Preview

Classical Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Classical Theory
The Difference Between a Classical Management Theory & a Human Relations Theory by Stacy Zeiger, Demand Media
Human relations theory seeks to develop satisfied employees.

Human relations theory seeks to develop satisfied employees.
Related Articles

How Do I Write a Business Letter With Enclosure? The Average Profit Margin for a Restaurant What Are the Major Ethical Issues Business People Face? How to Resolve Host Issues in Google Chrome How to Attach Documents to Email on an iPad Examples of Conflicts & Resolutions in the Workplace

Classical management theory and human relations theory represent two views of management on the opposite ends of the spectrum. One view focuses on looking at workers solely as a means to get work done, while the other focuses on developing an organization and the behaviors and motivations of employees. Most managers find that a combination of the two theories serves them best in their businesses.
Ads by Google
Ssangyong Korando Special
New Offer On SsangYong Korando From Only R2499p/m. Enquire Online Now! www.ssangyongdeals.co.za What is Classical Management Theory?

Classical management theory involves creating multiple levels of workers to improve productivity. Employees at the lowest levels find their tasks overseen by supervisors who, in turn, are overseen by managers. At every level, employees are expected to perform tasks according to specific procedures designed to maximize productivity. In addition, this theory focuses on an impersonal side of business. Employees and managers should not allow friendliness and personal interactions to become involved with the organization. Rules must be followed exactly, and the hiring and firing of employees must relate only to the skills they possess.
Pros and Cons of Classical Management Theory

Classical management theory is not used in many organizations because of its shortcomings. While some components of the theory, such as designing
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Com 210 Project Report
    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Com 210 Project Report

    The classic management theory you have selected, with a brief explanation of the relevance of this author to your analysis. Note that later in the term you may encounter other theories that may be equally or more applicable to your analysis…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mgt 300 Study Guide - Exam 2
    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Mgt 300 Study Guide - Exam 2

    Chapter 2: The classical approaches (scientific management, administrative principles, and bureaucratic organization) share a common assumption: people at work act in a rational manner that is primarily driven by economic concerns. Scientific Management: in 1911, Fredrick W. Taylor published The Principles of Scientific Management, in which he made the following statement: “The principle object of management should be to secure maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for the employee. He noticed that many workers did their jobs their own ways and without clear and uniform specifications. He believed this caused them to lose efficiency and underperform. He believed the problem would be fixed by scientific management: emphasizes careful selection and training of workers and supervisory support. Principles of Scientific Management: 1. Develop for every job a “science” that includes rules of motion, standardized work implements, and proper working conditions. (Gilbreths motion study- the science of reducing a task to its basic physical motions)2. Carefully select workers with the right abilities for the job. 3. Carefully train workers to do the job and give them the proper incentives to cooperate with the job “science.” 4. Support workers by carefully planning their work and by smoothing the way as they go about their jobs. An example of its present day influence can be seen at United Parcel Service where many workers are guided by carefully calibrated productivity standards. The point is that savings of seconds on individual stops adds up to significant increases in productivity. Administrative Principles: in 1916, Henri Fayol published Administrative Industrielle et Generale, a book that identifies 5 “duties” of mgmt, which closely resemble the 4 functions of mgmt we talk about today: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Administrative Principles: 1.foresight- to compete a plan of action for the future 2.Organization- to…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Management Midterm Study Guide
    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Management Midterm Study Guide

    Classical Management Theory (Pg37) A theory that focused in finding the “one best way” to perform and manage tasks.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Organization and Management Anaylsis
    • 1547 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Organization and Management Anaylsis

    Organizational and management analysis is an integral part of any organization that desires to be successful. In the world we live in today and its environment, teamwork, delegation, information technology has a lasting impact on any organizations core and character. This type of characteristic lends to an organization’s cost reduction, waste reduction, employees satisfaction as well as the overall efficiency of the company. To possess the ability to have an organizational and management analysis and review with departmental managers, senior executives are necessary. This lends to a multi-dimensional examination and gives a detailed insight of how the organizations actually functions and were it needs to be restructured if necessary, (Jones, 2006). Understanding and identifying the various styles of organizational theories can aid any organization in preparing for its future success. For managers, it is imperative that they have the capability to adapt their managerial styles in order to push through and keep the success of the organization intact. This paper is designed to give a description of the different styles of organizational theories; a comparison of management styles and theories and which style currently describes the writer’s present organization theory and management style.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ideas of the Classical Theorists Particularly Those of Bureaucracy and Scientific Management, Are Generally Considered as Rather Old Fashioned and Out of Date, and of Little Relevance to Organisations Today.
    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Ideas of the Classical Theorists Particularly Those of Bureaucracy and Scientific Management, Are Generally Considered as Rather Old Fashioned and Out of Date, and of Little Relevance to Organisations Today.

    Management has been studied by a lot of theorists who then learning from their own experiences came out with different theories and styles of management, explaining how to manage. The classical school has proven to be one of the most influential of all the schools. (Brooks 2009). Due to the success of the bureaucratic and scientific management style of managing, this essay will look into the bureaucratic style of management and then the scientific style of management and show that although these theories were developed during the turn of the twentieth century, they are still present in organisations today and are still very relevant to this day and age.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain how the managerial ideas of Taylor and Fayol differ from Mayo. Assess the relevance of Classical Management theorists to the management of contemporary organisations
    • 1304 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Explain how the managerial ideas of Taylor and Fayol differ from Mayo. Assess the relevance of Classical Management theorists to the management of contemporary organisations

    The "Human Relations" approach is associated with the work of E Mayo and F Roethlisberger. Immediately, we can see a difference between the ideas of Taylor and Fayol and those of Mayo as they are even classified differently. In order to explain how these managerial ideas differ, I will first explain what those ideas were.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Scientific Management Theorist Taylor and the Human Relations Management Theorist Mary
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and Contrast the Scientific Management Theorist Taylor and the Human Relations Management Theorist Mary

    Models have been developed by people to understand management and Quinn used the competing values framework to relate the main models (Quinn et al., 2003). The human relations model is about flexibility while the rational goal model is about control. There is a lot more differences than similarities. Taylor (Pugh and Hickson, 1989), the scientific management theorist emphasizes the maximization of workers’ prosperity while Follett, the human relations management theorist, focuses on development of human resources. Currently, the theories introduced by them are still widely used in many organisations.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Classical and Contemporary Theories
    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Classical and Contemporary Theories

    xiii. Had to make up classes because academic curriculum in Colorado and Virginia are different…

    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    My Philosophy of management
    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My Philosophy of management

    O 'Connor, E. (1999). "The politics of management thought: A case study of Harvard business school and the human relations school." Academy of Management Review 24(1): 117-131.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Human Relation vs Human Resources
    • 4513 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Human Relation vs Human Resources

    There are so many fallacies for instance the term of ‘human relations’ and ‘human resources’ where the contemporary organisation unseen the differences between this two approaches. Both human relations and human resources manager might use the same kind of organisational behaviour but for very different reasons (Miller 2009). Human relations approach emphasize on productivity where the management advocates better on treatment of subordinates in belief that it will lead to greater productivity. According to Miller (2006), the human relation management pay little attention to the individual needs of employees, to nonfinancial rewards in the workplace, or to the prevalence of social interaction in organisations. On the other hand, human resource approach pays more attention on workers’ feeling where theorists recognise that individuals in organisation have feelings that must be considered and also acknowledge that individual labour is an important ingredient for meeting the organisational goal (Miller 2006). Some of the theoretical approaches that could be brought into discussion of the differences between human relations and human resources are from well-known scholars such as Elton Mayo, Abraham Maslow, Fredrick Herzberg, Rensis Likert as well as Robert Blake (Miller 2009).…

    • 4513 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Classical Approach to Organizational Communication
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Classical Approach to Organizational Communication

    Classical approach is an approach to the organization that doesn’t account the individual needs of its employees, doesn’t give any financial reward, and no social interaction. It deals with very little communication and focuses more on how division of work and labor. Classical theory approach assumes that the organizational members are the tools of the management and as tools they are part of the organization’s system and is expected to perform accordingly to their function.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theory X, Theory Y
    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Theory X, Theory Y

    Theory X presumes that average employees dislike work, are lazy, dislike responsibility, and must be coerced to perform. (text book citation pg 177) Theory X is focused on an authoritarian management style. Rewards and punishments are assumed to be the key to employee productivity. Employees have little to offer in terms of organizational problem solving. Under Theory X employees need to be controlled and threatened to get them working. Employees work for money and security only. According to theory X, appraisals and promotions occur on a regular basis. This view is based on that employees merely satisfy their lower-level physical needs and could not hope to be as productive.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theory X And Theory Y
    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theory X And Theory Y

    In this theory, management assumes employees are inherently lazy and dislike work. As a result of this, management believes that workers need to be closely supervised and comprehensive systems of control developed. A hierarchical structure is needed with narrow span of control at each and every level. According to this theory, employees will show little ambition without an enticing incentive program and will avoid responsibility whenever they can. According to Dr Kumi Mark, if the organizational goals are to be met, Theory X managers must rely heavily on the threat of punishment to gain compliance of employees. When practiced, this theory can lead to mistrust, highly restrictive supervision and a punitive atmosphere. The Theory X manager tends to believe that everything must end in blaming someone. He or she thinks all prospective employees are only out for themselves. Usually these managers feel the sole purpose of the employee's interest in the job is money. They will blame the person first in most situations, without questioning whether it may be the system, policy, or lack of…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Define Motivation. Critically evaluate contribution of Mc Gregor to Motivation.
    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Define Motivation. Critically evaluate contribution of Mc Gregor to Motivation.

    In this theory management assumes employees are inherently lazy and will avoid work if they can. Because of this, workers need to be closely supervised and comprehensive systems of control put in place. A hierarchical structure is needed, with narrow span of control at each level, for effective management. According to this theory employees will show little ambition without an enticing incentive program and will avoid responsibility whenever they can.…

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theory X and Theory Y
    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theory X and Theory Y

    Theory X assumes that employees are naturally unmotivated and dislike working, and this encourages an authoritarian style of management. According to this view, management must actively intervene to get things done. This style of management assumes that workers:…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics