Copyright and freedom of expression have an intricate relationship that is both reciprocally supportive and potentially conflicting with one another. In this complex relationship where both copyright and freedom of expression are ‘constellations of rights and interests’, whether copyright’s interference with freedom of expression is justified hinges on the question: does copyright in fact interfere with freedom of expression? To begin with, I will explore the role and justifications underpinning each right. Following on from that, by examining the relevant authorities and literature on this relationship, I will contend that copyright does in fact conflict with freedom of expression. However, this conflict is not so much a conflict where one overrides the other, but rather a compromise. This conclusion will be based on the core principles underlying the concept of copyright and the internal mechanisms of copyright law. Additionally, I will also explore the possible justifications for copyright interfering with freedom of expression in the event that an alternate view is adopted – where copyright and freedom of expression are in conflict, such that copyright interferes with freedom of expression.
2. The role of copyright and freedom of expression in society
Copyright at its core is rooted in two objectives; the first being linked to the entrepreneurial side where an author has exclusive rights to make copies and reproduce their own work, and the second being the protection of the author now that their work is available to be copied. Therefore, copyright plays a role in protecting privacy. It protects the privacy of authors by affording them with exclusive rights that prevent unauthorised publication of unpublished and thus private material. At the same time, copyright also functions to protect freedom of expression by serving as an incentive for the production of expressions that might otherwise be produced, and by ensuring the integrity of
Bibliography: A Articles/Books/Reports Adeney, Elizabeth, The Moral Rights of Authors and Performers, (Oxford University Press, 2006) 25, 26-30 Angelopoulos, Christina, ‘Freedom of expression and copyright: The Double Balancing Act’ (2008) Intellectual Property Quarterly 328. Baker, Carol, ‘Harm, liberty and free speech, 1997. Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2005), 261. Birnhack, M.D., ‘Acknowledging the conflict between copyright law and freedom of expression under the Human Rights Act’ (2003) Entertainment Law Review 24 Brandeis, Louis & Warren, Samuel, ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1890) 4 Harvard Law Review 193. Couto, Alexandra, ‘Copyright and Freedom of Expression: A Philosophical Map’ in Axel Gosseries, Alain Marciano and Alain Strowel, Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008). Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth, 1977) 273. Gewirth, Alan, ‘Are there any Absolute Rights?’ (1981) 31 The Philosophical Quarterly. Goldstein, Paul, Copyright’s Highway: The Law and Lore of Copyright From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox (New York: Hill & Wang, 1994) pp. 39-45. Goodman, Nelson, Ways of Worldmaking (The Harvester Press, 1978) Heins, Marjorie, The Progress of Science and Useful Arts: Why Copyright Today Threatens Intellectual Freedom (Marjorie Heins, 2nd ed, 2003) 4. Hughes, Justin, ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’ (1998) 77 Georgetown Law Journal 287. Landes, William & Posner, Richard, ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright’ (1989) 18 Journal of Legal Studies 325. Lindsay, David, ‘Copyright and Freedom of Expression’ in Kathy Bowrey, Michael Handler and Dianne Nicol, Emerging Challenges in Intellectual Property (Oxford University Press, 2011) 68. Mills, John, On Liberty (Longman, Roberts & Green, 4th ed, 1869). Netanel, Neil, ‘Copyright 's Paradox’ (Oxford University Press, 2008). Nimmer, Meville, ‘Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press?’ (1970) 17 UCLA Law Review 1180; Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, 2005) 295. Romano, Carlin, Copyright goes Philosophical (Chronicle of Higher Education, 2012). Shauer, Frederick, Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry (Cambridge University Press, 1982) 35-47. Vaughn, Karen, ‘John Locke and the Labor Theory of Value’ (1978) 4 Journal of Libertarian Studies 2 311, 318. Commonwealth v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1980) 32 ALR 485, 495. Eldred v Ashcroft, 537 US 186 (2003); Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises, 471 US 539 (1985), 558. IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 458 [28]. Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd [1999] FSR 610. Copyright Act of 1976 17 USC (1976). Samuelson, Pamela, ‘The Copyright Grab’ (9 Dec 2003) Negativland