So many environmentalists want to preserve biodiversity, but they are not the ones that have to pay in order to do so—it is the landowners that are forced to upkeep and maintain their land if it is home to an animal that is on the endangered species list. These owners are angry that they have to use their money to preserve a couple of plants or animals that just happen to reside on their private property, instead of being able to just shoot it if it is being a nuisance (Ghista n.p.). If the expenses of saving these animals was shared among all people, I think landowners would be much more willing to cooperate with the environmentalists. If laws are changed and the costs of preserving are divided equally, then landowners should be able to deal with a little bit of inconvenience if it means keeping a species alive, and not directly being responsible for the levels of biodiversity …show more content…
National Geographic Society, n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. .
“Endangered Species Act.” U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 15 July 2013. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. .
“The Extinction Crisis.” Center for Biological Diversity. Center for Biological Diversity, n.d. Web. 26 Nov. 2013. .
Ghista, Garda. “Biodiversity – Underprotected or Overprotected?” PROUT Globe. PROUT Globe, 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2013. .
“Is Biodiversity Overprotected?” GeoWords. GeoWords, n.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. .
Johnson, Kira. “The Sixth Great Extinction: A Silent Extermination.” National Geographic. National Geographic Society, 28 Mar. 2012. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. .
“What Is Biodiversity?” Convention on Biological Diversity. CHM, 7 Jan. 2007. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.