Preview

How Did The South Respond To The Abolitionist Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The South Respond To The Abolitionist Movement
Blake Rose Mrs. Farkas English 8 3 May 2024 How the South Responded to the Abolitionist Movement

The abolitionist movement freed four million African Americans from slavery in the United States. People in the South opposed the abolitionists and did many things to counter the movement. Abolitionists are people who would protest the law of being able to own slaves. Most Southern people were in slavery, which set the two sides into an endless battle. The argument of slavery led to the South leaving the Union to form the Confederacy. The Union and the Confederacy disagreed on many important political topics that led to the civil war. The south countered the work of the abolitionist movement by being violent, destroying media, and justifying slavery.
…show more content…
Slave owners were savage to the abolitionists. The abolitionists had their books incinerated, their lives threatened, and their printing presses destroyed. The abolitionists have surged the problem of slavery to a new high. (Library of Congress) Many times across the United States people would be injured or killed by people in the south making an attempt to convey their pro slavery opinion to the rest of the country. People in the South would destroy the media showcasing abolitionism. In many pro-slavery states there would be people protesting slavery and showcasing the flaws of it. Elijiah Lovejoy began writing an anti-slavery newspaper in 1833. He then moved to Illinois. Even though it was considered a free state, most people in the state had pro-slavery opinions. When the word of his newspaper spread throughout the city, a group of people got together and formed a mob to destroy his printing press. After the event, the city replaced the printing press but gave him a very authoritarian warning to stop making his newspaper. He then ignored them and the events of his press were destroyed three more times. After that he …show more content…
Local governments in pro-slavery states would attempt to suppress abolitionist media. They would do this, along with many other things, to discredit the abolitionist movement. People that agreed with slavery often justify it in many ways. One of the main ways that Christian slaveholders would justify owning slaves is that they would pick a certain bible verse or an excerpt from a bible story and say that it is okay for them to have slaves. Their main argument for it is because a character in the bible owned slaves. “The verse eventually became the foundational text for those who wanted to justify slavery” (Rae) Another way that slaveholders would justify owning slaves is by saying that without owning slaves they would go bankrupt. While in some instances this statement might be true, abolitionists argued that it was wrong to lean on the work of unpaid laborers to keep their financial state afloat. Slave-owners also argued that the slaves' payment was the food (even if it was minimal) and the shelter that they provided. People in the South would destroy the media showcasing abolitionism. People that agreed with slavery were often violent towards abolitionists and would injure or even kill abolitionists. People that agreed with slavery would often justify it by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When it came down to religion, some slave owners didn’t want their slaves to practice such things in fear that the slaves would be moved in a way to overthrow their power. Severe slave codes were established to deter slaves from doing certain things but it didn’t always work out. Though owners had forbidden religion on their plantations, slaves often had secret meetings whether it was at night or when they felt the master or overseer wasn’t looking. This included sermons by slaved and even ex-slaved men, freedom hymns, and other forms. Slaves believed that God would deliver them from bondage and that they would be reunited with their family. On the other hand, some slave owners encouraged the practice of religion as long as it was under their watch and their rules and regulations. Slave owners would have a building solely for preaching and they would appoint a white minister to allude to the idea that the slave owners were “Gods” and that as slaves; they should look up to, respect, and serve them. Blacks were not allowed to pick up any books because slave owners were afraid that they would learn how to read. Religion restrictions were only the start of the “Troublesome Property” observation.…

    • 809 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery took a hard hit in the 1830’s as Abolitionists began to harshly criticize the institution of slavery. There was also a few slave rebellions that ultimately failed that scared slave owners and other southerners. To combat this rough criticism and rebellion southern evangelicals interpreted the Bible as being literal and began to use certain verses to support slavery. “They pointed out, for example, that the patriarchs of Israel had owned slaves. Slavery had been practiced throughout the Roman world at the time of Christ, they noted, and the apostles had urged obedience to all secular laws, including those governing slavery.” (The American Journey Ch.11 Pg. 301) Ironically Northern evangelicals used the Bible to argue that slavery was…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abolitionists were doing the same thing - just fighting for the people who couldn’t fight for themselves. Take Garrison for example. In his account, he is talking about slaves as actual people, in one line saying that because they are men, he is “but am bound, by every principle of honor, by all the claims of human nature, by obedience to Almighty God, to "remember them that are in bonds as bound with them," and to demand their immediate and unconditional emancipation.” From this, and all of Garrison’s account starting from the line “If the slaves are not men; if they do not possess human instincts, passions, faculties, and powers…” and ending with “demand their immediate and unconditional emancipation,”we see that the people of that period, even though the slaves had thoughts and feelings, just the same as them, were not human. They were beasts, animals that were…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading many accounts from slaves and comparing them to the stories of the rich white folk of the same era, we can see that the true fanatics were indeed the Southerners who supported slavery. Many of the arguments put forth by credible slaveholders proved to be full of logical fallacies and completely void of any truth based on the reports from slaves.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Weld took approach of religious righteousness, and that the only way to proceed was to have immediate elimination or slavery now. While many other abolitionists believed that gradual emancipation and colonization was a better way to slowly phase out slavery. They believed by freeing the slaves that they could join the workforce and then be able to fend for themselves. The abolitionists proclaimed that personal freedom derived not from the ownership of productive property like land but from ownership of one’s self and the ability to enjoy the fruits of one’s labor. While the movement was to abolish slavery. Even though the abolitionists were mostly from the north, there were some northerners that the slaves should be freed, many believed that even though they were free that they did not have the right…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The danger for the economic interests of the southern states was presaged by the abolitionist movement. The economy of Southern states was based on the plantation system of cotton and tobacco, supported by slave labor. All the wealth of this part of the United States was produced thanks to slavery. As result, the economy and politics were dominated by the Aryan race in the South. Therefore, residents of the South didn’t dispute the use of slaves to maintain and increase their wealth and power.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the biggest reason was the reliance of the southern economy on slave labor. The pro-slavery movement never ran out of excuses to keep oppressing black people. Anti-abolitionists believed at the time that black people could simply not live as free people, they had mischievous and destructive character. Slave owners believed that black people didn't have morals.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Abolitionist Movement: the American Revolution vs. the Civil War How do you imagine the days before the abolition of slavery? Do you imagine someone shouting “Let my people go,” while parting a sea filled with hope of escape? Do you imagine chains and bondage? Do you imagine years of sorrow at the hands of someone you don’t even know?…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals who owned slaves argued that “slavery had existed throughout history and was the natural state of mankind.” (ushistroy.org) The argument was also used that “slavery was a necessary evil because it would control the sinful, less humane, black race.” In addition, they believed “the institution [slavery] was divine, and...brought Christianity to the heathen”. After all, “African societies and cultures were unskilled, uneducated and savage.”…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abolitionists of the North argued against slavery by presenting moral arguments against it and bringing more attention to the cruelty of the issue. However, Southerners defended slavery by stating that slavery was mentioned numerous times in the Bible. As the Christian belief in unity of the human race, Abolitionists believed that their attacks on slavery were “a vindication of Christianity, moral accountability, and the unity of mankind” (Davis 130). Some Northerners argued that “slavery was sinful in itself” (Margaret 164). Many writings attempted to show the harsh conditions of slavery to bring attention to the issue.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That is partially why the southern states wished for slavery to be legal. Many people in the Union states had no use for slaves, so had no reason to want them to be legal, as their economy was more business and manufacturing based. In addition, the Union states felt, in general, that it was demeaning to keep other human beings as…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An element in the creation of a united southern solidarity, was the shaping of a struggle with anti-slavery and slavery factions into a conflict of southern interests vs. northern interests. Leading up the eventual war, abolitionists provided the perfect foundation for this argument. Promoting the idea that abolitionists were taking “control of the pulpit, of the schools… and the press,” in the 1830s Calhoun and other southern radicals wanted to frame the North as wholly abolitionist, to “engineer proslavery solidarity.” (118) Although this was far from the truth, this narrative would continue to resurface until the eventual birth of the confederacy.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antislavery movement was led by abolitionists of both races and genders who hoped to emancipate all slaves and end racial discrimination in the United States. Such a task required these individuals to work together and employ different methods for spreading their ideas and reaching the people. As many abolitionists became disappointed with the progress of the movement, many began to change their methods and policies, which caused a split in the abolitionist movement.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I am Samuel Adams, a slave holder, and a large plantation owner. I feel that I can speak for all the plantation owners in the South and say that we feel that there is nothing wrong with slavery. Being a slave owner for all 45 years of my life I have seen my plantation grow and the United States economy get more and more dependant on cotton from my plantation. Over the past 40 years the ability for me to buy slaves at auctions has made me capable of doubling by plantation size. Now I own 100 slaves, all either working the cotton gin or picking cotton in the fields. These slaves have made me and many other plantation owners in the South rich. They have also promoted westward expansion for many of my buddies. My friend James Swanson just bought a plantation out in the West easily twice the size of his plantation here in Georgia. He was able to do this because of the large amount of slaves that he has. Here in the South we provide slaves with food, clothing, and shelter; something that is not provided to the blacks in the North. Slaves are better off in the South because they have a place to live, and they have food to eat. Abolitionists have been trying to free our slaves but they have no right to do this. Owning slaves is a god given right and the Bible justifies it. It has been around for thousands of years. Slaves are not only important to the South they are needed to keep the American economy strong.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Torn between the economic benefits of slavery and the moral and constitutional issues it raised, white Southerners grew more and more defensive of the institution. They argued that black people, like children, were incapable of caring for themselves and that slavery was a benevolent institution that kept them fed, clothed, and…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays