Preview

Immanuel Kant Double Action Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant Double Action Analysis
A second person that would agree with the idea of war having a different set of rules in the sense that war is more instinctive then that of a habit is Immanuel Kant. Kant holds the idea of the categorical imperative. Categorical is the Latin root to mean without exception and imperative means what must be done. This sums up the idea of one’s duty which Kant describes that duty is something one must do without exception. This idea of duty leans towards the idea of instinct because every person in the battle field has a duty to bring each other home at whatever cost. Sometimes that means possibly risking your life for that person, but I guess if you look at from a stoic perspective and use the principle of double effect the outcome should always be …show more content…
Part one is if instinct can be considered as a virtue. The second part is if war truly has no bounds and almost everything one tries to learn may not be valid on the battle field. As far as part one goes, instinct is defined as a fixed pattern of behavior in animals in response to certain stimuli. Therefore, one may not inherently habituate one’s self to become instinctively good. Since instinct is now a vital role in one’s ability to make both rational and irrational decisions, it may be assumed that one may act before thinking in the context of war. This is true since actions happen so fast that if one hesitates to think it may do more harm than good, causing a failure in that soldier’s duty. Sometimes it may not just be the participants themselves that effect the behaviors of war, but the idea of warfare itself as it changes to new meanings and ways to be fought throughout age. From Aristotle believing that his ruling of habituation leading to the overall achievement of the mean. Lastly, Carl von Clausewitz once said that war, “resembles a game of cards.” War in the sense is unpredictable, which leads to the instinctive behavior that is needed to both survive and do one’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To most people war is a way that we settle disputes with other nations, but they don’t fully understand the intricate details that go along with it. Its not just about the guns, gernades and tanks, it brings out different aspects of soldiers personalities and I think should be more focused on the hardships that individual and groups of soldiers endure. The horrific situations that soldiers undergo can cause different types of actions that they would take because war is contradictory. Soldiers experience unimaginable stress that can make them appear weak or strong. Which is the biggest contradiction that war presents; war makes you strong and war makes you weak. There are numerous examples which can easily be found in the book The things they carried by Tim O’brien. Two stories that demonstrate it best are “the man I killed” and “speaking of courage.” Looking back through history also farther promotes the idea, like when America created the atomic bomb, and started a draft.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The next dreadful thing to a battle lost is a battle won,” was once said by Duke of Wellington. Throughout history, many wars have occurred and have cause much change in the world. In the essay The Moral Equivalent of War, by William James, the same topic about war is discussed within the essay. However, William James, the author, seems like he does not approve the reasons and actions for many of the wars that have occurred. Furthermore, William seems to try to find reason and try to understand many points of view to go war. I would believe that William James would disagree with the quote because, even though he is a pacifist, he seems to try to find the reason behind going to war and knows that with winning a war, it continues to nourish a couple of human virtues.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book "The Warrior Ethos" written by Steven Pressfield is about what it means to be a warrior, in the present time, and also in ancient times. In the book it gives many examples such as the ancient Spartans as well as modern day war fighters such as the Marines. It also discusses the differences and similarities as to what the warrior ethos actually means to the individual, as well as to the unit. The author breaks the book into three parts, academies of war, the external war, and finally the last part, inner wars. These three parts essentially start from the ground and work their way up. The academies of war is basically giving examples of real stories where military members showed the meaning of the warrior ethos. For example, Pressfield brings up that in ancient Greek times, when King Leonidas chose the three hundred Spartan warriors to march on Thermopylae based on their wives and mothers. He knew they were going to die and he chose the warriors based on how their families would react to the war effort. Positive reactions from the families of the fallen soldiers creates a positive reaction in the populous. The second part, the external war, is exactly that. How we implement the warrior ethos in an actual battle. The author elaborates on how militaries that are born and raised in harsh environments tend to thrive when they go to battle somewhere else that is less demanding of them. He also discusses how battles and struggles bring soldiers closer and create a brotherhood that is like none other, in the sense that they will die for each other without hesitation. The third and final part, inner wars, is about what the warrior ethos means to each individual, and how it is almost always the same for each person. At first mentions that as warriors, we must always been mindful of consequences, because unlike civilians, consequences are very real in our world.And in turn, we must temper our "brute aggression" with…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    combat high

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reading “Combat High”, I had many different thoughts going through my mind about war. I understand where Junger is coming from as he gives…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War is possibly the most controversial phenomenon that takes place today, and it can be traced back to the beginnings of the human race and has always been a central focus in historical studies and teachings. Some people see war as indignant, while others perceive it to be a necessity, or rather an inevitable part of human nature. There is a fine line between the two, and while war should be avoided at all costs one has little to no control over the mentality or beliefs of others. In her paper about the nature of warfare, Mead states that war is just a bad invention by humans, and individuals should strive to create a better way of solving disputes by realizing its defects, spreading anti-war propaganda, and by pointing out its “terrible cost in human suffering and social waste” (4). This argument would be greatly beneficial to society, but in dealing with World War II this logic cannot be applied. No amount of reasoning or anti-war propaganda would have even fazed the Nazis or the Japanese, for the peoples who resided in these nations did not have the privilege of free speech. Speaking out against the country, or any attempts to hamper the war effort would have possibly lead to an imminent death. That being said, Orwell argues…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One important theory within International Relations shows a moral aspect on how to conduct war. This theory is called Just War Theory. Just War Theory is a doctrine of military ethics from a philosophical and Catholic viewpoint. This theory consists of two parts: Jus ad bellum (the right to go to war) and Jus in bello (right conduct within war).…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reading “What Is Enlightenment?”, is written by Kant. Kant claims that man does not use their own enlightenment because there are other people with higher intelligence that can make the hard decisions for them and, that, the people listening will obey. Kant supports his claim that mankind does not utilize their enlightenment because they do not have freedom, they are lazy, and cannot escape their own nonage.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Soldiers Thoughts

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zachary Scott-Singley wrote an essay called “A Soldiers Thoughts”. His essay was based on his inner thoughts and questions, how he should and shouldn’t feel about war. Is war right or wrong? Are these people truly the enemy? What would you do to stay alive? I feel war leaves these questions open to discussion and defiantly can change based on the person and the involvement; but the work of war can change a person’s values and morals.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world, but fails to account for how the world actually is, which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will not stop preaching peace; even thou it is unfair, it is better that the most honorable war…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays