Is Animal Cloning Morally Wrong Essay

In the world today, there are many of concerns on what is ethical right. One of these topics that is a big concern is the cloning of animals. Many people believe animal cloning can be extremely beneficial in the world, but others believe it is morally wrong. Although people around the world may disagree, scientists have decided to take the risk and began the attempt to clone animals, causing political debate. Although cloning is a personal bias and people may not believe in it, people have taken on the challenge of attempting to clone animals to see the possibilities that could come from it. “Cloning is a process that creates an animal with the same genetic material as another” (“Animal Cloning”). One of the benefits from animal cloning
is the transplantation of organs from animals for humans, called xenotransplantation (Gjerris, Mickey, and Peter Sandoe). Animals have organs that can be used for people. Although they might have an animal organ they can still function properly and live a normal life. In addition, another advantage of animal cloning is scientist can save endangered species and bringing back animals that have become extinct. This can help animals like tigers and pandas because their numbers are dropping significantly. The final benefit from animal cloning is the resources, milk and wool, that can come from the animals. Scientists first tried to clone frogs in the 1970s however the results were inconclusive because the frogs developed only to tadpoles (“Animal Cloning”). Even though the frogs didn’t work out, it didn’t stop the scientists. They kept on trying and were finally successful in the 1990s. On July 5, 1996 a sheep was cloned and named Dolly. The two scientists who created her did it by “replacing the nuclei of ordinary sheep eggs with very early embryos. The scientists coaxed new cells to divide, and then implanted the resulting embryos into female surrogates” (“Animal Cloning”). Despite the fact that Dolly lived a fairly normal life she suffered from old age symptoms while still young, commonly known as premature aging. Because numerous of diseases were developing in her, she had to be put down in 2003. One thing animal cloning is used is to produce resources like milk and food.
This causes countless of people to worry because no one knows the long term effects that could arise. Others believe the cloning of animals could soon lead to the cloning of people, which to some is morally wrong. ("Animal Cloning"). Those who consider animal cloning wrong believe nature should take its own course and shouldn't be scientifically tampered with. In addition, "the ethical concerns regarding risks to animals can be divided into two aspects: risks to animal welfare and risks to animal integrity and naturalness" (Gjerris, Mickey, and Peter Sandoe). Most cloned animals have problems with diseases and aging defects. Consequently, there is a debate for when animal cloning is right or wrong. Ultimately animal cloning has its pros and cons. It is beneficial because it can help people with diseases, produce more resources, and save both endangered and extinct species. However, there is a fine line of when it is ethically right. Both viewpoints have strong opinions and both viewpoints have strong standpoints. Even though cloning is a debatable topic, numerous possibilities can come from it. One day it could lead to the cloning of humans, but that won’t be for a long time because there is still a lot scientists need to learn and master before attempting to clone human
beings.