Preview

How Does Hobbes Maintain Equal Liberties?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Hobbes Maintain Equal Liberties?
Our liberty, or freedom, to act or speak or be as we would like to be, although ours, must also fall within the confounds of the society we live in. Before much of the world was fortunate enough to be born into some sort of social system, life was spent much more separate from others. Your natural rights to the most basic aspects of life such as food, water, shelter, and the ability to live itself were much less assured. As Hobbes believed, all men lived in a natural state of war where “every man has the right to everything”, even to take the property and life of another human (Hobbes ch. XIV). For this reason, Hobbes thought was that only the strongest leader, an absolute monarch, could hold man back from his base instincts, for fear of death from that monarch’s hand. While the monarch would protect his own people, he would also would reign supreme so whether individuals would possess rights was completely left to the discretion of the monarch. This is how people lived for centuries. The concept of justice was, …show more content…
Children do not hold the same equal liberties as grown members of the public (Locke, ch. VI). They do not have the ability to fully understand the very rights that they would be given or the laws of society that they are meant to follow, making them a liability toward all others living around them. For this reason, a parent or guardian is given charge and control over the life of a child until maturity is reached. He also believes that if one’s mental faculties intact enough to understand rule of law, a situation those with mental disorders can find themselves in, they too need a guardian to be responsible for their actions. They are equal in their negative formal liberties that protect them from harm however they do not hold the same positive liberties that give them the right to act in certain ways, for fear of harm that would come to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The text states, “be the proclaimed author of everything that their existing sovereign does and judges fit to be done….nothing the sovereign does can wrong any of his subjects, nor ought any of them to accuse him of injustice.” (Hobbes, 2004, p. 80) Hobbes believes that to avoid the state of nature, every man versus every man, an absolute sovereign must govern the people to ensure there are no disagreements. According to Hobbes the absolute sovereign is the starting point of all laws and is given this power by the citizens, the text states “the authority that has been given to ‘this man’ by every individual man in the commonwealth, he has conferred on him the use of so much power and strength that people’s fear of it enables him to harmonize and control the wills of them all.” The sovereign was chosen to represent the will of the people, and knows what is best for…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi-286 Mod 3 Wa 1

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes lived during revolutionary times, beginning with the overthrow and demise of the English King, Charles 1, in 1641 (Newton, 2004). Hobbes writings of 1651 are documented with an influence from these events, while being credited with transition from medieval to modern thinking in Britain. Although Hobbes post-revolutionary treatise ultimately depended on accepting an absolute monarch, which contradicts present day philosophy, still, Hobbes is credited with the notion of a person's natural rights. Hobbes theory depicts the right of self-preservation, by stating a person may do whatever needs to be done to save their life and to procure the means to live (Newton, 2004). Hobbes' rather straightforward approach suggests that every man is an enemy of every man (Newton, 2004) and the worst that can happen to anyone is a violent death at the hands of others. Citing natural rights, Hobbes therefore indicates we have the right to prevent a violent death from taking place through self preservation, by taking action against those who may or may not harm us. Hobbes theory of mankind illustrates a violent, short, and solitary life, which arises perhaps his most powerful work. Hobbes identifies just how little humankind rarely uses good judgment. These ideals of natural rights, human judgment, and society set in motion a foundation, which would be expanded upon by…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes added to the ideas of democracy by creating the idea that all men are born bad with an urge for war. He stated that in order to have a stable society, government would be required to strictly watch and govern each citizen. He writes that man should give down their power to a much bigger government in order to maintain a single power that can help control the masses. This bigger…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next big difference in their beliefs is what constitutes a permissible governing body, it’s extent of power, and how that power is divided (if it even is). Again, their convictions are at two opposite extremes from each other.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The former is inherently aggressive, constantly attempting to escape its constitutional bounds. Society should guard their liberty jealously.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In times where Americans needed liberty the most, that is where they found it the least. As Justice David Davis once said, “By the protection of the law human rights are secured; withdraw that protection, and they are at the mercy of wicked rulers, or the clamor of an excited people,” (Source D). During the Civil War, there lied the question of wrong or right in the actions of our authority figures we entrusted our life, liberty, and happiness into the most. This remained so, with President Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of the Habeas Corpus, a writ that maintained the liberties of the accused, but was ultimately suspended by the uncontrollable peril the United State’s authorities felt they were receiving from the surrounding states.The suspension…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes and Locke did not have many of the same views on government. Though it is not directly stated in his text, most historians believe Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy. He believed the government should have absolute authority over all the citizens. He believed if such a government did not exist, we would live in a world of turmoil. The sovereign (government) has the obligation of keeping the peace and, when need be, national defense. The sovereign establishes all the laws, and has complete legislative,…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Hobbes’ mind humans are naturally violent and need to control to avoid any outbursts which would destroy social order (63). People with this thought process saw that the body in power should have complete authority over their subjects with no restraint on their power and no one being able to remove them from their throne. This however is setting a kingdom up for failure as even though some people can be prone to violence, oppressing them with a monarch that controls them too harshly or that are disinterested in ruing a kingdom can cause an even more violent uprising which is displayed in the French revolution. Nonetheless, having a government body put in power is necessary as humans do require leadership and social order but that same government body must be held accountable if there are caught doing any wrongdoings that could severely hinder the progress of the community or create arduous situations to their…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contributions of Hobbes include the recognition of the existence of the individual and individual rights along with the concepts of rationality, self-interest, competitiveness, and calculation as individual attributes. Adams and Sydie also point out (p. 14) that Hobbes did not consider the ruler or monarch to be ordained by God (as monarchs often claimed in the divine right of kings) or some external force, but by the people themselves since "authority is given by the subjects themselves." This is important in the development of ideas of political democracy in western Europe and North America.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes believed mankind good and evil depended on what the individual loved and hated. He believed that life in the state of nature is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." (119) Mankind was naturally equal in power of mind and body so no individual was capable of dominating another. In a strictly natural condition there was no justice or injustice because everyone had their right to seek and take whatever is good and dispose of whatever was bad for them. He was for absolute monarchy. Thomas Hobbes believed that “authoritarian governments were necessary to keep human beings’ worst impulses under control.”(119) He did not believe that a large group of men would agree with one and other and peacefully run a country. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic view of human nature. The passages in Hobbes writings show that he did not desire the possibility of anything like modern totalitarianism. For Hobbes, any division of power was an invitation to chaos.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the August before my sophomore year of high school, a challenge emerged. My dad had passed away. Of course you would read that and automatically think about how that would affect me in many ways. However no one, not even myself, was aware of the many challenges that went with this.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    not necessary for a covenant that would restrict the opinions of people, since people only reason in terms of morals, and moral tend to be the values of the individuals of society. Hobbes believes that the only way to ensure order in society is for the covenant to be established, and only through the covenant can there be order. The covenant for Hobbes is justice and order, since it was a transfer of rights that ended the constant war between individuals, by having them transfer some of their rights in return for security of one’s life. The transfer of rights included things like having a power dictate the laws, and the individual has no say in this, and cannot question it in any fashion.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hobbes and kant

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes was a different kind of philosopher that had a very pessimistic view on humanity. In Hobbes’ book the Leviathan, he believed that humans were naturally nasty creatures and needed to be regulated in a society. For Hobbes one thing he also believed in was Utilitarianism, which is the desire for pleasure that drives our actions, basically, the most useful choice for your benefit. Hobbes had a theory that was called “the state of nature”, which in the eyes of Hobbes was life for humans before any kind of laws or governments. He says that the state of nature is a violent place with no lows. In the state of nature there is no business, no account of time, buildings, and there is always danger around the corner. For Hobbes the “state of nature” was a savage place that could only be fixed by laws, there is only peace when there is no war and no war is a place with laws. Hobbes came to the conclusion that humans cant live in groups without law. Hobbes was…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains actions against public officers, the law and even fellow subjects as ways man utilizes. Further, Hobbes tells that this man’s nature; a desire to resist oppressive laws till they are changed or replaced. The human notions of right and wrong, injustice and justice promote common law, power and political order. According to Hobbes, oppression and injustice are regarded as qualities of the society - that their development is not within the human body, but within the community. Thomas Hobbes explains that these qualities are built on the collective desire of man to use power left to him, according to his judgment, to create political order and prevent tyranny.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays