Preview

Ilm Award First Line Management 1

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ilm Award First Line Management 1
ILM Award First Line Management M3.10
By submitting I confirm that this assessment is my own work

Leadership styles:
Before we discuss what leadership styles there are it is important to firstly define what the difference is between management and leadership.
The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate people to follow them. Managers have a position given to them by the company. Their subordinates work for them to complete tasks and in turn manage situations as they occur. Leaders on the other hand do not have subordinates when they are leading. Instead, formal control is given up, as to lead is have followers and this is always a voluntary activity. Telling people what to do does not inspire them to follow, rather than to be effective they must want to follow.
There are many forms of leadership styles, but based on Kurt Lewin’s models from the 1940’s we will discuss the four major traits, authoritarian, democratic, consultative and laissez faire.
First, authoritarian leaders are best described as those who dictate orders to the employees and provide clear expectations for what needs to be achieved, when it should be completed, and how. The decisions are quick because there is no consultation or independent input from the rest of the team and typically they make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice. There is also a clear division between the leader and the followers and will dictate working methods and processes to their team. The problems of relying too much on an autocratic style is that it can lead to poor quality decisions because of the lack of input. Team morale can be low with leaders being viewed as bossy when they are unable to contribute ideas. This can result in high staff turnover as they will be unlikely to be felt as valued employees. However, this does not mean there is no place for an autocratic approach. This style of management is often used in an emergency or when speed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leadership and management should essentially come together. They are not in fact similar but tend to create the same complimentary effect upon each other. The two concepts should not be separated as it may not prove worthy in solving a particular problem. Management and leadership, both have different understanding of opinions by people. For leadership, the leaders are born within circumstances revolving around adversity while managers are created at firms. Leadership retains a larger scope whereas management comes within a confined scope. Managers only have to focus on dealing with workplace situations and held responsible for the actions of their subordinates. For a company, a good management produces an effective leadership. The internal and external affairs of a company can only be well managed with an effective management fostering quality leadership. Major decisions are taken by leaders and those decisions can be ambiguous or controversial under certain conditions. Leaders need to think in terms of creativity considering future within short and long terms. They also have to tolerate the sacrifices of their companions or of their own belongings. Managers on the other hand have to abide by the predetermined laws and follow the directions given by the company. They have limited powers and duties as defined by the company.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With these types of leaderships been different in the way that they lead a group they are suitable for different public services. For example, when fighting on the front line in the Army this is best suitable for the authoritarian leadership as you have to do what the leader says because by trusting what they say you are saving your own life by doing whatever they tell you to do.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My experience with an autocratic leader have not been as positive as a democratic leader as an autocratic leader is more a dictator. One in particular required immediate response to e-mails that she sent. Due dates were never given when information was requested as it was stated that if something was requested it was really needed the day before. You were expected to be on your toes at all times. Directives were given without consideration of the challenges that may occur for the team and no effort was made to discuss them or attempt to problem solve them together. You were just expected to get it done.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EA Brief 4006V1 v01 1

    • 3041 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Management and leadership are often thought of as the same within business. The fact is that each of these has a different meaning:…

    • 3041 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hcs 220

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leadership can be formal or informal. Formal leadership can depend on the personal skills of an individual or be reinforcing by authority and position. Informal leadership can be expressive in an individual who does not have a specified management role (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). Both roles are important to any organization that wants to form a good organizational culture and foundation. Sullivan & Decker (2009), address four leadership styles authoritarian, democratic, permissive, and bureaucratic, which have their strengths and weaknesses. Authoritarian has the leadership characteristics of using directive behavior and strives on goal accomplishments rather than relationships. Democratic has the leadership characteristics opposite of authoritarian as this individual has concerns with building relationship and strives for open communication (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). This provides teams to collaborate effectively with team satisfaction. Permissive leaders tend not to have a good foundation of established policies and works off impulses. The bureaucratic style of leadership lacks security and depends solely on the rules and polices set (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). This individual avoids decision-making and “exercises power by applying fixed, relatively inflexible rules” (Sullivan & Decker, 2009).Through the review of this paper it will explain the leadership style of democratic and authoritarian as they are applied to Pat DeCesare in her successful leadership role. Pat has been in management for over 30 years and has a successful track record of taking her departments to the next level.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At first glance, the terms leadership and management may seem synonymous and the temptation to use the terms interchangeably; however, there is a difference between leadership and management.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managers set targets and goals and monitor the outcome whereas Leaders develop and motivate staff to achieve the targets and goals set.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warren Bennis states "Managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing." Warren Bennis listed the following the differences :-…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managers direct and control. Leaders motivate and inspire. Stated another way, Managers get people to do what needs to be done. Leaders get people to want to do what needs to be done (read that again if you need to; the distinction is subtle.)…

    • 5037 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership vs. Management

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leadership is more of an art than a science. Whereas management is often thought of as a science in which a series of logical steps can be followed to implement whatever their job requires , leaders differ from managers in a variety of ways. Leaders are active in formulating goals and objectives for the employees.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A leader is one who influences the behaviour and work of others in group efforts towards achievement of specified goals in a given situation. Managers at all levels are expected to be the leaders of work groups so that subordinates willingly carry instructions and accept their guidance. Leadership doesn’t require any managerial position to act as a leader. The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they motivate people to follow them. Managers have a position given to them by the company. Their subordinates work for them to complete tasks and in turn manage situations as they occur. Leaders on the other hand do not have subordinates when they are leading. Instead, formal control is given up, as to lead is have followers and this is always a voluntary activity. Below i have outlined key differences:…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many different types of leadership styles from traditional, contemporary and emerging theories. As stated in Nelson and Quick (2013), “Leadership in organizations is the process of guiding and directing the behavior of people in the work environment.” (p.193) In keeping with the traditions of the past, traditional leadership is defined as a style where power is given to the leader. The traditional styles of leadership are autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. An autocratic leader is considered to be an authoritarian. They possess the power to dictate their willon employees and will not hesitate to do so if needed. A manager that uses this leadership styledoes not consult or allow their employees to give any input in decision-making process.Employees that are not self-motivated, who need structure, and need direction and motivation will thrive under this leadership style. The democratic leadership style is much…

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    understanding leadership

    • 4310 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Leadership and management must go hand in hand. They are not the same thing. But they are necessarily linked, and complementary.…

    • 4310 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The biggest difference between my perspective of leadership and management is the way leaders drive the people who work or follow them, and that sets the trend for most other aspects of what leaders do. Whereas managers tell people what to do. I view management style as transactional, and leadership style as transformational.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays