Preview

Hunters And Gatherers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hunters And Gatherers
Hunters and gatherers lived very different lives from Agriculturalists. I mean in some ways they were similar, but mostly they were complete opposites. Like how different their eating habits were. One had a large diverse diet where the other lived on the same thing day after day. Another would be with how population differs so much with the amount of children each way of life can support. The final one talked about is how how they place value on things differently or at all.
The health of hunters and gatherers is very good compared to agriculturalists. They eat a lot of a different things in very small amounts and most all of them are natural. They also use gender specialization when hunting and gathering. Women do the gathering and men do
…show more content…

If they were to have large families like agriculturalists it would require more food and the more children there are the more care and time they take away from the hunting and gathering. Agriculturalists on the other hand are the exact opposite. The more kids there are means more people to work in the fields and help take care of the crops.
Due to the fact that hunters and gatherers move around a lot they don't have anything of value to other hunter and gatherers. Which means there isn't any theft going on because they gather their food when they need it, they don't keep it supplied somewhere, no they just get it when it is needed. They also don't own land seeing as how they are constantly moving around. Agriculturalists on the other hand own land and livestock. They are competing for space to grow their crops, and raises the livestock. This causes problems to arise like the stealing of livestock or crops.
Many aspects of the life of hunters and gatherers differ so much from the life of agriculturalists. Things like health, population, or how they place value on things. There are so many other parts to cover though. Like technology, environmental impact, or social problems and many more. They were two very different societies living very different lives, which would you


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * Hunter- gatherers- hunt animals and also gather seeds, berries, nuts, and the roots and bulbs of plants…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hunter-gatherers- people roamed the lands, hunted wild animals and ate edible plants. The men usually hunted bigger animals and used spears, rocks and strategy. They slept in caves or dwellings made from branches and animal skin. Their clothing was from animal skin.…

    • 4428 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Provide specific information in your essay. Be sure to explain both how the civilizations were alike, and how they were different, in those categories. You can use the River Valley Civilizations sheet as a reference.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    APWH Unit 1

    • 2012 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Although farming is often harder than hunting and gathering, agriculturalists, because of their capacity to increase their population, expanded across much of the planet at the expense of hunter-gatherers. The process was gradual and largely peaceful. In some places pastoralism, the dependence on herd animals prevailed.…

    • 2012 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why hunter changed societies to sedentary agriculture is because this was a way for him to apply food much easier. When people began to figure out how to plant and harvest crops. Life became much easier. Much rather than searching for food every night. James Woodburn helped hunter when he found a rich enlightened area of Hadza. Full of life and places to harvest their food. The transition of agriculture also played a huge part in why hunter switched. The number of people living in each area implied that if there was a lot of people in a certain area, then there will be less crop being planted due to population density. They needed more food so feed the growing population.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neolithic Age: Population increases, harvesting wild grains, food surplus, job specialization, animal domestication, inventions, religion government, and gender differences.…

    • 3087 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To support the evolutionary perspective, the division of labour was shown to be an advantage. Men were the hunter gathers, breadwinners, while the mother was at home acting as the ‘angel of the house’ and looking after the children. If a women was to hunt, this would reduce the group’s reproductive success, as the woman was the one who was pregnant or producing milk. Although, the women could contribute to the important business of growing food, making clothing and shelter and so on. This enhances reproductive success but it also important in avoiding starvation – an…

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Compare and contrast the locations of first Agricultural societies, the plants and animals they domesticated and their impact on the environment (Mesopotamia, Nile River, Sub-Saharan Africa, Indus River, Huang He valley and Mesoamerica)…

    • 2663 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A hunter gatherer is a member of a traveling nomadic group with no purpose besides survival. The group also has to have little use for money or other items used as currency. The hunter-gatherers divide labor bases on gender and age. These groups rely on gathering whatever food that they could find that was edible to survive.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As hominids were transitioning from the Paleolithic era to the Neolithic era their culture, social classes, and gender roles had various differences and similarities. The culture in the Paleolithic era and the Neolithic era similarities was the shared beliefs in the afterlife, however the Paleolithic hominids practiced polydaemonism and in Neolithic era there was the beginnings of an organized religion, and the creation of gods. In the Paleolithic era it was an egalitarian society due to both of the men and women contributing to the production of food, and Neolithic hominids place in society was predetermined. Furthermore, there was a gender distinction in the Paleolithic and Neolithic era due to the rise of the Agricultural Revolution…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One social difference is what they believe in. The People of the Paleolithic ages people believed that nature controlled everything. While in the Neolithic age people believed that god created and controlled everything. A political difference was the way they communicated was also different. In the Paleolithic age people communicated using gestures and objects. In the Neolithic age people became more advanced and developed a writing system and…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The adoption of agriculuture offered much room for advancement. In hunter-gatherer societies, people had to move with their food sources often in order to survive. The adoption of agriculture offered a fixed place in which it was safe to remain without starvation being a concern. People could now keep more items with them, domesticate animals, and live around each…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Cree and Baka hunters

    • 1903 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The modern Japanese writing system transcribes the insult baka "fool; idiot" as バカ in katakana, ばか in hiragana, or 馬鹿 (lit. "horse deer") in ateji phonetic kanji transcription; earlier ateji renderings included 莫迦, 母嫁, 馬嫁, or 破家.[2]…

    • 1903 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rural life vs urban life

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most important difference can be found by comparing the sociological structure of farm life to the same structure in a city. Larger communities enable all members to have more privacy than in smaller communities, thus a certain sense of “anonymity” arises which in it’s turn allows for less morally accepted behavior, because the level of social control declines to a level where it’s virtually nonexistent. In contrast with the sense of anonymity in cities, there is the small scale rural life where pretty much everyone knows everyone and as such the actions within the community are more visible and controllable than in a city. This explains the difference in mindset of rural and urban people.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Look for information about each society in relation to the features of a Civilisation. For instance, did they live in cities? If not, what were their settlements like?…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays