Preview

Internet Surveillance Argument By Daniel J. Galliongton

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internet Surveillance Argument By Daniel J. Galliongton
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. A famous quote by none other than Benjamin Franklin, and although he did not live to see it, his words would be part of almost every argument considering internet surveillance. This ongoing debate is immense because many different people from all aspects of society use the internet, so everyone is affected by the outcome of the debate. There is no easy solution when it comes to the balance between security and freedom, but in the end the right thing to do is to allow people to not be monitored when surfing the internet as it is a violation of the constitution, very impractical, and morally wrong. The internet is a very new …show more content…
Galliongton on the US News site, you find that his main argument is that most of our communication is already being monitored, and that we would not catch criminals without being monitored. He says we used wiretapping to catch and stop organized crime in the past and that the internet is no different. That criminals and other unwanted people should be monitored for national security and the safety of the greater population. He also adds that the NSA only uses the gathering information when needed, like when a warrant is presented (Galliongton). He and those like him, believe that security is more important than internet freedom. That is not inherently wrong, and he is far from the only …show more content…
They claim that because there are horrible child porn creating terrorists on the internet, everyone should be watched in case they are one. The Power of Critical Thinking calls that method of thinking a “composition fallacy” (Vaughn 170). The idea is that one cannot create a logical argument by basing what is true of the parts must be true of the whole, and in this case the idea that a small minority of bad people can be watched legally, therefore all people can be watched legally because of the actions of a few. That is not the only fallacy used in that argument as a hasty generalization in which “The drawing of a conclusion about a target group based on an inadequate sample size” (Vaughn 191). It would be like hating all Muslims for the actions of ISIS, or seeing all blacks as thugs because a black guy stole your bike. In this case though, seeing all people as criminal terrorists because of the small minority of people that actually are criminal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If someone told you “You are being watched every time you use digital communications, “how would you feel? The majority of people would probably feel discomfort. Sadly, you are being watched by the National Security Agency or NSA. While they allegedly keep us safe, the NSA shouldn't continue to monitor everyone’s digital communications. It gets every tax paying citizens money involved. They violate an amendment of the constitution. Likewise, there is a major loss of privacy. They simply have access to too much information. (Pathos)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, technology has made countless advances skyrocketing towards the future. Thus the arguments about whether or not security is needed for this amount of power. There are many good aspects of the internet; including social media, messaging, games, and even dating. But, with these things, comes bad that we don't know much about; including catfishing, tracking, and also spying. With the click a button, everything done online can be seen by anyone.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indivdual Assignment

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Does the massive use of Big Brother surveillance technologies make you feel safer because it can protect you from crime, or less safe because of possible violations of your civil liberties? Will you be more careful now using communication technologies, knowing that anything you type or send electronically could be reconstructed and used to judge your lawfulness or your character?”…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    No, the NSA Does Not Spy on Everyone, Everywhere: Why the National Security Agency’s Data Surveillance Programs are Both Legal and Necessary…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The government should worry citizens, by hiring people to hack into their lives. The National Security Agency, NSA, is “inside” everything from phones to major websites like Google and Yahoo. The NSA is responsible for code breaking and getting information from phones and the internet. The NSA has headquarters in the United Kingdom as well. They try to focus overseas instead of domestically to prevent any serious crime and to defend the UK’s economic interest. Because the NSA doesn’t trust its own U.S. citizens, violates the fourth amendment, and made programs to “hack” us, the NSA invades the privacy of citizens and should be stopped.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Claims for this side and against the NSA are their collection methods being unconstitutional to the 4th amendment, which prohibits searches and seizures without a search warrant (Gellman). Examples being the fact that when Microsoft bought skype, although they stated that it was to respect privacy, the information on it was all ready for the government (Greenwald 112). The 4th amendment was made after all, the fact that privacy is a human right, and because it is just in human nature to act differently under…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world use social media sites. However, many do not realize that governments are able to use surveillance programs to spy on them. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, surveillance is the close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal and it can be defined as processes of information collection and processing. Surveillance on social media has its positives and negatives and people should know how to use it responsibly, critically and effectively. Surveillance programs endanger the privacy of each Internet user. The reason that surveillance is accepted is because it can help governments find terrorists and can help solve crimes. However, it is a concern for multiple people that there is no law or regulation on how governments are able to use the programs. Moreover, the surveillance programs are sold off the shelf to governments so…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We all want the Internet to be fun and safe place where everyone can go and enjoy the great benefits it offers. Pro-censorship groups do not want to see someone’s freedom of speech to be taken away from them. Every citizen is guaranteed even if it is on the Internet. Likewise, anti-censorship groups do not want children being exposed to inappropriate…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kerr, Orin S. “Internet Surveillance Law After the USA Patriot Act: the Big Brother That…

    • 2726 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Obama on Mass Government Surveillance, Then and Now, it states that while Obama was a senator he says "that means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens...no more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient." (Breslow) Obama then has his administration "collect indiscriminately and in bulk --- regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing." (Breslow) For those who follow anyone against national security needs to really consider whether or not they are doing so because the person is well-known and influential, or because they actually believe in their rights. Obama does not act as a…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If we can not depend on the government to attempt to protect all of our rights, including the rights to privacy they will not be able to depend on the members of the community. If the laws are shaped to balance the safety of the public against modern technological devices then enforced the public would feel more at ease with all the ways technology is being used today.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States of America has become one of the strongest nations in the world. Through the unfortunate tragedies that have occurred over the years, we as American citizens have overcome these disastrous events together as one. Since the devastating attack on September 11, 2001 America has come to be more precautious, knowledgeable and prepared for what could come our way in the future. Having a new conspicuous perspective the patriot act was established, according to the Department of Justice's their “first priority is to prevent future terrorist attacks”. The USA Patriot Act stands for ‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism’. By passing this act it has allowed the government, the NSA as well as law enforcement agencies to lawfully obtain and monitor the privacy of innocent Americans throughout the nation.…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Cynically but accurately put, Americans oppose public intervention or regulation if it helps others, but favor it if it helps them - take social security, disaster relief, public works projects, for example” (Meacham). There is much controversy over the issue of internet regulation by the government. Government regulation would allow the government to shut down website domains that either infringe upon intellectual property laws or endanger the United States national security. Internet regulation protects the intellectual property rights of recording, cinema, and entertainment businesses and also ensures a country’s national security. On the other hand, there are those who oppose internet regulation claiming that laws regulating the internet infringe their Fourth Amendment rights. The government regulation ultimately provides benefits for the common good of the people that outweigh the individual rights that it may infringe upon. Therefore government regulation and monitoring of the internet usage of American citizens is necessary to implement because internet regulation protects intellectual property and free market rights, increases the safety of citizens on the web, and ensures the effectiveness of national security.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Hillary Clinton’s landmark speech last year, "Remarks on internet Freedom", the net today promotes a more open internet with human rights. The internet revolution is further supported by the social networks services such as Facebook and Twitter, where people’s right of freedom of speech and expression seemed to be ungovernable. However, the ongoing Wikileaks has trialed and tried to expose the Australian government’s loyalty towards this principle.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays