Preview

Is Man Good or Bad?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1029 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Man Good or Bad?
Belle Scherer
Prof. Mitchell
Composition I, Sec 111A
March 1, 2011
Is Man Good or Bad?
Sigmund Freud was a psychologist who believed that the unconscious stores our instinctual desires, needs, and psychic actions. He believed that the unconscious hides one’s socially unacceptable ideas, wishes or desires. These unconscious thoughts can only be exposed to the person when they are "tapped" by special methods, such as psychoanalysis. You may be confused, thinking that I have accidently handed in my Psychology paper, but the truth is that my own personal theory of whether human nature is inherently good or evil is based on Freud’s theory of the unconscious. I believe that man’s nature is inherently both good and bad; man is born thinking only ‘good’ thoughts, but have the ‘bad’ in their unconscious, and with external forces the ‘bad’ can be brought out. We learn of the evil in us from our environment and after that consider both good and bad in making our decisions. After all, how did man learn of greed without being taught the use of the secondary reinforce of money? The works done by Mencius, Gandhi, C.S. Lewis, and Hardin support my theory that we are instinctually good, but our environment can influence us to act upon our evil thinking.
Mencius, a famous Confucian Chinese philosopher, believed in a theory much similar to mine, that human nature was inheritably good and by only external influences in their lives do they turn evil. Mencius’ thinking is exemplified in the reactions of others when they watch a child fall: they all feel alarm and distress, neither to win a friendship with the child’s parents nor to win praise from those who see them, but because they have an innate tendency towards goodness. He argued that if people just followed their original feelings, like the alarm and distress they feel when seeing a child in danger, they could continue to be good. However, with the bad influence of our environment, people could ignore their original

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sigmund Freud was the first to think of the suggestion of a large unconscious that affects much of our behavior. He believed in The Id, The Ego, and The Superego, and that those parts of our mind controlled our behavior. The Id, running on the “pleasure principle”, is desires you have that are not socially acceptable. The Ego, running on the “reality principle”, is rational and logical thinking. The Superego, running on the “morality principle” represses the unacceptable desires of The Id and focuses on blending into social norms. Understanding the ideas of Freud can give you a different perspective of yourself and others due to whether the person displays examples of The Id, The Ego, and The Superego, showing the many factors that can come…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good and evil of human nature is a controversial problem in the Chinese and foreign history, Majority of ethicists such as Laozi, Mengzi, Xunzi etc. published their own opinions on human nature, good and evil in human nature of the different answer to construct the theory system. The most significant influence about ancient Chinese history theory of human nature of is Mencius’s theory of "goodness" which I believe is the impressed content I learned from ancient Chinese philosophy.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people are born neither inherently good nor evil, but are created as blank slates to be constructed by childhood impressions and other life experiences. In my opinion, the concepts of good and bad are impossible to be natural instinct. Rather, these ideas are mainly formed by the guidance and direction from one’s parents, and also by observation of the environment, and how others handle specific interactions.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, in the case of nature vs. nurture, nurture is what makes humans do evil things. From boys living alone, trying to survive on an island, to grown men thrown into a psychological experiment, their environment is what causes their sadistic/evil behavior. Although it is true that people make the wrong decisions in life, it does not mean that they were born with a desire to do…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As mentioned earlier there are three stages to this theory which are; the id, the ego, and the superego. The id stage is the stage that is present from birth. This stage is derived from genetics from parents, and family ties. This stage is based solely on biological paths, instincts and urges. This type of personality is totally unconscious and you do not have control of it. The id is not affected by reality, or the everyday world. It engages a primary process thinking, which Freud though it was primitive illogical, and irrational. The ego stage is responsible for dealing with reality. According to Freud the ego formed from the id and ensure that the impulses from the id can be in manner acceptable in the real world; in other world the ego is pretty much what controls the id impulses. The last component of personality to develop is the superego. The superego is the aspect of personality that holds all of our behavior, moral and ideals that we learn from parents and the society. The superego is our sense from right and wrong; it is on charge to bring behavior under control. According to Freud there were two different part of superego; the ego ideal, and the conscience. The ego ideal includes the rule for good behavior, while the conscience is the opposite, it includes information that are view as bad by the…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the advancing ages of modern technology, few questions remain unanswered However, several mysteries still exist, which can not be rationalized or accurately determined with any certainty. One of those questions, is the eternally perpetual pondering of the human nature of mankind. The question remains, and is often analyzed, in attempt to determine if mankind is inherently good, or evil. This question is presented through symbolism in the 1954 novel by William Golding, "Lord of the Flies." The novel has been adapted into two films, one released in 1963 by director Peter Brook, and a second film released in 1990, by director Harry Hook. In whichever form of the story, many interpretations of this eternal question are examined.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    counselling theory essay

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dr Sidmud Freud saw human behaviour as a result of give and take between three parts of the psyche (personality). The three parts are the id which is pleasure, too much of everything and instance gratification. The ego is the sensible side of us and try’s to find ways of satisfying the id in a way that the super ego will agree with, and that is also in line with reality. The super ego is the moral part of the psyche; its punitive comes from our parents, teachers and society. It uses anxiety and guilt to prevent us from acting on the id’s impulses.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are also myriad examples showing the positivity in human nature. On the contrary, this may be due to taught values in society. One may argue that selfless actions done for other human beings show how humans may be inherently good. An example of an action corresponding to this theme would be an opposing softball team witnessing a girl who stuck a home-run collapse with a knee injury, but instead of leaving her there they brought her around all the bases, sacrificing their victory. The girls on the opposing team say sweet comments such as: “We just wanted to help her (text 4.)” and the girl with the knee injury says how she “would do the same for her in the same situation (text 4.)” One may think that kindness is an inherent property of humans or rather that society just teaches us how helping other human beings is the correct action to take in an event. Without a society to teach man what is morally right, man would want to do what is right for themselves so they can feel satisfied with themselves. Correspondingly, one may argue that “in most cases people will not do things to harm themselves or others (text 2)” therefore proving to be inherently good. Although this may be somewhat true, there is still a lot of violence that is present, even in today’s society. People’s inner evils may be at a chance of increasing due to the others around them acting hostile, therefore reverting their mindsets to their original nature. As explained in Hobbes’ work Leviathan, man “acts morally only when they are sure that others are the same (text 6,)” explaining how morals are put into thought only when others use them. Without the confidence that one is using morals, it is said that humans’ “rational behaviour leads [them] to attack others (text 6,)” which exhibits to how people may not do things to harm others when morals are present, but act more violent when morals are…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Studying the human psychology is an unresolved mystery. There is a huge debate on whether people are born good or evil. Psychologists, philosophers and scientists try to reach a crucial point in this issue. However, it is still highly debatable. Especially in the modern times, there are some people claiming that there is some evidence shows that we are born evil. This evidence includes scientific research, psychological studies, and the Christian idea of original sin. On the other hand, there is another opinion that says that people are born good. Their evidence includes theological studies, psychological research, and logical argument. It seems that there is more evidence for the second position over the first position. According to Islam,…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with Hobbes, I believe that Human Nature is evil. Throughout time humans have proved not to be the salt of the Earth. Time and time again humans do horrible things. Human Nature is evil and selfish.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human nature has sparked much debate throughout history. Some people think that human nature at birth is absolutely good and that all evil comes from postnatal education or the negative effects of parental or guardian interaction. This idea is evident in a Chinese saying which translates as "Men at their birth are naturally good." Conversely some people argue that human nature is initially evil, and provide an example by citing the observation that when a person is very young, he or she always and only asks for food and is indifferent to the feelings of others. Such a view interprets this phenomenon to indicate that human nature is originally selfish. It seems clear that Shakespeare may have favored the second perspective because in Macbeth it clearly shows that human nature is selfish, and even though postnatal education can change a human’s mind, it can only reduce or hide his or her selfish nature to some extent, and in addition, the selfish nature will most likely be present when it is activated or spurred by certain circumstances.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and the Unconscious

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In his essay, “The Unconscious”, Freud introduces a unique perception of human thought, action, interaction and experience. He details a state of dualism that exists in our psychical life in stating, “consciousness includes only a small content, so that the greater part of what we call conscious knowledge must in any case be for very considerable periods of time in a state of latency, that is to say, of being psychically unconscious” (2). He argues that although we are blind to our unconscious mind, it determines a greater part of our behavioural being and participates just as much as psychical activity as our conscious mind. Freud also adds, “In every instance where repression has succeeded in inhibiting the development of affects, we term those affects ‘unconscious’” (7). He states that the unconscious is where repressed desires are stored, ideas that are suppressed from surfacing into the realm of our awareness e.g. we recognise our emotions - we ‘feel’ - because they have moved from amongst the elements of the unconscious mind to the conscious mind.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is human nature good or evil? This is a question that has been debated for a long time. Certain people argue that the difference of formation of human nature is born, while others believe that the human nature is more determined by the acquired environment. The film "Rashomon", the great and thought-provoking work, through the adaptation and combination of two novels, mercilessly exposing the darkness of human nature. And its impact until now have affected people's moral values. In the film, people in order to beautify their own morality, to reduce their sins, to cover up the most authentic self, and then fabricated the different lies. People of different classes face the life of helplessness and despair in different social system, the ugliness of human…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people, like Mr. Golding believe that everyone is born with the potential ability to do evil, thus coming from our genes and hereditary implications. While on the other hand, Mr. Rousseau, who I agree with, believes that it is the environment around us that more determines our willingness to do evil or not.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays