Preview

Is Social Class Still the Most Important Determinant of Voting Behaviour in Contemporary Britain?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Social Class Still the Most Important Determinant of Voting Behaviour in Contemporary Britain?
“Is social class still the most important determinant of voting behaviour in contemporary British politics?”

Introduction

“The view that British society is divided into two primary classes is much more than a sociologist’s simplification; it seems to be deeply rooted in the mind of the ordinary British citizen.” (Butler and Stokes, 1969)
If this statement were still applicable to today’s society, then it would establish social class as the most important factor of voting behaviour. The question is whether British society is still as clearly separated into two classes and whether the members of each class are still as aware of it as they seemed to be when the statement was made.
Without rushing ahead, it can be stated here that social structure has changed over the last few decades and that class boundaries seem to have blurred. So what has the impact on the people as the electorate been and how have the main parties reacted to the changes?
The discussion of these questions will start with a definition of class, which seems vital in order to have a clear idea about how class and party allegiances are linked. Subsequently, different theories of voting behaviour will be briefly discussed, followed by an examination of the connection between sociological and political factors determining class dealignment, so as to finally come to a conclusion whether class is still relevant to voting choice and to what extent.

Defining social class

“class is the basis of British party politics; all else is embellishment and detail” (Pulzer, 1967)
A considerable amount of psephological study[1] has focused on the link between class and party allegiance. However, the concept of class is a heavily contested one and has been the subject of much argument amongst political scientists.
Marxists see society divided by major economic and social factors, resulting in a two-class model: the bourgeoisie, owning the means of production in a capitalist system, and the proletariat who are



Bibliography: Budge, I. ‘Party Policy and Ideologie: Reversing the 1950s?’ in Evans, G. and Norris, P. (eds) (1999) Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-term Perspective. London: Sage Butler, D Crewe, I. (1986) ‘On the death and resurrection of class voting: some comments on How Britain Votes’. Political Studies, vol. XXXIV Crewe, I Dearlove, J. and Saunders, P. (2000) Introduction to British Politics, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Polity Dunleavy, P Heath, A et al. (1985) How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon Heath, A., Evans, G Kavanagh, D. ‘Voting Behaviour’ in Jones, B. et al. (2001) Politics UK. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd. Norris, P. (1997) Electoral Change since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell Pulzer, P Sanders, D. (1991) ‘Government popularity and the next election’. Political Quarterly 62 Sanders, D Sarlvik, B. and Crewe, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment. London: Cambridge University Press Walker, D

