Agree people should change the driving age to eighteen for three reasons. Eighteen-years-old are more responsible, mature, and educated to be driving on the roads than sixteen-year-olds.…
Changing the driving age to 18 does nothing but change their age if you leave it alone and leaving the driving age to 16 with more practice time behind the wheel will give them some responsibilities and more freedom to themselves. Soon they will become adults and need to have their responsibilities in order to keep them up with the rest of the world and keep themselves together. Do you think the 16 year olds can learn responsibilities young or do you prefer safer streets with possible irresponsible…
I’m sure there are parents out there who don’t agree with raising the driving age to eighteen. They might think that this is a bad thing because they might need help running errands like going to get groceries or getting their younger siblings from activities they might’ve had. But in the end, would you really want your kid to be going onto the road not as educated about driving at sixteen, or waiting and driving when they are ready at eighteen? They will be more responsible, mature, and raising the age limit could be helpful to the teenagers life and…
In the article ‘Should the driving age be raised” by Shari Roan she mentions in her article that the rate of 16 year olds licensed to drive unsupervised fell from 24% in 1997 to 14% in 2007. As that result their is more novices on the roads at ages 18 and 19 mentions Scott V. Masten Accidents will happen we can’t avoid that role play in life even if we are super careful it will get us. There's a difference between Accidents and teens driving out with friends trying be cool by going fast ,those teens are the type of teens that need to be stopped and the police should be strict on. If it's not the person driving it , it's the person driving the other car. They cause danger to their lives and and to other people.…
Many have disagreed that the minimum driving age should be raised from 16 to 18. It should stay at 16. There are many advantages to driving at an age younger than 18. Various teenagers are unable to participate in extracurricular activities due to no available way to get to and from the activity, teens are able to get jobs and need a way of transportation without depending so much on their parents, and numerous high school graduates are younger than 18 or just turned 18.…
Should the age limit be raised? From 1995 through 2004 there had been 30,917 fatalities. Most were from the ages 15 through 17. Some argue that the age limit should stay the same. They think others should be punished for the ones who choose to irresponsible. Men of all ages are 77% more likely to wreck than women. Plus, driving gets them to work and school.…
Should the driving age be raised to the age of 18? My answer is no, because there is not that great of a difference in maturity between the age of 16 and the age of 18. I got my permit and began driving at the age of 15. By doing so I had almost a year of driving experience, with a parent, by the time I turned 16. I got my drivers license when I turned 16, and my parents bought me my first car. In my own opinion I believe I am a pretty decent driver. I have never been in a wreck nor have I ever been pulled over. My friend’s parents have always trusted them to ride along with me. I am a pretty good driver, but am I great? No, but no driver is. Teenagers are not the only people involved to car accidents older people make mistakes…
For sixteen years, teenagers look forward to the day they get the ultimate freedom: driving, but with this freedom there comes risks. Every day another life is lost to teen driving. Along with risking their lives, teenagers are also not mentally prepared to handle the consequences that could come with driving. They are not only putting their life at risk, but the lives of others. No mother or father wants to bury their child, and this would be less likely if the driving age was raised. The legal driving age should be raised to save lives and have more mature drivers on the road.…
Before the legislature makes their decision they should think about why 16 - 18 year olds are in more accidents. I personally think it is because of lack of experience. If a study were made, I would predict that it would show all new drivers tend to have accidents. Raising the minimum licensing requirement would only raise the age of the people involved in accidents.…
Teenage accident rates and mortality rates have increased dramatically over the years. Nothing that the parents do and law enforces will protect the teens all the time, especially from themselves. Teenagers do not realize the responsibility that comes with driving. They are often distracted with other things such as texting while driving. Most importantly, parents always worry about the safety of their kids on the road. Some people may say that the driving age should stay at the age of 16; however, raising the driving age to 18 will create safer and more responsible drivers. Firstly, teenagers are very careless. In addition, increasing the minimum driving age will allow teenagers more time to get comfortable with driving. Finally, the number of fatal accidents will be reduced. Therefore, the minimum driving age should be raised from 16 to 18.…
I do not believe the minimum driving age should be raised. A trend in recent years has shown that the amount of 16-17 year olds involved in deadly car crashes has been reduced, and 18-19 year olds involved in deadly accidents has increased. In states with Graduating License programs, the amount of 16 year olds involved in deadly accidents has gone down 16 percent. A GDL (Graduating License) can restrict teens from driving at night, with passengers, and it can make them drive with supervision for a given amount of time. This will give teens safe and quality experience behind the wheel. Since 1996, 1,348 fewer fatalities involving 16 year olds and 1,086 more fatalities involving 18 year olds have been linked to Graduating License programs. So, why would we raise the license limit to 18 or 19 when fewer 16 and 17 year olds, and more 18-19 year olds are causing fatal accidents (Roan)?…
Whether you start driving at 16 or 18 you’re still an inexperienced driver. It is better to be given the responsibility at a younger age because you will be more responsible when you turn 18. The responsibility kids have will decide what precautions they take when on the the road. If the minimum driving age is raised the age group that gets into more car crashes will raise.…
A great percentage of car accidents nowadays, are caused by young drivers, who are not ready yet to have the power of driving a car. It is dangerous to have a place where young reckless drivers do not know the importance of attetion needed when driving a vehicle. The driving age in United States should be changed to eighteen, to avoid young people to take a too big responsibility early in life.…
The real problem is people who does not know the rules for driving on the road ! I know young people age 17 that can drive better than a 50 year old adult, because study show that younger people have better eyesight than older people. Driving is deadly for all age groups and the age for driving shouldn't even be raise by one year, instead we should maybe let the adults know that everyone who is on the road is responsible. So age does not matter but having responsibilities and knowing what to do when you're on the road is.…
Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. Some teenagers at the age of 16 are responsible. Some 16 year olds are irresponsible. Also, all 18 year olds are not responsible and able to drive the correct way. The state legislature should not raise the minimum age from 16 to 18 because some 16 year olds have a job and need transportation, a few may not like to depend on individuals to drive them back and forth, and many teenagers like to do their own things and not always with their parents.…