Preview

Is the Death Penalty Constitutional?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1139 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is the Death Penalty Constitutional?
Capital Punishment: Proposition
Capital Punishment has been a topic of debate in America for many years. 38 states in America currently support the Death Penalty, including the U.S Government and the United States military, two forces entrusted with our protection. Capital Punishment is older than the U.S Constitution itself and our nation has always been able to manage or justify the reasoning of execution.
Capital Punishment has been a topic of debate in America since the 17th century. Although many abiding citizens oppose the death penalty, there are many ways for them to feel this way. However, there are also various supporting reasons for 38 states to consider Capital Punishment as very effective. Some of the pros involved in this long-fought debate are justice, closure for victims’ families, cost of inmates, deterrence, and punishment that is equal to the crime which was committed. In opposition, some of the cons are cost of execution, humanity, morality, religion, and unnecessary pain for the family of the executed prisoner.
The 1960s presented challenges to the fundamental legality of capital punishment. Before then, the 5th, 8th, and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution were inferred as permitting capital punishment. The US Supreme Court has for over 200 years, repeatedly declared the death penalty to be constitutional (except for the four years from 1972 to 1976). It based its decisions on two Amendments to the Constitution that specifically mention the death penalty as follows: The 5th Amendment to the Constitution says: "No person shall be ... deprived of life ... without due process of law." The 14th Amendment says: "No state shall ... deprive any person of life ... without due process of law."
The Supreme Court also noted that when the 8th Amendment was written regarding cruel and unusual punishment, capital punishment was a common sanction in every state.
Though, in the early 1960s, it was advocated that the death penalty was a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A third disputation of those who advocate capital punishment is that “it does not violate the US constitution.” One of these is Antonin Gregory Scalia, who was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 to 2016. In the article, “The Death Penalty Does Not Violate the US Constitution”, Scalia mentioned the Fifth and Eight Amendment to reject viewpoints of opponents who boycott capital punishment. The Fifth Amendment declares that “[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital … crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury … nor be deprived of life … without due process of law.” The Eight Amendment also bans the federal government from using cruel and unusual punishment. Scalia firmly proclaimed…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the death penalty violate the sixth and eighth amendment was a question that was asked, “Although there is substantial research about the nationwide operation of capital punishment, empirical research on Delaware’s death penalty is modest in amount”. The Delaware supreme court concluded that because the mercy statute” delegates to jury and judge uncontrolled discretion the imposition of the death penalty there is room for that caprice, whim, and discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty that now stands condemned by the United…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Assignment Crt 205

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The eighth amendment of the Constitution clearly states that individuals will not have cruel or unusual punishment inflicted on them (U.S. Constitution). However, today many of those opposed consider capital punishment to be the cruelest form of punishment. Unfortunately, for it to be unconstitutional it would need to be cruel and also unusual. The founders, undoubtedly, did not consider capital punishment unusual as it was commonplace in the day for crimes of treason and murder. When given as a sentence in regard to vicious crime, capital punishment is a guarantee that the criminal will not escape and again commit these acts.…

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Georgia. Was capital punishment a violation of the 8th Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment? The majority of the Court deemed it was not since “Capital punishment accords with contemporary standards of decency, capital punishment may serve some deterrent or retributive purpose that is not degrading to human dignity, and in the case of the Georgia law under review, capital punishment is no longer arbitrarily applied” (Gregg v. Georgia, 1976, p. 1). The difference between this case and Furman v. Georgia is that previously the Court had ruled that the death penalty methods as administered back then were unconstitutional, not the actual idea of the death penalty…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opponents of the practice most often utilize moral or legal grounds as the basis for their arguments or in some cases a combination of the two. Most often cited in the arguments against the use of the death penalty are the contentions that the use of the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This argument is the one which was used in the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia which alleged that Georgia’s death penalty statutes constituted cruel and unusual punishment and led to a temporary moratorium on the use of the death penalty until state legislatures came up with concise procedures, in the words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger, “legislative bodies may seek to bring their laws into compliance with the Court’s ruling by providing standards for juries and judges to follow in determining the sentence in capital cases or by more narrowly defining the crimes for which the penalty is to be imposed” (Banner…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On a 7-2 vote, the supreme court decided that the death penalty for the crime of murder did not violet the eight and fourteen amendment. Justice Stewart, Justice Powell, and Justice Stevens concluded that “The existence of capital punishment was accepted by the Framers of the Constitution, and for nearly two centuries this Court has recognized that capital punishment for the crime of murder is not invalid per se” (Gregg v. Georgia), our framers validated the use of capital…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman V Georgia

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The opinions of other Justices today have set out in admirable and thorough detail the origins and judicial history of the Eighth Amendment's guarantee against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishments, [n1] and the origin and judicial history of capital punishment. [n2] There [p307] is thus no need for me to review the historical materials here, and what I have to say can, therefore, be briefly stated. Legislatures -- state and federal -- have sometimes specified that the penalty of death shall be the mandatory punishment for every person convicted of engaging in certain designated criminal conduct. Congress, for example, has provided that anyone convicted of acting as a spy for the enemy in time of war shall be put to death. [n3] The Rhode Island Legislature has ordained the death penalty for a life term prisoner who commits murder. [n4] Massachusetts has passed a law imposing the death penalty upon anyone convicted of murder in the commission of a forcible rape. [n5] An Ohio law imposes the mandatory penalty of death upon the assassin of the President of the United States or the Governor of a State. [n6]…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Beginning with the history of capital punishment, this paper will explore the Supreme Court cases, which have addressed issues such as whether the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution allows for some form of capital Punishment. Under the eighth Amendment no person shall and ever will be deprived of life without due process of the law. Over the past few centuries the words cruel and unusual punishment have changed. When legislators created the Eighth Amendment, they did this for no criminal to be treated as wrong as they treated their victim. The United States Constitution allows us to interpret that a man can be executed, but in the most humane possible. According to the article “ The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The U.S Constitution.” It says “The US Constitution specifically allows for the death penalty to be imposed as a criminal sanction, and democratically elected legislatures—not court…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is not a violation of the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is when a convicted criminal is put to death by the court. The execution method may not inflict unnecessary pain on the criminal. The criminal sentenced to death can wait several years or sometimes decades on death row before being executed.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Thesis: Capital punishment is useless as a deterrent, morally indefensible, discriminatory in practice, and prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. Its continuing legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world. The Supreme Court should bring the United States in line with the rest of the civilized world and hold that death is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Summary: The death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminal activity. It is not uniformly applied geographically, and where it is allowed, it is used in an often arbitrary and racist manner. As a result, states have been curtailing the use of the death penalty, the Supreme Court has limited its application, and both death sentences and executions are down sharply. This is at odds with the recent efforts of some states to expand the range of capital crimes, and with national polls which still reflect a clear majority of Americans favor capital punishment. Meanwhile, momentum has been accelerating in the international community to abolish the death penalty, and the United States is increasingly criticized for failing to keep in step with other civilized nations in this area. Capital Punishment in the United States Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons. In recent years, the evidence has shown that the death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminals. FBI Uniform Crime…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is punishment by death for a convicted crime. American’s often consider it a controversial topic, especially in terms of its constitutionality. This paper aims to outline the constitutionality of the death penalty and argues that it is unconstitutional because it contradicts the Eighth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether the death penalty should be legal in the United States or not is a major controversy. People have gone back and forth weighing the pros and cons to each side. One of the questions many people ask is, “Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?” (Drehle, 2015, pg. 6). The death penalty should be illegal because life in prison is a worse punishment and easier on families, it uses up more time and money, people are wrongfully accused sometimes, and lethal injection does not always result in an immediate death.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays