Preview

Human Relations Management

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Relations Management
(1)In his 1960 book, The Human Side of Enterprise, Douglas McGregor proposed two theories by which to view employee motivation. He avoided descriptive labels and simply called the theories Theory X and Theory Y.
(1)Theory X assumes that the average person: dislikes work and attempts to avoid it, has no ambition, wants no responsibility, and would rather follow than lead. Is self-centered and therefore does not care about organizational goals, resists change, is gullible and not particularly intelligent. (1)Theory Y makes the following general assumptions: work can be as natural as play and rest, people will be self-directed to meet their work objectives if they are committed to them, people will be committed to their objectives if rewards are in place that address higher needs such as self-fulfillment, under these conditions, people will seek responsibility and most people can handle responsibility because creativity and ingenuity are common in the population.
(2)Human relations are important to the development and long term sustainability of organizations, can be classified into two main points as follows:
• Industrial relations, or human relations which results from the meetings of management and workers.
• The personal or human relationships which spring up, grow and exist in any work place environment.
The possibility that the policy of improved human relations may be pursued solely because of its effect on productivity, and not from the more fundamental motive of producing a correct and balanced attitude to the personal and social needs of the workers.
(c)Tough is hard to do an absolutism as Theory X will do, such as not caring too much about employees needs because as Theory X points out that the average worker is assumed to work just for the money and security. Sometimes there is no time to satisfy employee’s needs because there are more important situations around, as consulting employees before making decisions I think the manager has to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    According to Kreitner and Kinicki (2013) McGregor contrasted two views on human nature by insisting that Theory Y assumes that people are more positive at work, and believed managers could accomplish more by viewing employees as such (p.9). The other outdated theory, is Theory X, which is a more negative and pessimistic assumption about workers.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    unit 650

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    whilst these assumptions about staff have aspects that are caricatured or stereotyped there has been a a degree of acceptance that in large, mass production organisations theory X is more relevant, partly because theory Y is difficult to apply. However theory Y is considered to be relevant to organisations where there is a commitment from staff to the organisations objectives. Where staff are able to apply direction and autonomy then they can work better than if they had been carrying out specific directed instuctions.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    MSA 601 PHILOSOPHY SIGLAR

    • 1042 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The human relation’s movement proved to the world that humans are not “things” doing the work, but that they are human with emotions that need management’s attention. Organizations who took an interest in their employees’ working conditions and ideas only benefited in the business world. The increased attention given to the employees by their employer was a good way to reach out and let the worker know that they were valued and their welfare was a concern of the company (Charles, 2005). Employees want to feel as if they are contributing to the overall mission otherwise all of their work is for nothing. An organization who is willing to learn what their employees are feeling and take into consideration McGregor’s Theory Y Assumptions will complete their mission faster, better, and more profitable than any business who operates with the mindset that their employees are “just worker bees”.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. How to implement theories in order to improve the relationship between management and workers…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gvnvnc

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6.Employee performance that is not linked to a reward system which results in the employee losing motivation to do the job is called expectancy theory.True…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    McGregor grouped employees hierarchy need into lower-order needs (Theory X) and higher-order needs (Theory Y), and opined that “these two opposing perceptions conjectured how people view human behavior at work and organizational life” (Wambugu, 2014). For instance, Theory X assumed that management's role in the organization is to pressurize and control employees to perform based on the insinuation that human beings are pressure seekers who dislike work; do not want responsibility, and have little or no ambition etc. as such it's the duty of managers to make them do their job, and often with threats of punishment in order to get them to achieve the organizational objectives. On the other hand, Theory Y assumed that management's role in an organization involves developing the potential in employees and help them to achieve their maximum potential towards common organizational goals based on the views that people among other things learn to accept and seek responsibility, creativity, ingenuity which will have the potential to boost the organizational performance (Wambugu, 2014). These theories could be used by management either ways to encourage employees, but better results would be gained by the use of Theory Y, rather than Theory X (McGregor,…

    • 3719 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Describe 4 factors, 2 internal and 2 external, which impact on the employment relationship.…

    • 3573 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    There are so many fallacies for instance the term of ‘human relations’ and ‘human resources’ where the contemporary organisation unseen the differences between this two approaches. Both human relations and human resources manager might use the same kind of organisational behaviour but for very different reasons (Miller 2009). Human relations approach emphasize on productivity where the management advocates better on treatment of subordinates in belief that it will lead to greater productivity. According to Miller (2006), the human relation management pay little attention to the individual needs of employees, to nonfinancial rewards in the workplace, or to the prevalence of social interaction in organisations. On the other hand, human resource approach pays more attention on workers’ feeling where theorists recognise that individuals in organisation have feelings that must be considered and also acknowledge that individual labour is an important ingredient for meeting the organisational goal (Miller 2006). Some of the theoretical approaches that could be brought into discussion of the differences between human relations and human resources are from well-known scholars such as Elton Mayo, Abraham Maslow, Fredrick Herzberg, Rensis Likert as well as Robert Blake (Miller 2009).…

    • 4513 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Catt, Stephen E. and Donald S. Miller. Human Relations: A Contemporary Approach. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1989.…

    • 3279 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Neo Human Relations

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Human Relations Movement refers to those researchers of organizational development who study the behavior of people in groups, in particular workplace groups. It originated in the 1930s' Hawthorne studies, which examined the effects of social relations, motivation and employee satisfaction on factory productivity.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical Theory

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Classical management theory and human relations theory represent two views of management on the opposite ends of the spectrum. One view focuses on looking at workers solely as a means to get work done, while the other focuses on developing an organization and the behaviors and motivations of employees. Most managers find that a combination of the two theories serves them best in their businesses.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mc Gregors Theory X and Y

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The foundation of McGregor’s theory has direct links to Taylor’s study of scientific management: a study of scientific management as a link between human beings and their jobs which in turn need to be re-constructed to maximise efficiency (Waddell et al. 2007, p. 43). Many researchers and scholars have developed theories based on the work of F.W. Taylor. McGregor, Maslow and others who assisted to improve the view of human relation tried to prove that there is another side to the traditional perspective of workers (Bartol and Martin 1998, p. 52).This literature review will be focusing on the evolution of McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y in relation to the development of management theory. Moreover will be explaining the definition of X and Y theory and its relevance to 21st century.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The important strand in the development of modern management was the increase in attention to the human factors, which has become known as the 'human relations school of management.’ The core aspect of Human Relations Theory is that, when workers were being observed and included in the research, they felt more important and valued by the company. As a result, their productivity levels went up significantly. This represented a significant departure from many of the classical theories, particularly Fordism, as it went against the notion that management needed to control workers, and remove their autonomy at every step. Instead, it showed that by engaging with workers and considering their requirements and needs, company’s could benefit from increased productivity.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the interests of the two participants- labor and management, but also the economic and social…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critically evaluate McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. How far is it applicable to management and employee motivation in contemporary Chinese organizations?…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays