Preview

Indian Removal DBQ Google Docs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
719 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal DBQ Google Docs
Moss 1

Braden Moss
Mr. Boyd
10/27/14
1st Period
Indian Removal DBQ
Ever since the American people arrived at the New World they have continually driven the
Native Americans out of their native lands. The decision of the Jackson administration to remove the
Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s was not the only viable decision
Jackson had in view of the issues, but Jackson had many reasons why he thought the decision was valid even though the Supreme Court said it was illegal in 1832.
Andrew Jackson wanted to protect the indians from harm by relocating them in an area farther away from the United States. In Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, he states that the
United States were, “ sincerely desirous of saving the remnant of the natives, and of maintaining them in the free possession of that territory which the Union has guaranteed to them.” Like Jackson most of the states wanted to save the last of the natives. On the other hand, there were some that thought that they were barbaric and a threat to the states. So, the government had to side with the opposing states to exterminate some of the barbaric tribes [Document A]. Jackson wanted to protect the Cherokees from being exterminated so he started trying to convince them to relocate farther away. Lewis Cass agreed with Jackson and Alexis saying that the Cherokees were, “A barbarous people, depending for subsistence upon the scanty and precarious supplies furnished by the chase, cannot live in contact with a civilized community.” He believed that the Cherokees were barbaric and primitive people and they did not deserve to live in contact and get support from the Union [Document E]. Jackson did not exactly

Moss 2

agree with this. He wanted the indians removed, but that was because he wanted to save them not discard them. The map in [Document F] shows where the lands of the indians was before they were removed, where they were relocated to, and the routes the took to get

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s presidency also focused on issues of westward expansion. Pursuing paths of “civilization,” Native Americans of the Southeast engaged in extensive agricultural and educational development. But pressure from white settlers and from the state governments proved overwhelming, and Jackson finally supported the forced removal of all southeastern Indians to Oklahoma along the “Trail of Tears.”…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    let him enforce it." Jackson claimed that the "common man" wanted the Indians removed and…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. According to a page about Andrew Jackson Administration in the Zinn Education Project Cherokee/Seminole Removal Role Play,the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Jackson forcing Natives to leave their land and move to Oklahoma. The purpose of this law was to get farmers more…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act called for the government to make treaties that required Native Americans to relocate west. Jackson thought that this policy was “just and liberal.” He thought the Native Americans would be able to keep their way of life. He was wrong. The Indian Removal Act brought a lot of hardship to the Native Americans. It also forever changed the relationship between whites and Native Americans. Before Jackson passed this act, he gave the Native Americans two choices. The two choices were that they could take on white culture and become citizens of the United States, or they could move to the Western territories and keep their…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It take at least nearly 30 years for Andrew Jackson for the benevolent policy of the government to agreement with the settlements Indian affairs. His relation with the Indian with policy is to removal the white agreements to pursuit the happiest with own community and the most important was to get rid of the last session of the congress. Their are the particularly advantages that they can both cause collision between the general and state governments because it can strike a country of disaster, having human raids of not surviving, and few savage hunters. The main purpose is in Jackson union speak and It can enable rapidly get rid of population around the world, losing wealth, and rising power. It will also separate the Indians from other race…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were in a foreign place. The Seminoles, Creeks, Cherokees, Choctaws, and Chickasaws Indian tribes are just a few examples of the Indians removed from their homes (Doc 4). In document four you can see that they all came from very different and unique lands and were all simply grouped into one territory. Andrew Jackson had no sympathy for them. He called them savages and recognized them as an inferior race (Doc 3). He also said that they had “neither the intelligence, the industry, the moral habits, nor the desire of improvement” to change their condition. Andrew Jackson publically degraded Native Americans everywhere and made his hatred…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Indians fought for their right to control their land which was roughly ¼ the size of Georgia. “We have a perfect and original right to remain in our lands without interruption or molestation.” (Document B) Georgia fought to have them removed saying that they were uncivilized and couldn’t assimilate into American culture, and that they made a contract with tribe leaders. In the case the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokees. John Marshall said “The Cherokee Indians have an unquestionable right to their territory until title should be extinguished by voluntary cession to the United States” (Document B). Jackson disregarded this ruling and had the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place where he forced the Indians west of the Mississippi River along what is now known as “The Trail of…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first reason why the Cherokees moved is because they kill a whole bunch of people. First they did the most gruesome thing possible, which is to scalpe men, women, and children…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The whole country was in fear of the Natives and what they could possibly do. The country needed to expand and the only thing standing in their way was the Native Americans and eventually the country came up with a way to relocate them. Indian removal was the solution to the country’s Native American problem. After years of trying to come up with a plan, Andrew Jackson passed this act to relocate Indians from the southeast to designated territories out west. The United States gained control over 3/4th of Alabama and Florida, as well as parts of Georgia, Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky and North Carolina after the relocation (PBS).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personally, I feel that Andrew Jackson should not have removed the Native Americans. The American Indians were on the land first, and were strongly attached to their land in a religious sense. The Indians did not at all want to “trade lands”. Jackson acted like a bigot and a bully, forcing out the natives because he felt that they couldn't have used the land as well as the civilized whites. Without the Indian Removal Act, the U.S. would possibly be much smaller, poorer, and weaker as a nation. Economically, obviously, Jackson did the right thing. Ethically, though which really counts, it was an atrocious, horrible, nasty decision. Jackson should never have removed the Native Americans, and Americans today should be ashamed of this decision.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document J people assumed Jackson hated indians and wanted them out and gone far forever .Jackson wanted indian tribes to have a guaranteed stay district west of the Mississippi . He mentions how the tribes have become extinct because of “persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain “(document j,page 61). Jackson wants to prevent that and give the indian tribes a permanent stay .…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trail Of Tears

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments over land, restrictions, and laws were common between the Cherokee nation and the government of the United States. The events that transpired after Andrew Jacksons Presidency and the Indian policies he put in place have caused Americans to question morality. In an article by Tim Garrison it suggest that the removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for arable land during the rampant growth of agriculture, the discovery of gold, and racial prejudice that many whites possessed towards the Cherokees (Garrison). The tragedy of removing the Cherokee Indians and forcing them out of their ancestral land to soon become part of the trail of tears was a dishonorable act made by the…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Trail of Tears

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act and the “Trail of Tears” was one of the worst tragedies in American history. It shows that the US government was forcing Native Americans to move from their homelands and endure great hardships of famine, cold and harsh weather, long treks on foot, and unfamiliar places with no regards to their safety, culture, history and wellbeing. Since the settling of North America by European colonists, relations between Native Americans and their increasing neighbors had been a bone of contention. While various groups were able to maintain peaceful relationships for a short time, the most general and often remembered state is one of hostility and disagreement. Both before and after its forming, the United States would encroach upon lands owned by Native Americans, ignoring treaties and guarantees made prior. In the more pleasant cases, settlers simply moved in and claimed land. In some less pleasant situations, whole tribes were killed or forced to move. The Native Americans had to leave their homelands, were forced on a dangerous, deadly journey, and shoved in a new land with which they were not comfortable.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cherokees 1827 constitution, defined the borders of the nation and said they could govern people in those borders, this was not for the people that wanted the removal…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays