Preview

How Far Did Russia's Failure To Win The War Of 1905

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1028 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Did Russia's Failure To Win The War Of 1905
How far would you agree that the events of 1905 were caused by Russia’s failure to win the war against Japan? (30 marks)
Long-term factors:
Middle class- There was a lack of common purpose between Russia’s different social classes. They organised themselves by autumn of 1905 into soviets but spent most of the year protesting in spontaneous strikes/ marches. The peasants were too widely distributed and isolated to have a common organised leadership. Their protests were traditional peasant ones of burning manor records and rioting against redemption dues. In other words they were limited to self-interested economic motives rather than any hopes for revolutionary change in the system of government. The middle class were feeling they were unrepresented as little change occurred, and very little change affected them.
Urban working classes- Another long-term cause of the 1905
…show more content…
The result, Trotsky told the tsar was ‘the general dissatisfaction of all classes with the government and tgeur open hostility towards it’. Trotsky’s depressing conclusion was that ‘it is impossible to maintain this form of government except by violence’.
The Russo-Japanese War 1904/5- Russia lost the war not because the troops fought badly but because her military commanders had not prepared effectively. They didn’t understand the enemy or the territory they were fighting in. It was impossible to transport adequate reinforcements and supplies. The trans-Siberian railway was still incomplete was of little value. Russia was humiliated. The incompetence of the government was revealed, and excited on social unrest that it had been designed to dampen. The built up tension led to an open challenge to Tsardom- the 1905

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    18. Japan had many economic developments that gave Japan benefits in the wars it fought. It had new technology, weapons, etc. Many classes were abolished and new ones were formed.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq 3

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Russo-Japanese War: Imperialist rivalry between Russia and Japan led to war, Roosevelt had arranged for a diplomatic conference b/w the nations – agree to Treaty of Portsmouth (even though Japan was blamed for the US for not giving the country all they wanted from Russia)…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 19th century Russian rulers did anything in their power to keep the "French plague" from infiltrating Russia. The "French Plague" was a gradual move towards freedom and a more influential say in government. Russia avoided the "French Plague" by a period of isolation and oppression of their people. Japan also had a long period of isolation. The Japanese believed in the Mandate of Heaven or that there culture was the best. Because of their ethnocentric culture, only one Japanese port, Nagasaki, was open to traders once a year. During the late 19th century, both Russia and Japan were forced to make reforms and modernize by industrialization. They both had to do so rapidly because of Western interference and the West's increasing power in trade. During the early 20th century, Russia and Japan had managed to reform, industrialize, and make sufficient changes to build powerful nations, although they still couldn't compete with the West's supreme military and technological strength. The industrialization process for both Russia and Japan began during the same time period because of this they both shared many similar industrial responses, but also contrasted in many ways. Both Russia and Japan had some common characteristics, which explained how they kept independent from Western interference for such a long period of time. The two nations both new that learning from outsiders could profit them and not necessarily destroy their culture. Industrialization was easy for them because they followed a system of borrow and improve from other countries. Through Japan's Tokugawa shogunate and Russia's tsarist empire, both nations improved their political success. Instead, they used the state to pay for changes that in the West was backed by private businesses. In both Russia and Japan their rulers received more power. By emancipating the Russian serfs and the peasant class, both nations had a large labor force. Besides similarities there were also many differences in…

    • 1532 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This War with Japan was largely of Russia’s own making and it was here in 1904 where Nicolas II faced his first major test in foreign affairs to see if he was really strong enough to be Tsar. Russia’s main aims in the War were to pursue an expansionist policy in the Far East and also the Tsar wanted to distract from their domestic troubles by rallying into a patriotic struggle. However the War proved to be disastrous for Russia’s military as they had seriously underestimated the strength of the Japanese. This conflict led to disaster as Russia was defeated. It also showed up the problems with Russia’s government and the Tsar, as the military commanders had not prepared effectively enough. It was…

    • 578 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the opposition groups of the Tsar were known as the Populists, the Liberals and the Marxists. Each group had its own ideas on what was needed for Russia and each group wanted change, however, there were many problems within the groups and none of them were willing to work with each other. The Populists who were mainly concentrated on establishing a democratic government used violent tactics such as terrorism and assassinations, the most famous being the assassination of Tsar Alexander II. However, the Liberals, who also wanted to establish some sort of democracy did not agree on using violent tactics, they preferred to discuss things in meetings and banqueting campaigns. The Liberals were the most moderate of the opposition groups and wanted to keep the Tsar, but remove autocracy and have his current power shared between a democratic government. The Marxists, like the other two groups, also wanted to establish some sort of democracy; however, once again, they did not agree on using violence, they preferred to use propaganda campaigns, as did the Populists and Liberals, but not violence. These divisions meant that each opposition group’s strength alone was not enough to achieve their own specific goals and even though the groups did have some tactics such as propaganda in common, it was not enough. If each group had considered changing their tactics or been slightly more lenient, they may have succeeded.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russo-Japanese War began as a dispute between Russia and Japan, over Manchuria. In 1904, the Japanese attacked the Russian fleet at Port Arthur before formal declaration of war had even been received in Moscow. This surprised the Russian navy, gaining Japan an early victory.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With particular reference to the quotation below and the views of at least TWO historians, evaluate Trotsky’s role in the Soviet Union in the period 1896-1940.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas Romanov

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russ-Japanese was the beginning of the on going failure of Czar Nicholas II. The war began over both Japan and Russia wanting control over Manchuria, Russia was defeated and shaken. The Czars people began lose their faith as it started the many strikes and demonstrations in St. Petersburg. Starting a war was Nicholas’s plan to divert the attention from the national problems of Russia, however created the original division between the Czar and his people. The war was fought in the far eastern reaches of Russia and most of the population lived in Moscow and St. Petersburg, so talk of the war created little enthusiasm for people to fell about the war, which Nicholas was hoping for.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    conflict in the pacific

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Japan was now controlled by strong militarist, imperialist and nationalist influences that favoured Japanese expansion. Nationalist feeling and response excelled throughout Japan with Japanese victory in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-05. This was largely due to the symbolic nature of Japan’s victory, as it represented the first defeat of a European nation by an Asian nation in modern time.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays