Preview

How Do Supreme Court Cases Affect Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Do Supreme Court Cases Affect Society
Throughout the years, Supreme Court Cases have had a huge effect on our society and the growth of the United States. The Supreme Court is the highest judicial body in the United States, and is the only court established by the Constitution. All of the other courts in the United States must follow the decisions made by the justices of the Supreme Court. The Constitution also gives it the power to judge if a president’s action is unconstitutional. The Court meets in Washington D.C in the United States Supreme Court building. Nine justices compromise the U.S. Supreme Court, one chief justice and eight associate justices. Once approved, all justices serve for life. The President nominates candidates for the Supreme Court, and they must be approved …show more content…
When President Jefferson takes office, he orders his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver the commissions that should have been delivered. William Marbury, along with the other appointees who did not receive their commission, petitioned for a “writ of mandamus.” A “writ of mandamus,” by definition, orders a governmental body to perform an act required by law when this governmental body refuses to do so. Marbury is essentially forcing Madison by law to give him a reason as to why he did not receive his commission. Although Marbury might have had the right to this “writ of mandamus,” Chief Justice John Marshall denied the petition for a writ because the Constitution did not give Supreme Court the authority to issue such. Although section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 may have granted the right to issue the writ, it was ruled that the Court could not grant the writ because it was unconstitutional as it only applied to cases of original jurisdiction. If the Court had stretched original jurisdiction to include a case like Marbury’s, Congress would have overstepped it’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the supreme court had announced for the first time the concept that a court has the right to declare an act of congress void if it is inconsistent with the constitution. In addition William Marbury was an intended recipient of an appointment as a justice of the peace in the area of Columbia. Then when James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, he refused to deliver Marbury’s commission. Marbury and 3 others joined and petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking place in 1803, Marbury v. Madison was the landmark case that set the standard of judicial review into effect. This means that any previous ruling on a case can be used as a precedent and can determine the verdict. The background of this case is all sorts of messy; when John Adams’ term was near its end, William Marbury and a few others were appointed as “justices of peace” for the District of Columbia, however their positions were never official. When Thomas Jefferson came into office, he told James Madison, the Secretary of State at the time, to deny Marshall and the others’ commissions, so Marbury and the others then sued Madison. John Marshall ruled in favor of Marbury however could not deliver his commission because the constitution conflicted with a legislative act known as the Judiciary Act of 1789. This case was significant because it served as the basis for Article III of the Constitution that sets the standards…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison brief

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The PETITIONER, William Marbury, was appointed by outgoing president of the United States John Adams as Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia. Thomas Jefferson, the newly elected president ordered not to deliver commissions to newly appointed judges, including the PETITIONER, making him unable to assume office. PETITIONER asked the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus (based on the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the Supreme Court jurisdiction over petitions for writs of mandamus) forcing the RESPONDENT, Secretary of State James Madison, to deliver his commission.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court is a part of the Judicial Branch in the federal government. There is always a debate about what it can and can not do. People ask the question all the time, ‘Can the Supreme Court rule laws unconstitutional?’. The Supreme Court can rule laws unconstitutional, it has the power to overturn unconstitutional laws, that power is part of the checks and balances system that is in place to keep the power equal between all three branches of the government.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Marbury (Plaintiff) was an intended recipient of an appointment as justice of the peace. Marbury applied directly to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of mandamus to compel Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison (Defendant), to deliver the commissions. The Judiciary Act of 1789 had granted the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus “…to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States.” Ironically, John Marshall later became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and author of the case’s opinion…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States court system is structured under Article III of the Constitution which mentions the supreme court. We have three levels of federal court. These include district courts, the supreme court and courts of appeals. The appeals courts and district courts were made by act of congress unlike the supreme court. Justices and judges for all three of these levels are maintained and appointed by the President of course and if not the president them the vice president.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Supreme Court is the highest federal court to decide the outcome of cases from lower courts. All decisions and outcomes of the case are final, but the case must go through proper channels before going to the Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court has the authority to overturn, question, and investigate cases that were decided in lower courts. Researchers stated that the President of the United States has the authority to nominate a potential candidate with the advice and agreement of the Senate. Once the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices are appointed, all members have a life contract; however, if they violate the Constitution then they are more likely to be removed after impeachment.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court has one of the most important role in the United States of America. Not only it is the highest court in the country, it also has the power to hear any appeals of any cases that the federal court already decided on. Article 3 of the Constitution provided all the official powers of the supreme court. There are always 9 justices on the Supreme Court, but currently 8 justices. The nomination for the justices are made by the President of the United States. My impression of the Supreme Court of the United State that it is a very needed part of our government.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the Supreme Court

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chief Justice Marshal was now the new Supreme Court Judge who saw the case of Marbury. He misquoted the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 and portrayed them to be in conflict with one another? He asked this question, “Can an Act repugnant to the Constitution become the law of the land?” By asking this question he created a conflicting problem between an Act and the Constitution, meaning, to resolve the matter would lie in the hands of the Court. Chief Justice Marshal held that the section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that gave the Supreme Court power for writs of mandamus, exceeded the power that was given under the Constitution, so therefore it was not valid and unconstitutional. All this was a way for Chief Justice Marshal to create Judicial Review, he stated the Court had the power to resolve the matter. Chief Justice Marshal was one…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an rare event of major significance in American politics. Each appointment is significant because of the large amount of judicial power the Supreme Court exercises. Appointments are scarce, and some presidents may not even have to deal with a vacancy on the Court. The Constitution allow helps protect the Court’s independence from the President and Congress. When there is a vacancy in the Supreme Court, there are decisions that have to be made to fill that seat.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The supreme Court is the top court in the United States. It has an important role. It makes sure that the government follows the laws of the Constitution. The desisions of this court is final. About 7,500 cases are sent to the Supreme Court each year. But the court only hears about 90 cases each year. The first Supreme Court meeting in New York City in 1790. The Supreme Court is now based in Washington, DC. The court is made up of nine juges who are called justices. The justices are chosen by the President. Then the Senate interviewed and votes on the Presidents nominees. This process is important because the justices keep their jobs for life. One justice served for 36 years. All justices' must be trained in law. Many were elected officials…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Review

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court’s powers include many different things. They are the highest court within the judicial branch of the United States government. They are oftentimes the deciding factor when it comes to cases that derive from lower courts. Supreme Court justices are guaranteed a life long term and are appointed by the President (U.S. History). However, the Supreme Court has much more power than just listening to cases day by day. They are highly experienced individuals within their realm of expertise and they oftentimes find themselves checking to see if the executive and legislative branches of the United States government are abiding by the Constitution.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philippine Presidents

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court, composed of a Chief Justice as its presiding officer and fourteen associate justices, all of whom are appointed by the President from nominations submitted by the Judicial and Bar Council.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall sees that Marbury took to SCOTUS first and he questioned whether they had jurisdiction on the issue or not. When Congress modified powers of supreme court, the Congress did not have jurisdiction to modify powers of the branches. Only way to modify powers is to amend the Constitution. “Sorry Mr. Marbury, we can’t do anything for you as we don’t have jurisdiction.” Case was dismissed and created precedent for judicial review.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical Development

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the English were colonizing North America, they brought with them their laws. Being from the British Common Law system, the settlers understood how that system worked, so they modeled their own government using Common Law. In the 18th century, when the Union was formed and the colonies became states, they kept their Common Law governments. However, the Articles of Confederation set forth to establish one supreme court, being the federal court. Article III of the U.S. Constitution states: 'The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.' As a result of the Constitution and the forming of the Federal Court, the powers were divided between the state and central government. There are fifty-one separate systems of courts, one for each state and another for the federal government. Hence the term “dual court system”. The federal court system includes: the U.S. Supreme Court; the U.S. courts of appeal; the U.S. district court; and courts of special jurisdiction. The U.S. Supreme Court, established in 1789, is the highest judicial body and final court of appeal in the United States. Its nine members include one chief justice and eight associate justices who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court is responsible for explaining the U.S. Constitution and making sure that federal and state laws comply with its articles and amendments. It is based in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. In addition to the nine members, there are also court officers to assist the court in its performance. The other members are; Counselor to the Chief Justice, the Clerk, the Librarian, the Marshal, the Reporter of Decisions, the Court Counsel, the Curator, the Director of Information. Within the American Criminal Justice System there are two types of courts; the state court which is a state judicial structure. The state court…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays