Preview

The Role Of Social Stratification In Southern Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
732 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Social Stratification In Southern Society
Political Culture and the social stratification in southern society created a solidarity among Southerners. Southern unity was hinged on the similarity between their ideals in government and the ways they viewed their society. Yet, as evidenced by the nullification crisis during the Jackson Administration, South Carolina failed to turn the gears toward secession. Although passionately pro slavery, and content with status-quo in their plantation society, staunch disunionists failed to convince the southern majority of the practicality of nullification. Even as late as the Nashville Convention in 1850, Southern politicians couldn’t gain unanimous support in leaving the union. (224) Instead, many southerners preferred the of compromise. Ultimately, …show more content…
An element in the creation of a united southern solidarity, was the shaping of a struggle with anti-slavery and slavery factions into a conflict of southern interests vs. northern interests. Leading up the eventual war, abolitionists provided the perfect foundation for this argument. Promoting the idea that abolitionists were taking “control of the pulpit, of the schools… and the press,” in the 1830s Calhoun and other southern radicals wanted to frame the North as wholly abolitionist, to “engineer proslavery solidarity.” (118) Although this was far from the truth, this narrative would continue to resurface until the eventual birth of the confederacy. Eventually, by 1850, many southern voters elected politicians more inclined to take on the “abolitionist” North. This was evidenced in a North Carolina congressman Thomas L. Clingman. In 1845, he waged a campaign as a pragmatic Southern Whig, who was labeled soft, running as a moderate. He would learn from this mistake, and would run again in …show more content…
Early in the 19th century churches began to divide on the principle of slavery. (108) Southern churches “rallied” in the defense of slavery. Ministries compared the idea of abolition with “heresy.” Furthermore, Southern churches found justification in biblical verses. (109) This led to, for Presbyterians, a division between and “Old” and “New School.” While New School Presbyterianism “promoted…man’s own agency to overcome sin,” the Old School concentrated in the South maintained the New School was “poisonous.” This idea of sectional divide fed the forces of southern solidarity and helped propel the southern states that much closer to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DVORAK, KATHARINE L. “After Apocalypse, Moses.” Masters and Slaves in the House of the Lord: Race and Religion in the American South, 1740-1870, edited by John B. Boles, 1st ed., University Press of Kentucky, 1988, pp. 173–191. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt130hss4.11. Katherine Dvorak discusses an important difference in the body of the Christian church before and after the Civil War. More specifically, the fact that before the civil war free slaves and negroes would worship alongside their white counterpart, albeit sitting in different pews, but the same blood of Christ and the same rituals. Katherine Dvorak makes it clear that we do not know the true reason behind the racial separation of the church but does provide evidence for multiple possibilities. Immediately after the civil war, attention then changes to be more specific in the operations and power structures of the newly racially segregated black…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southerns believed that they had no choice but to separate from the Union. The South was isolated from the North politically, economically, and socially. They no longer felt any strong bond or connection to the northerners. They saw their way of life beginning to crumble all around them, climaxing in the elections of 1860. Lincoln's election was the straw that broke the camel's back, and the southern states decided to secede. This probably would have been almost impossible to prevent. Douglas came closest with his doctrine of popular sovereignty. Under this system, slavery could flourish or be abolished: it was up to the people in the states to decide. However, this idea didn't work because neither side was willing to compromise on so important…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These actions underscored the ideological strength of the Radical Republicans in control of Congress, who continued Lincoln’s belief that American prosperity depended on a strong national government safeguarding equality. However, as early as 1865, some within the party began suggesting that using coercion wasn’t necessary to get the South to recognize the rights of Free Blacks (Ahern). Yet, the emergence of the first Black Codes, limiting personal and political rights, in states like South Carolina and Mississippi, showed the necessity of intervention to prevent people of color from returning to subjugation. On the other hand, the Radical Republican Party’s tight grip on power in some of the Southern States left them vulnerable to attack as being too tough on whites. In Missouri, a border state that was home to numerous Ex-confederates, Radicals removed political and voting rights from all the Ex-Confederates in an attempt to protect their state’s constitution from racism…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Often people will argue that American politicians did little in the way of trying to avoid Civil war. After all, both Northern and Southern politicians were only trying to benefit their sides which ultimately led to each of the compromises failures. The Missouri compromise inevitably failed because of the main issue of the South’s demands to bring slavery into the western territories. The Compromise of 1850 failed because of opposition from anti-slavery Whigs and pro-slavery democrats, who couldn’t agree on a majority vote for any of Henry Clays compromises. The Kansas-Nebraska Act ended in failure because it failed it end the national conflict over slavery.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With drama now rumbling in the American underbellies, the small weight of anything slightly bad could set off a secession bomb. A freesoiler does not want to spread slavery, but he is okay with keeping it in a state it is already in. When the idea of popular sovereignty came about with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A), those freesoilers in office were pushed harder…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper sets out to define or shed some light on the possible reasons of the separation of Confederate states from the Union. The North believed the highest power belonged to the federal government while the South believed that each state governed itself, and the question of slavery should be decided by the states not by the federal government. By examining these two points we may be able to get a clear understanding of popular opinions and mindsets that would cause a nation to war against itself. With the election of Abraham Lincoln on November 6, 1860 South Carolina saw the only recourse was to secede from the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abolition societies in the North, they claimed, “[stirred] up insurrections among [their] slaves,” yet the government did not intervene (N). Why was Congress so inert concerning the protection of their rights? Disconcerted southerners wondered if it was not so much a matter of a passive government as that of an antislavery government. In the Constitution, “The only power conferred [to Congress] is the power coupled with the duty of guarding and protecting the [slave-]owner in his rights” (J). Southerners claimed that American government had grown to a stature in which it could do anything it wanted without protecting the slave-owner in his rights.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The increase in sectionalism and the tensions that arose from it was surprising to me because I naively assumed the United States was for the most completely united at this point in Antebellum America. The political polarization and its dramatic impact on the political landscape of the 1850s was very interesting to learn about. The creation of two political parties, Democrats and Whigs, really cemented the notion of the divide between North and South. The rise of such parties as the Free-Soil Party and the Know-Nothings, or the American Party, is very reminiscent of today’s political climate. While the undertones of the slavery debate create divides even within political parties, the concerns of the nativist movement shifting towards the immigration…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1850 Dbq Analysis

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The 1850’s were one of a chaotic time in American history. The North and the South were fighting over the slavery issues such as its legality, and the south’s economic dependency on it. The North viewed slavery as immoral and unconstitutional, but the South wanted slavery to stay because it was the South’s right to do so. Africans were long viewed by other people as the lowest beings, as property; therefore, in their favor the constitution justified slavery, William Lloyd Garrison even went as far as burning the constitution because it was a ‘pro’-slavery document. The North and the South were divided but they could not let go of each other’s throats. They attempted to compromise to prevent larger conflicts, but unfortunately, there were various…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While many Slave-holders in the nineteenth century saw it as a divine institution, they were in clear violation of God's moral law. As judgment for this national sin, the nation, and particularly the South, faced a devastating war over the issue of slavery. As has been seen in this essay, Southern slave-holders regarded the practice of slavery as a sacred institution drawing their arguments from human reasoning and the Bible. Man's reasoning will never lead a nation to righteousness, and the Bible gives no place for application of involuntary, permanent slavery outside of the Old Testament Theocratic kingdom. The misapplication of this in the southern slave-holding states brought God's judgment on the…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people in the South believed that “slavery was vital to the continuation of its livelihood and lifestyle” (Ret); therefore, many of the southerners supported slavery. They feared if slavery was…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of The United States of America was intended to be a source of national unity; however it never fully clarified the issue of slavery. By the 1850’s there were many different interpretations of the Constitution that led to much social discord within the country. Much of this social discord came from different opinions of whether the Constitution promoted unity or ultimately would lead to secession. Constitutional add-ons such as the 3/5 Compromise and popular sovereignty were used to promote unity, while events such as the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas- Nebraska Act and poor leadership from Presidents Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan led to secession in 1861.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Brown Abolitionism

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout the early history of the United States, the development of two clearly diverse cultures, the Northern culture and the Southern culture, had acted as an adverse foreshadowing of the internal conflict to come. The hostility between these two cultures peaked in the mid-1800’s over their different economic and social ways, but more specifically, over the issue of slavery. During this time, the South was defending their right to practice slavery, while the North’s desire to end this “inhumane” practice was becoming increasingly powerful. Yet, the North’s crusade to end slavery had no banner, no rallying point, or no kindling with which to fuel this burning desire. The North needed someone to rally behind, and John Brown became…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defending Slavery

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this section of the book, Finkelman gathered four documents written by three representatives of the Baptist and Protestant religion and by an anonymous person and edited by De Bow’s Review, a well circulated magazine in the South part of America within 19th century.…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays