Preview

How Successful Was The Franco-Prussian War Of 1870

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Successful Was The Franco-Prussian War Of 1870
The Franco-Prussian War of 1870
The Franco-Prussian War is easily described by realists as the French reaction to an increasingly unfavorable balance of power in Europe due to the unification of Germany. The French mobilized when Prussia attempted to place the German Prince Leopold upon the Spanish throne, although, “curiously, this issue had been more or less resolved in France’s favor before it declared war. France rode into battle despite having already scored a diplomatic victory in forcing the withdrawal of what it viewed as an objectionable candidate for the Spanish crown.” While the succession crisis was perhaps an official justification for the war, Napoleon III on a personal level was more immediately concerned with the pressing need
…show more content…
He believed that the war would be protracted, and took for granted that “he would have plenty of time to extort concessions from both of the German powers in return for French neutrality in the war.” Like much of Europe, Napoleon III was assured of an Austrian victory, and was thus thrilled by the early Austrian concession of Venetia. He hoped this success would bring him the support of France’s large Catholic population, which was being antagonized by the Italian threat of taking Rome. With Venetia under his belt, and with Otto Von Bismark’s promises to cede Luxembourg, Belgium, and Alsace-Lorraine, Napoleon III was prepared to win over his opposition and had, “decided early on to use the Austro-Prussian war to fortify his commanding position in Europe.” He was shocked to hear that the war was won in a mere seven weeks by Prussia, and that Bismark conveniently reneged on his previous promises. This was the beginning of the devolution of his empire, as liberal opponents set in motion new legislation to curb the omnipotence of the Emperor. As his ability to govern disintegrated, “one of the conditions the liberals laid down in taking office was that the Prussian gains of 1866 be regarded as legitimate and not a cause for revenge despite the French failure to obtain the promised compensation.” Napoleon III saw this as a major blow to his credibility …show more content…
In that time, he had disposed with the liberal promises of plebiscites and social and economic reform, and “had grown old, and France’s youth, none of whom could remember the anarchy and excesses of 1848, began to question his mildly repressive regime.” Frequent scandals of Bonaparte princes and official dignitaries blemished his rule. Indeed, the year 1870 began with Pierre Bonaparte, a cousin of Napoleon III, shooting Victor Noir, a republican journalist and killing him after he had published a critical article against Napoleon I. Huge crowds attended the journalist’s funeral and riots broke out in Paris in protest of the illiberal regime. Napoleon III grew increasingly nervous about his empire’s prospects, and the “relevance of all this to war and foreign affairs was plain. With his domestic support ebbing away, Napoleon III relied increasingly on foreign adventures to popularize his regime.” At this point, war was no longer a question but an absolute certainty, if Napoleon III wanted to keep his empire

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    1. Battle disasters quickly inflamed revolutionaries who thought the king was in league with the enemies. On August 10, 1792, a crowd of Parisians stormed the royal palace of the Tuileries and slaughtered the king’s guards. The royal family fled to the Legislative Assembly, escaping before the mob arrived. A month later, citizens attacked prisons that held nobles and priests accused of political offenses. About 1,200 prisoners were killed; among them were many ordinary criminals. Historians disagree about the people who carried out the “September massacres.” Some call them bloodthirsty mobs. Others describe them as patriots defending France from its enemies. In fact, most were ordinary citizens fired to fury by real and imagined grievances.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Important as reduced the number of states significantly to a mere 39 making unifcation much easier and more likely in the future.Also sparked the Germans resenting french dominance,little did Napoleon know that thsi anti french feeling would be…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Response Final

    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The are two sides to every story. The French Revolution brought significant change to France during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. It was a period of time that produced a remodeling of the French Government system, an Enlightened mindset, and the rise of a new prominent ruler, Napoleon Bonaparte. Emperor Napoleon, as he so deemed himself, initially took on his duties by trying to bring together what had been a much divided nation. He made concessions with both the left (the constitutionalists) and the right (the monarchists). His concessions earned him respect from many, however, as his power grew and grew, Napoleon developed a tendency to rely strongly on his military to gain power. His militaristic eagerness to monopolize Europe earned him much respect and praise from the French people, but very infrequently do we recognize those individuals that served in the military to carry through Napoleon’s aggressive orders. Those who fought for Napoleon’s success received very little in return; much to lack of motivation. Fortunately for the world, Jakob Walter’s story as a conscript for Napoleon’s Grand Army has been public for the world. His powerful accounts of the pitiful conditions that conscripts endured during their wartime travels would give many a different opinion of the “Great” Napoleon. As mentioned earlier, there are two sides to every story.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To most of Europe, Napoleon was just another conqueror trying to expand his territories, but to the people of France, he was a great leader; he “restored peace and order at home” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586). Restoring order to France was one of his greatest domestic achievements; the people loved him for his support in helping them win their fight for equal rights “to achieve wealth, status, and security for their property” (Kagan, Ozment, Turner, Frank 586).…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Franco- Prussian war was fought between the Second French Empire and a number of German states. These included the North German Confederation (made up of Prussia and many other northern German states). Bavaria, Baden, Wurttemburg, Hesse-Darnstadt. The war began due to a number of reasons: ranging from the fact that France worried that Prussia would expand too far and simply because Prussia wished to bring an end to France. Another crucial reason was the fact that Prussia had already annexed many northern German states and Prussia had a chance of inheriting Spain. This would not be good for France as they would be circled by enemies. However, what is believed to be the trigger cause in all this, was the fact that Prussia had altered a letter from France going to Wilhem I, stating that the French envoy was being treated badly.…

    • 526 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon's once unequaled army was now diminishing. After defeats in Spain and misfortune in Russia, countries began to realize that Napoleon's "invincible" reputation was tainted. For the first time people saw that this "unstoppable" general could, in fact, be stopped. Momentum and hope were gained by all of Napoleon's enemies. In 1813, Napoleon was in his German campaign. However, because of the Peninsular war, he was unable to send troops causing them to be 200,000 troops short. This created even more casualties and death for Napoleon, as he could just stand and watch his empire fall. Even more enemies were gathering against Napoleon, sensing his newfound weakness. Austria, Britain, Russia, Prussia and Sweden all joined forces to fight against Napoleon. Napoleon's forces were now by far outnumbered by this new alliance and he was barely holding on. Eventually, the allies would attack Paris and take the city. When Napoleon returned and heard of the defeat he knew it was the end. Finally realizing that his unstoppable armies had been stopped for good he abdicated on April 11th, 1814. The Peninsular War has helped diminish Napoleon's armies and expose his weaknesses. His enemies had finally caught on and in the end it was the great Napoleon who finally gave…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon also forced several nations to end its war against France such as Austria and Prussia. It was a big circle of transformation for France…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The great Bicentenary of the French Revolution of 1789 may be drawing to a close, but that of Napoleon is about to commence. So now is an opportune moment to present a critical overview of his…

    • 3793 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This newly established power served as the mechanism for the Diplomatic Revolution as it initiated a possible an Austro-French agreement. The ample affect of Prussian rise can be evaluated by considering the changes in Austrian objectives and realizations during Aix-la-Chapelle – the peace following the War of Austrian Succession. First, Aix-la Chappelle left Kaunitz, the Austrian chancellor, convinced that Britain would not help recover Silesia. Second, Kaunitz had discussed a potential agreement with France, in which France would help recover the lost territory in return for a large part of the Netherlands that would be given to Louis XV’s son-in-law, Don Philip in return for three Italian Duchies that were assigned to him under the peace of Aix-la-Chapelle (Horn 444). At this point, it was also acknowledged that Austria’s main threat was no longer France, but Prussia (448). In addition, Prussia’s gains following the war left Austria with two main objectives - internal reform focused on centralizing and strengthening the sate, and the recovery of Silesia along with the regaining of a dominant position in Germany (Scott and McKay 175). Austria’s changing ideology of raison d’état demonstrated the extent to which Prussia’s new role in the European balance of power influenced policy and decision making. The victor circuitously coerced Austria into talks with France, ones she would have otherwise not…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Napoleonic wars, Napoleon’s primary goal was to invade England however France navy was crushed by British fleet in the Battle of Trafalgar. Napoleon tries to harm England by limiting of “Continental System” which is to crash the countries who are economy partnership with England (Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Spain). Nevertheless, Austria was in a threatening area geographically between France and Russia. Metternich used his negotiation skill to kept Austria neutral during the war between Russia and France in 1812.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    France in the 19th century was a country that was in trouble. In the beginning of the century its people were picking up the pieces from overthrowing a powerful and well established monarch. The people had to weather a failed first republic and the Napoleonic Wars. French people then had to deal with a restoration of the monarchy and a return of the power to the Bourgeoisie. Living as a common person in France was no easy task. While slavery no longer existed legally, its basic principles were still practiced over the peasants by the powerful Bourgeoisie. In the novel The Life of a Simple Man the protagonist is a peasant man named Tiennon. The story is a fictional account of life of a peasant in 19th century France. Tiennon lives through most of these historical events but most of them had no real effect on his day to day life. The one event that truly affected all peasants was the second empire of Napoleon III and his war against Prussia in 1870.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon was a great soldier that graduated from military school at the age of sixteen and quickly worked his way through the ranks. Napoleon was a brilliant leader in battle and consistently defeated armies larger than his own; including when he forced the Austrians to make peace after defeating four of their generals. In 1799 Napoleon and his colleagues overtook the French government and established power. He revised the constitution in 1802 to make himself consul for life, and then again in 1804 to make himself Emperor of France. Soon after Napoleon came to power he restructured the administration, simplified the court system, and began monitoring the schooling system; French law was also put in the Napoleon Code which guaranteed the rights and liberties that were gained through the revolution. Napoleons violent behavior caused war with Britain to break out, who allied with Russia and Austria. Prussia later allied themselves with Russia; creating a huge alliances against France and Napoleon. Napoleon successfully extended his reign over large parts of Europe and put each state under the Napoleon Code, which gave citizens new rights and privileges. In 1812 all of Europe turned against Napoleon, which lead to his exile in 1814. He regained power in 1815 just to loose it later that year. He died in exile in Saint Helena in 1821.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was born on 15th of August 1769 in Corsica. Educated at military school, he served in Valence and Auxonne until after the outbreak of the Revolution in 1789. He was promoted to the rank of brigadier general at age of 24 because of his strategy in the siege of Toulon and subsequently appointed as the commander of French Army in Italy. France now faced a new coalition - Austria and Russia had allied with Britain.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The French people in the eighteen hundreds were tired of wars, battles, bloodshed, and unorganized governments. They wanted someone who would take over completely and keep them safe. Napoleon promised to do so, keeping the people satisfied. In doing this, they had to sacrifice many freedoms. One example of these would be freedom of speech. Napoleon wouldn’t allow the press to say anything bad about him or express an opinion that he did not approve of (Smitha). This was the same way for his enemies. He did not want the people of France to hear anything negative about him, which also meant nothing negative would be allowed to be said. Napoleon also drafted many soldiers before they turned eighteen. So young guys, at the age of seventeen, sixteen, or even fifteen, were drafted to go out and fight for their country (Vigil). They had no say in the matter. If they were chosen, they had to go. This kept France safe, but mothers and families worried. All of these freedoms were given up for their own security and safety.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays