That these creatures can be a sort of entertainment for the generations to come. It it very contradicting to his previous statements of wanting to de-extinct these animals just because it is the right thing to do. Doing so further lowers not only his credentials and how the readers feel about him, but on whether or not humans should be involved with anything genetic if it just leads to “pure thrill” and…
Moreover, such measurements suggest children that animals have less value than ourselves, even worse, that some animals are indeed more valuable than others. Furthermore, this demonstrates how nonsensical it is to introduce a species that we will ultimately…
Genetic engineering would be another ethical dilemma in bringing back the dinosaurs after they became extinct animals. There was a reason why natural selection took them off the face of the earth. The scientists took the DNA of dinosaurs from a mosquito that they found underground after it was fossilized in amber. With regard to what was said in the movie the scientists used frog DNA to fill the gaps between the dinosaurs DNA. It would have many scientists intrigued by this genetically engineered animal that was brought back to life but it would also have a lot of people scared if they somehow got their research stolen.…
The understanding of the legal restrictions and the genetic engineering were deepened during the presentation of Jurassic Park. This included the real laws preventing Jurassic park from existing. The class discussed whether or not genetically engineering extinct species should be legal. The class came to an agreement that the decision depends on the situation and how acceptable or unacceptable it was. Each situation is catered with its own specific needs as well as moral understandings. It is decided what is acceptable or unacceptable based on those specific needs and understandings making every situation different.…
Micheal Crichton’s 1990 novel “Jurassic Park,” is a science fiction cautionary tale of how reckless experimentation without proper oversight can lead to catastrophic results. The novel revolves around an isolated Costa Rican island and the dangerous experiments taking place there. When a series of mysterious animal attacks begin to occur on mainland Costa Rica, a connection is made between the attacks and the “biological reserve” on Isla Nublar. Two paleontologists Allen Grant and Ellie Sattler are among the group whisked away by billionaire John Hammond to the island for a weekend. The island is revealed to be Jurassic Park, a themed park showcasing the world’s first cloned dinosaurs. The scientists at John Hammond’s research company, InGen, used dinosaur DNA found in the blood of parasites preserved in amber to reconstruct dinosaurs. All the dinosaurs in the…
All things nature, trees, animals, and even human beings, are all part of this natural web. Once they saw the bird feeding out of another person's hand, they didn't say anything. Nevertheless, being human means that we have emotional connections which can be formed between nature and humans. Alongside this, when Mary Oliver says, ““Still, being human and partial therefore to my own successes-” (Oliver 19-20), the acceptance of being human alongside the acceptance of the fact that we cannot control nature's…
In the essay titled “Religion and Animal Rights” by American Philosopher Tom Regan, Mr. Regan maintains the position that animals are the “subjects-of-a-life”, just as humans are. If we want to ascribe value to all human beings regardless of the degree of rationality they are capable of, then in order to be consistent we must similarly ascribe it to non-human animals as well. He effectively uses a pathos and logos approach when he argues to his audience that that all practices involving the mistreatment of animals should be abolished rather than reformed, animals have an inherent value just as humans do, and emphasizes that unbridled Christian theology has brought the earth to the brink of ecological disaster.…
Through his experience he’s concluded that humans must learn to coexistence with nature. Thomas wants people to appreciate nature and believe it’s part of being human, and those who don’t are committing, “a debasement, a loss of individuality, a violation of human nature, an unnatural act.” (Thomas 565). He also learned about himself and human nature through his observations of Otters and Beavers, “I learned nothing new about them. Only about me, and I suspect also about you, maybe about humans beings at larger: we are endowed with genes which code out our reaction to beavers and otters, maybe our reaction to each other as well” (Thomas 564). Overall, Thomas wants his readers to focus on the broader picture when it comes to understanding nature. “Much of today’s public anxiety about science is the apprehension that we may forever be overlooking the whole by an endless, obsessive preoccupation with the parts” (Thomas…
In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, behavioral scientist Stephen M. Sivy poses an important question all individuals should contemplate. “If you believe in evolution by natural selection, how can you believe that feelings suddenly appeared, out of the blue, with human beings?” The human race is not significantly different to the point where we must distinguish ourselves from alternative species. Many people seem to be under the impression that animals exist solely to serve our intentions, regardless of the detrimental effects they undergo. We as humans tend to classify ourselves to be at the top of the species hierarchy due to our moral compass and superior intellect.…
The author tries to go against what the author of the book says. He doesn’t believe animals should have moral consideration. He talks about doing research in order to refute what the author had to say. He then asks himself if they do have moral consideration then why are we still eating them. He goes on and talks about the difference in pain between human and animal.…
Jeremy Rifkin in the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” describes how the lives of animals are all for the benefit of the human race and how animals deserve more respect. Many concerned and caring people believe that animals should be treated with love and respect. The reality of this is that Rifkin seizes to comprehend that the life without using animals as a benefit is highly unlikely and would just further complicate the already complex world we live in today. To some point I can agree with Rifkin, but highly disagree with him when it comes to how animals are only used for benefiting humans.…
He states that non-human animals are farmed for food, experimented on, and we as humans fail to acknowledge the suffering that these animals go through, because we are too caught up in our own ‘selfish’ behavior. Overall, his main point is that from a moral standpoint, humans should reconsider our modern practices, and give all sentient non-human animals equal consideration. He suggests that we all adopt vegetarian diets, and only conduct experiments on non-human animals when it would do less harm than good. (205)…
Nature is the influence behavioral development such as fetal environment, nutrition, stress, and sensory stimulation that has come very influential as exampled by the textbook.…
“We love all animals, it’s just people we’re not too crazy about,” is a comment made by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) (Fegan 1). This outrageous comment insinuates PETA puts animals’ rights before the rights and needs of humans, which is not the way nature intended. The PETA organization has been around since 1980 affectively with their hyped-up, illogical stories of how we need to treat animals as equals and grant them rights that only we, as humans, should enjoy. These are assumptions and claims which are used to further their cause and are not founded in reality. Contradictory to PETA’s beliefs, animals should not have the same rights as humans, because that is the law of nature. According to Erasmus Darwin, who stated “Such is the condition of organic nature! whose first law might be expressed in the words 'Eat or be eaten!”. (Science Quotes by Erasmus Darwin) I do not intend to condemn animal rights activists, since people are entitled to their own opinions, but rather discuss why this way of life may be harmful to themselves and others.…
Charles Darwin noted that humans have a number of behaviours in common with other animals. However, apart from the moral issues of using animals in research, Cardwell argues that studying animals can lead to ‘anthropomorphism’, which is the error of seeing animal characteristics in people and human characteristics in animals. Just because animal behaviour looks like human behaviour, that doesn’t mean it has the same causes.…