unfair to count slaves towards total population. To balance out both the states that had excess amounts of slaves, and no slaves at all, the Three-Fifths Compromise was formed. This compromise stated that only three-fifths of a state's slave population would be taken into consider for the total state population. Although this seems like a small compromise it still helped in allowing the delegates to quickly get the new Constitution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One major flaw in the Articles of Confederation was that the state governments were given much more power than the central government. For example, the Confederation Congress could not levy taxes without approval of the states. They could only present their ideas to the states, hoping to reach an agreement. When the central government requested a tariff on imported items, the state of Rhode Island refused to pay. This inefficient method of funding resulted in inflation and overall lack of money for the central government. To make an amendment in the Articles of Confederation, all thirteen states had to agree. Although this weak central government was thought of as ineffective in governing the states, it provided equal rights for every state. Each state had the same amount of power, allowing a small state with few people to have the ability to cancel the vote of another state. Many of the states had conflicting views, resulting in large struggles over the amendment of laws. The Articles of Confederation was very effective in supporting small, minority states like Rhode…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slaves where there were exceptions with the wealthiest slave nation in the Americas, men tended to field work and women worked on the cotton gin. There is a new idea of the role of men and women and the relationship between black and white men. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 made sure that new states developed in the west would be able to claim full statehood once their population reached the lowest population of older states. Jefferson, American Founding Father wanted to spread ideas around with the opposition of the continuity of the republic. The three fifth's compromise in 1787 determined that each slave should be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of taxation and representation in the state. This agreement allowed unequal…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each state according to population got a number of representatives (each state had at least one representative), and two senators. This is what caused the big states v. small states issue. Why was this an issue? Well the large states obviously would have been happier with their representation in the House like, Virginia. “Representatives…shall be appointed…according to……

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyze how the U.S. Constitution overcame the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation The article of confederation was intended to create weak federal government; it prompted many issues that inevitably needed to be addressed by the government. That lead to a meeting where the new pan of government called the constitution was writ. Once created, that constitution with time resolve some of the issues that under the article of confederation. One thing the constitutional did was to give the leader of the government the power to manage fund issue.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a perfect world, this would lead to effective representation for each state. Normally a bicameral congress issues an abundant say to both houses in deciding laws. Furthermore, the founders vied for this in efforts to smother and hinder any sort of dictatorships on U.S. soil.” Larger states wanted representation purely by population. Smaller states did not appreciate that method, because they felt it lessened their say. They would have minimal say in national government, and fewer representatives. A compromise was eventually agreed on every state would have two representatives in the Senate and have representatives based on population (the house).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theme: Compromise on a number of important issues was required in order to create the new federal Constitution. Adopting the new document required great political skill and involved changing the ratification process defined in the Articles of Confederation, writing persuasively in support of the stronger central government, and promising to add amendments to protect individual liberty and states' rights.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a consequence of 25 of the 55 convention delegates being slave owners, whether or not slaves should be counted into the state population was up for debate. Following the Great Compromise, the three-fifths compromise was created in order to allow southern states to count each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person. This extra boost in population gave states such as Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina - where a large percentage of their population was slaves - more representation in the House of Representatives so that neither the northern or southern states fully got their way. Another indirect compromise between the Southern and Northern states and the framers of the constitution was the agreement to not allow the word “slave” to be written directly into the constitution. The inclusion of slavery into their constitution would be contradictory to their political ideas of the American Revolution of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Fifths Compromise made it fair for all involved or so the states would want us to believe such nonsense. The population numbers detremine the taxes as well the representation of each state. Who would be counted as population in the census became a big debate among the states.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A compromise that was made was the Great Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement that small and large states made. This compromise stated the representation and legislative structure each state should have under the U.S. Constitution. The outcome of the Great Compromise was that each state would have two representatives in the upper house.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Revolution of 1776, America had to transition itself from thirteen disjointed colonies to one unified nation. In 1777, the Articles of Confederation was drafted and submitted for the states’ approval. Out of thirteen states, only eight ratified the plan for a national government by 1778, while nearly three more years passed before the last state approved the Articles (Soomo Publications, 2015). Although the Articles of Confederation provided a system for the Continental Congress to direct the Revolutionary War, Congress felt the need for a stronger union with enough power to defeat Great Britain. The belief that a constitutional order must be fitting to its republican character was met with the fear of a central authority (HistoryEd, 2009). Such a fear may have potentially devastated the ability to adequately serve a considerable union like the United States. In response to this fear, Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton published essays in hopes of swaying the public opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution. The Federalist Papers are a collection of eighty-five articles written by Hamilton, as well as James Madison and John Jay, promoted ratifying the Constitution in hopes of creating a resilient, centralized government (Lutz, 1990). After months of deliberation at the Constitutional Convention in Pennsylvania, a Constitution was ratified and agreed upon by the states.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Three-Fifth clause is a compromise that said for every five slaves, three of them would count towards the state’s population. The Three-Fifth clause conference was held at the United States Constitutional Convention in the year 1787 and was enforced in states that allowed slavery. The reason for the Three-Fifth clause is because the states had to figure out a system of representation and didn’t know how to count the slaves. The Northern states didn’t want the slaves to be counted towards the population because the slaves were seen as property in the Southern states and the Northern states were concerned that if the Southern states had too many representatives, they would be able to out vote the North on many issues including slavery and…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays