The Constitution's Role In Preventing Tyranny

According to John Locke, the constitution plays the most significant role in preventing tyranny. However, at times people may lose faith in its authority as well as that of public institutions. The American constitution was created to avoid devolution, and this explains why it has many checks and balances preventing general rule by the executive order. Upholding the Constitution, therefore, creates political order and prevents devolution into tyranny.

Plato explained that democracy is more likely to devolve into tyranny, compared to a Monarchy or Aristocracy. Notably, this is because democracies are susceptible to control by the demagogues: people who entertain crowds to gain power. Demagogues create the mass action, which threatens even
He explains actions against public officers, the law and even fellow subjects as ways man utilizes. Further, Hobbes tells that this man’s nature; a desire to resist oppressive laws till they are changed or replaced. The human notions of right and wrong, injustice and justice promote common law, power and political order. According to Hobbes, oppression and injustice are regarded as qualities of the society - that their development is not within the human body, but within the community. Thomas Hobbes explains that these qualities are built on the collective desire of man to use power left to him, according to his judgment, to create political order and prevent tyranny. It is a possible explanation why individuals resort to civil war.

Anarchy refers to a political theory in which a society lacks a governing authority and control is achieved by voluntary cooperation. Anarchists are wrong to say that all states are inconsistent with ideals of freedom and autonomy. Notably, states undertake various actions domestically and internationally to promote human rights. For example, they enact legislation and report violations to international forums. In this way, they ensure the protection of human
First, they demonstrate that no particular individual or group should control all resources, but the society. Through voluntary cooperation, the community decides utilization and distribution of resources. Since different persons manage the funds, equal distribution occurs. Secondly, anarchists explain that most people disagree with the principles used in the allocation of resources by states. To them, delivery of justice through the distribution of funds remains unattained. For instance, when a person commits theft, countries ignore the distribution of justice within the society. Instead, the person is sentenced depending on whether he deserved the punishment. John Locke supports the entitlement theory in which a person who acquires property justly or through transfer is entitled to that holding .It also provides a legitimate method of transferring possessions from one person to another. Further, his theory of acquisition explains that all property is un-owned, and indicates boundaries of what labor-mixing comprises. The theory explains that social cooperation is crucial in defining property acquisition. The argument supports anarchism.

States play a pivotal role, not only in promoting freedom and autonomy but also in enhancing economic development, education and protection from external attack. State armies or police maintain law and order while ensuring that individuals respect