Preview

Introduction to Burglary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1166 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Introduction to Burglary
Introduction to Burglary
Section 9 of the Theft Act 1968 provides:
"(1) A person is guilty of burglary if- (a) he enters any building or part of a building as a trespasser and with intent to commit any such offence as is mentioned in subsection (2) below; or (b) having entered any building or part of a building as a trespasser he steals or attempts to steal anything in the building or that part of it or inflicts or attempts to inflict on any person therein any grievous bodily harm.
(2) The offences referred to in subsection (1)(a) above are offences of stealing anything in the building or part of a building in question, of inflicting on any person therein any grievous bodily harm or raping any person therein, and of doing unlawful damage to the building or anything therein."
There are thus two types of offence: s9(1)(a) burglary and s9(1)(b) burglary.
1. ENTERS
The defendant must enter, or have entered, a building in order to be guilty of burglary. Whether there has been an entry is a question of fact for the jury. In giving them guidance, the Court of Appeal has held that there has to be an "effective" entry: * R v Brown [1985] Crim LR 212 * R v Ryan [1996] Crim LR 320.
2. AS A TRESPASSER
Reference must be made to the civil law in order to understand the term "trespass". In simple terms it could be said that D enters a building owned by V as a trespasser if D has no express or implied permission from V, or the law, to do so.
For the offence of burglary to be made out there must be a finding of civil trespass, but the Court of Appeal has held that a defendant charged with burglary must have mens rea as to whether or not he is trespassing. That is, the defendant must enter "knowing that he is a trespasser … or, at the very least, is reckless whether or not he is entering the premises of another without the other party's consent." See: * R v Collins [1973] QB 100.
Even if there is consent, if the defendant acts in a way which goes beyond what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Facts: A fire was evolved on September 23, 1981 in a log cabin due to a hot plate. The hot plate was left on with an accelerant and kerosene near by. The owner of the cabin, Henry Xavier Kennedy was convicted of Arson as he obtained an insurance policy for $40K on the cabin five days prior to this fire and police found evidence that the construction business owned by Mr. Kennedy was losing money, and Mr. Kennedy's alibi was insufficient to eliminate him as a suspect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A mere trespass to land or personal property was not a crime at common law unless it was committed forcibly or maliciously.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This scenario is clearly a burglary. Burglary is breaking and entering the dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony. (Roger LeRoy Miller, 2008) Some of the factors that make this different from the other two scenarios is the fact that it was done at night and she broke in with the intent to get that laptop.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The crime of theft requires only the taking of another person’s property, not the awareness that the property belongs to another.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not once in the movie was it mentioned to anyone that the judge’s house was broken into. “ Judge Taylor clumped to the back porch to let Ann out and found the screen door swinging open. A shadow on the corner of the house caught his eye, and that was all he saw of his visitor.”(Lee, 333) This quote is in the book and is proof that Judge Taylor, when home alone, had an intruder in his house and just left before he saw…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cohen makes a good case against the hypocritical reasons that the British gave for their treatment of the Native Americans. First, the British did not value the civilization they thrust themselves upon even though it had been successful for thousands of years. The "new world" was not technologically advanced like many European inventions such as the globe, and the black powder weapon; which gave the British the idea that their superior knowledge made them worth more as human beings. Submission to their rule was only alternative for Native Americans. Failing that, then force and treachery were a way to handle the "savages".…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This caused a reasonable person to believe inevitable entry will happen. The police had good reason to knock on the door with some sense of authority, which alerted the resident. When the police knock on a door the occupants had the option to open the door and speak to the police. If the resident opens the door and speak with police, the resident does not have to allow the police to enter the resident. The resident can stop answering questions at any time during the interview. Residents who choose to answer question and attempt to destroy evidence put themselves at risk for a warrantless search, under exigent circumstances. Evidence in plain view rule applies.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Property crime is a classification of crime that includes, among other crimes, burglary, larceny, theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, shoplifting, and vandalism. Property crime only includes the taking of money or property, and doesn’t involve force or intimidation of force against a victim. An example of property crime would be “A supermarket worker who was jailed for stealing hundreds of thousands of pounds of Asda gift vouchers "amassed a fortune" which she spent on luxury holidays, artwork and lavish ornaments, police have said. Jennifer Margaret Ward, 49, of Wigginton Road, York and her partner Alistair Gordon Lobban, 52, of the same address, were sent to prison for a total of three years following what North Yorkshire Police described as a "bizarre" and "complex investigation into theft and money laundering".…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    united states supreme court ruled that police officers that have a warrant to arrest someone can enter a home just to arrest the person only if they have the reason to believe the person actually lives there. The same standard was applied for officers when they are conducting a parole or probation search. The…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theft/ burglary is considered a triable either way offence meaning it can either be tried in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court depending on how serious the crime is. Depending on what he stole and how much it was worth, Simon’s burglary is quite serious, so he may be tried in the Crown Court. This would make it harder for Simon to be granted bail as because the offence is quite serious, he stands a reduced chance of bail being allowed. The court can refuse bail if they believe that it is done for protection of the defendant.…

    • 725 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the police have many rights and powers they also have to follow the rules too, police officers can only force entry if they have a warrant and they can only arrest if they see someone committing a crime.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is important to know the information about accessing a client’s home. For instance do we ring the bell or are there a key safe or any risks when entering the property.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early times, burglary was a crime of precise definition and only under certain circumstances were acts considered criminal. Furthermore, burglary was originally defined in the old common law as “breaking and entering into the dwelling or structure of another at night with an intent to commit a felony inside”. At present, by court decisions and regulation, the characterization of the crime of burglary has evolved to include many more accurate situations. To common law writers the above progression made sense because the expansion of the original concept of security of the dwelling was in response to social…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Burglars are smart, and they work really fast. They’ll patiently wait until they’re 100% sure your house is all alone, and then they’ll strike. These crooks are highly sophisticated, and they can even uncover your daily routine and plan accordingly. Contrary to what you would think, most burglaries happen during the day, and a “professional” burglar only needs about 15 minutes to steal all the valuable possessions you’re keeping at your house. Moreover, these crooks will take advantage of dark areas, landscaping, and overgrown vegetation in order to hide and wait for the perfect moment to break into your house while you’re away.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja 314

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The definition of property must be understood before a comparison of crime rates can be determined. The definition of property crime is consider a crime that a people commit that causes damage, illegal benefits, or interests from another person's property (USlegal.com, 2012). In most cases bodily harm might be imposed on a victim depending on the situation. There are many reasons that cause people to commit property crimes. For example, burglary is one type of property crime that could be committed. Other types of property crime are shoplifting and arson.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics