The elites of Brazil believed that their society was a “racial democracy”, mostly in part due to being compared to the United Stated. In comparison to the United States, which had lynch mobs and legal segregation of minorities, Brazil with its acceptance of African cultures seemed progressive. Whereas the United States legally incorporated racism into their society, Brazil’s form of racism appeared as subtly woven into the social relations and mechanisms of the country. Instead of minorities being dictated by law to be at a social and economic disadvantage, the social, cultural, and political environment of Brazil forced minorities to regulate themselves to reside in the “appropriate place” socially, geographically, and economically. This informal segregation continued to be perpetuated due to the “etiquette” of Brazil’s racial relations – one did not discuss the racial situation with others, especially not in a controversial
The elites of Brazil believed that their society was a “racial democracy”, mostly in part due to being compared to the United Stated. In comparison to the United States, which had lynch mobs and legal segregation of minorities, Brazil with its acceptance of African cultures seemed progressive. Whereas the United States legally incorporated racism into their society, Brazil’s form of racism appeared as subtly woven into the social relations and mechanisms of the country. Instead of minorities being dictated by law to be at a social and economic disadvantage, the social, cultural, and political environment of Brazil forced minorities to regulate themselves to reside in the “appropriate place” socially, geographically, and economically. This informal segregation continued to be perpetuated due to the “etiquette” of Brazil’s racial relations – one did not discuss the racial situation with others, especially not in a controversial