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Class dealignment can be described as the relationship between social class and voting behaviour weakening, meaning that the electorate are beginning to vote for political parties which are not generally associated with their social class. The extract quotes “In the 1960s, Peter Pulzer concluded that, 'class is the basis of British party politics.'” The 1970s showed how the electorate strongly stuck to voting for parties based on their social class, and confirms Pulzer's ideas. In '74, 56% of the Conservatives support was from ABC1 classes, whilst the majority of Labours was from C2 and DE classes. The table in the extract shows how the percentage change of C1, C2 and DE class votes for the Labour party has decreased greatly – 11% for C2 and 8% for DE - which confirms the idea of class dealignment, as people from working class backgrounds such as C2 and DE have been more likely to vote for Labour in the past.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the period of 1945-1970 was seen as an era of electoral stability, partially due to the stability of the voting patterns and the strong party identification. Thus the party identification model was supported by this period as partisan alignment, which is the long term manifestation of beliefs and loyalties was prominent in deterring the way the electorate voted. Supported by Punnet in 1971 was believed “for most people voting behaviour is habitual and ingrained”. Also, it was noted because of the dominance of the two main parties; Labour and Conservative whom gained on average 90% of the vote in the general elections. The sociological theory was identifiable in this period, which supported the idea of class alignment as people had a strong association of membership to a social class with the support of a political party. Pulzer stated in 1967 “the middle class had a tendency to vote Conservative and the working class had a tendency to vote Labour”. Although, short term factors such as the election campaign has significance as the elections were won by winning over the “floating voters” in important constituencies. These are all long-term factors that seemed to shape voting behaviour most extensively, however since this period the dominance has been reversed.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are three main reasons to show why there is a participation crisis in the UK. The first reason is the public. Due to people’s interest in materialism, individualism and lack of community, citizens fail to pull together and look out for each other, which decreases the interest and connection they have in politics. Decreasing rates in party membership and electoral turnouts is part of a process that’s seen less interest in political affairs as citizens seem to care more about themselves and family rather than their neighbours and society as a whole.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fielding, S. (2003). The Labour Party: continuity and change in the making of ‘New’ Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics has certainly changed over the last few decades. The idea of British politics become Americanised is one factor in this change. In modern day politics it is obvious that the electorate have different things to take into consideration when they approach the ballot box. In this essay I will debate whether short term factors have more of an effect in voters’ minds than long term factors.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a significant decline since the post war consensus in the influence of social factors such as class and partisanship on voting behaviour. Class lines have become blurred from increased affluence, improved education and changes in the Labour market such as the formation of a ‘new working class’; resulting in the centralisation of the main political parties to become ‘catch-all’ parties, adapting their policies for short-term gain and effectively putting an end to the relevance of party ideology. This has led many people to the conclusion that short-term rational choice factors such as the state of the economy, qualities of the party leader and government competence are now far more important in shaping voting behaviour than long-term social factors such as class, ethnicity, age and gender.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most telling indicator of there being a democratic deficit in the UK today is the continuing decline of voter turnout at all elections for the past 60 years. There is a growing level of general apathy towards political issues in the UK which is not just damaging to the health of a democracy but fatal. The government requires a mandate to govern, if they do not achieve popular consent then how are they representative of the people?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a many ways in which citizens can participate in politics in the UK without necessarily having to vote for example: joining a political party, boycotting, and even signing petitions and fund raising. All of these methods provide political involvement without a democratic vote being placed. Participation in marches has increased recently as more people see the effects of this form of involvement in politics. However, there is an argument that there has been a participation crisis over the past years in the UK. A participation crisis is when less and less citizens take part in political activities; this can be shown in the decrease of voter turnout and the level of participation. This is in some ways a crisis as it means that some people within the population will not be represented by a vote, and so may not be politically catered for. This would lead to some citizens being favoured in politics as they actually affect who is in power with their vote. On the other hand, there is an argument that there is in fact not a participation crisis because the turnout of voting is increasing and specific forms of participation are also on the rise.The main concern about democracy in the UK comes from evidence of rising political apathy. Some people have seen this as nothing more than a ‘participation crisis’ Political Apathy is the lack of caring or strong emotions linked to politics. Politically apathetic people are far less likely to take it upon themselves to vote as they won’t have strong political views for or against any party. Deteriorating rates of voter turnout and falling levels of party membership despite there being opportunities for participation show evidence. There are three main reasons to show why there is a participation crisis in the UK. The first reason is the public. Due to people’s increasing lack of community care, citizens fail to pull together and look out for each other, which decreases the interest and connection they have in politics.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Teixeira points to individual, psychological, and cultural explanations. Then, Piven and Cloward indicate to government and institutional evidence especially within parties. Finally, Putnam stresses social and environmental factors including diminishing social capital and civic engagement that have contributed to the voter turnout decline. A major factor that the authors disagree upon is how large the role of education level plays in whether Americans vote. Teixeira and Piven and Cloward claim that education is an important variable in determining voter turnout and that those who are not well-educated often do not vote. While the two respective works offer different reasons for why the lesser educated Americans do not vote, they both agree that the lowest class suffers the most. This is true in terms of both structural and psychological reasons. First, Parties do not mobilize these voters and they know a lot less about the registration process and about politics itself. Additionally, educated people are more likely to participate in social connectivity and politics, and therefore aren’t declining at as steep of a…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DD102

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the purpose of this essay I will explore the view that social class is connected to the places where people live. This essay will show what sort of evidence social scientists draw upon to support the claim that class and place are connected by selecting examples from the variety of study materials from the ‘Connecting lives’ strand. I will begin by outlining what the term ‘class’ means with some reference to the links between class and inequality and the definitions provided by social scientists such as Karl Marx I will then focus on offering examples of the evidence social scientists draw upon to show the connections between class and where people live. The evidence I will draw upon comes from Sport England, Charles Booth’s survey of poverty in London, the Savage et al. BBC class survey and I will also briefly discuss Danny Dorling’s interview with Kath Woodward. The conclusion to this essay will sum up the nature of the connections between class and the places where people live, and the types of evidence which can be used to demonstrate these connections.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In some ways, this statement is correct, however, as society is evolving this is becoming less and less apparent. The change in voting behaviour based on classes started to change between 1945 and the 1980s, where the class de-alignment occurred. This was the decline in the relationship between social class and voting. After World War II, the distinctions between the classes became less important as the country had fought a war together, and everyone struggled because of it, no matter of their class.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as a decreasing number of people voting in general elections there is a similarly decreasing number of people becoming members of political parties and this is another reason to agree that there is a participation crisis in the UK. In 2010, only 1% of the…

    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Is Class a Zombie Category?

    • 5056 Words
    • 21 Pages

    ‘Talent is 21st century wealth. … It is the nation's only hope of salvation … Not equal incomes. Not uniform lifestyles or taste or culture. But true equality: equal worth, an equal chance of fulfillment, equal access to knowledge and opportunity. Equal rights. Equal responsibilities’ (BBC, 1999). This section of Tony Blair’s speech, given in 1999 during a Labour Party Conference, is one of many ways how one could have introduced this subject. However, this specific one points to something which is taken for granted, namely true democracy. If one works hard at it, this will one day pay off. This could be a starting point for what Ulrich Beck (2000) calls ‘zombie categories’. According to him, we are free from traditions and from uniformity and are striving for individualization. Hence, traditions die and leave ‘zombies’ behind, categories which are ‘dead long ago but still haunting people’s minds’ (2000: 80). One of these categories, which Beck claims, have turned into a zombie category, is class. To get a better grasp of what is meant by this and where Beck’s ideas come from we shall first seek to define the individualisation concept, on which the ‘zombie category’ concept is dependent, and its opposite - the ‘social class’ concept. Secondly, we shall give a general definition of ‘zombie categories’ and its implications. Thirdly, we will look at negative and positive aspects of individualisation theories. And finally, we will conclude that there is no ‘pure’ individualisation, which means that class must still to a certain extent be alive. We will thus be able to put forward a different approach, which seeks to include both individualisation and class as legitimate concepts.…

    • 5056 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voter turnout and political efficacy amongst a people are crucial to the proper maintenance of a democratic society. In order for changes to be made and the largest amount of voices to be heard, people must feel like their vote counts, and that a direct result to their vote is a response from the government. As former US President Dwight David Eisenhower once quoted, “The future of this republic is in the hands of the American voter,” and for this reason political scientists commonly inquire on what factors cause a variance in voter turnout. These factors may be socio-economic, do age, income, culture or religion play a role in who votes and who doesn’t? ; political affiliation, do democrats vote more than republicans, or vice-versa? ; or education, does a person’s level of education cause variance in their turnout?…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Webster dictionary, social class is defined as a group of people who share economic and social status. Social class is separated by one’s wealth and how they present themselves. James W. Loewen once said that “social class is probably the most important variable in society. From womb to tomb, it correlates with all other social characteristics of people.” Here he is stating that social class is something a person will have to deal with for from birth to death; it will develop a person and their unique characteristics (compound sentence). Social standings are ubiquitous, which makes the idea of this quote so intriguing. As the world becomes more complex, the division between social classes becomes more apparent…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays