Nik Maheran Nik Muhammad Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kelantan nmaheran@kltn.uitm.edu.my Masliza Mokhtar Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kelantan masliza@yahoo.com
Abstract Mutual funds in Malaysia have experienced a considerable growth over the last decade in terms of the number of funds offered and the volume of capital managed by unit trust management companies. A higher growth can be expected due to a strong participation in Islamic equity funds among Muslim private investors and institutions because Islamic mutual funds have high 'correlations ' with the Sharia (Islamic Law) principles of equity participation and the sharing of risks. Traditionally, the bulk of Islamic funds have been channeled into low-risk and modest return instruments such as Murabaha (short-term, secured commodity and trade finance) and structured medium-term investments in Ijara (leased assets such as aircraft-shipping operations and equipment or machinery). However, since the mid-1990s, interest in Islamic mutual funds has grown, largely due to a fatwa on investment banking issued by the Islamic Jurisprudence Academy in Saudi Arabia. The decree ruled that, within certain parameters, equity investment is acceptable under Sharia. Therefore, this paper investigates the unit trust potential in Malaysia by examining the performance of such funds by focusing on more aggressive equity types of fund by analyzing their risk and return. This is done by measuring the performance of mutual fund, that is the Net Asset Value (NAV) of nine equity mutual funds and the prices on market portfolio or Kuala Lumpur Syariah Index (KLSI). Based on the nine Malaysian equity unit trust under studied over the weekly period of 2002-2006 using the method used by Sharpe and Treynor, the researchers are able to formulate explicit measures of a portfolio’s performance on the dimensions of risk and return. The findings are indeed a bag of
References: Abdullah, F., S. Mohamed and T. Hassan, (2002) “A Comparative Performance of Malaysian Islamic and Conventional Mutual Funds, Pertanika, 8(2), 30-49. Annuar M. N., Shamsher M. and Ngu, M.H (1997), Selectivity and Timing: Evidence from the Performance of Malaysian Unit Trusts, Pertanika 5(1), 45-57. Bailey and Lim (1992). Costly information, diversification and international mutual fund performance, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal; 11(4), 463-482. Ewe, S.J. (1994), ‘‘The performance of Malaysian unit trusts in the period 1988-1992’’, unpublished MBA thesis, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia. 9 Leong and Aw (1997). Measuring unit trust fund performance using different benchmarks, Capital Market Review, 5 (2), 27-44 McDonald J. G. (1974), “Objectives and Performance of Mutual Funds, 1960-1969”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9, 311-333. Shamsher, M. and Annuar, M.N. (1995), ‘‘The performance of unit trusts in Malaysia: some evidence’’, Capital Markets Review, Vol. 3 No. 2. Shamsher et. al. (2000), Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds, Journal of Managerial Finance, 3 (2), 142 - 153 Sharpe, W.F., (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business, 23, 119 - 138. Siddiqi. M (2000). Islamic Mutual Funds: Equity Culture Among Muslim Investors. Middle East, 300 Soo, W. L and Ghazali, N. (2007), “The price linkages between Malaysian unit trust funds and the stock market”, Managerial Finance Vol. 33 No. 2, Pp. 89-101 Treynor, J.L., (1965), How to Rate Management of Investment Funds, Harvard Review, 43(1), 63-75 Treynor J.L., and Mazuy J. (1966), Can Mutual Funds Outguess the market?, Harvard Review, 131136 10