Preview

Ivan IV (The Terrible)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ivan IV (The Terrible)
Ivan IV (The Terrible)

Pretend that the greatest leader to ever rule your country wanted to resign. You would want him to come back, but the price of that is to give him complete and absolute power. Would you pay that price? The people of Russia did, and as soon as Ivan IV came back, he killed them by the thousands. Ivan Vasilyevich began as Tsar at the age of 16. He was a great ruler for the first part of his life. He unified, and vastly improved his country, creating a more modern government. Unfortunately, his mental state unraveled as he got older, and he was prone to violent fits of rage that would lead to his own people calling him Ivan the Terrible. During his time as Tsar, he conquered vast amounts of land, greatly contributing
…show more content…

Without a leader, his people begged for him to return. He made a deal with the Muscovites, that if he came back and led them, he would get absolute power and control of the area, with the ability to punish traitors and lawbreakers with confiscation of property and execution. This state he created was called the Oprichnina. When he returned to rule, he began executing all of the local boyars, who he believed had killed his mother and his wife and then started his reign of terror for 24 years upon all of the boyars of Russia. At this point in his reign of terror, he was four times remarried but still had not succeeded in recapturing the happiness that he enjoyed with Anastasia. Also during this time, through the Oprichnina, Ivan IV created his own private army to act as bodyguards and secret police, called the Oprichniki. The Oprichniki contained 1,000-6,000 men. He destroyed all of the major Boyar families in the area and not just the men, he ordered the execution of women and children as well. One of his worst displays of terror is the sacking of Novgorod. Novgorod was a very wealthy city and was a strategic defense point for the Livonian war. Vasilyevich was paranoid, and believed that the city would defect to the enemy, so Ivan sent the Oprichniki to pillage Novgorod and all areas around it. He killed thousands of families and left nothing behind. All of the lands that he claimed was given to his chosen class of gentry. He tortured his enemies and even friends for simply displeasing him. He boiled them in oil, cut out their tongues, and impaled them on spikes, starting at the top, the more the person moved, the faster the spike would move through them, and this was a very long and drawn out death. This and many other heinous displays of rage led him to be nicknamed “Grozny”. This roughly translates to formidable or sparking terror or fear. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He left Moscow threatening to relinquish his throne as tzar of Russia. Due to his very apparent paranoia he made it law that all law breakers and traitors with execution and seizure of property. 24 years following Ivan put in place what those call a “Reign of Terror”, that reign involved destroying the major boyar families in the Russian region furthermore earning himself the “Gronzy” translating to mean “sparking terror/fear” which is exactly what Ivan the Terrible was known for putting fear in people’s hearts. During that same time Ivan beat his daughter-in-law who was pregnant at the time, causing her to have a miscarriage; Ironically creating the Oprichniki thereafter, the first official secret Russian police…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (or Ivan the Terrible) was the ruler of Russia from 1533-1584. Ivan IV is credited for creating an absolute monarchy in Russia. He gained Mongol land for Russia and expanded the Russian economy on a small scale. Although Ivan IV accomplished these goals for Russia, he does deserve his nickname, Ivan the Terrible. Ivan IV was a very intelligent man, but many people believed that he was mentally ill. This would explain his violent outbursts and his infamous behavior. His troubled childhood might be a possible explanation for his outburst issues.Both of his parents died before he was 8 years old. After his parents death he was faced with constant danger and neglect, which led to him hating the boyar class and torturing small animals as…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV, Tsar of Russia is better known as Ivan the terrible. In the following paragraphs I will depict major events in his life and the role he played in Russia. I will also exhibit the many positive things that he did. As well as the negative things that he did to Russian society during his reign…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The majority of the population wanted Ivan back. He agreed as long as he could have the absolute power to punish anyone he thought was disloyal. In addition to punishment Ivan then disposed of their estates as he saw fit. After strengthening his position as absolute ruler of the Russians, Ivan decided on a new instrument of cruelty, the Oprichniki. The Oprichniki were selected by Ivan himself and were forced to swear him a personal oath of allegiance. They dressed in black and rode black horses. Most were ruthless criminals who would kill a priest during his sermon if that is what Ivan asked. Ivan recognized himself as the abbot and the Oprichniki as the monks. They had sacrilegious masses followed by orgies of sex, rape and torture. Ivan acted as master at these rituals pulling ribs out of men's chests with red-hot pincers. He would then throw himself before the alter to repent and finally read Christian sermons to his drunken Oprichniki (Bos,…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not everything about Ivans reign was "terrible." The code of sudebnik equalized the power balance between peasants and nobles. The code also allowed the people to elect officials to determine the fate of trials. This concept will be part of the foundation of American justice. America has jurors decide the fate of the accused. The idea of jurors was derived from the sudebnik code. Ivan is also credited with the greatest expansion Russia has ever known. While he had little to no success in the west everywhere else his expansion was unstoppable. During these conquest Ivan established trade ways and roads to increase Russian wealth. a result of Ivans conquests was a diversity of ethnicity and religion. The increase in diversity offered a richer culture to Russians and increased the size and diversity of the Russians arts movements. While Ivan had great success he also had numerous follies. His greatest weakness was his anger and lust for death and torture. Ivan killed of much of the noble class. While the peasants may have seen this as a positive thing it was the nobles that ran much of the trading and economy under the tsar. While Ivan expanded the country, he ran his nation dry. Towards the end of his reign he had many troubles recruiting men for the army. He also almost bankrupted his nation with all the wars and conquest he sought. Ivan also had many issues with his reputation among the people. He was knowing to kill for minor offenses and slaughter thousands due to his own paranoia. Perhaps Ivans greatest folly was killing his rightful heir Ivan. In killing Ivan, he allowed his mentally incompetent son to rule the empire after his death bringing upon Russia a dark…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan The Great Dbq

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1547, Ivan IV, grandson of Ivan the Great, was crowned the first czar of all Russia in the Kremlin's Uspensky Cathedral. Ivan organized the Streltsy (members of the army elite) to govern his districts and the Oprichniki (the first police force) to suppress a boyar (ruling-class nobles) rebellion. He controlled the largest nation on Earth but in his later years, executed thousands and, in rage, killed his own son. When Ivan the Terrible died in 1584, Russia was left in a state of almost…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Legacy

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The creation of the Oprichnina marked something completely new, a break from the past that served to diminish the power of the boyars and create a more centralized government. "...the revolution of Tsar Ivan was an attempt to transform an absolutist political structure into a despotism... the Oprichnina proved to be not only the starting point, but also the nucleus of autocracy which determined... the entire subsequent historical process in Russia."[20] Ivan created a way to bypass the Mestnichestvo system and elevate the men among the gentry to positions of power, thus suppressing the aristocracy that failed to support him.[21] Part of this revolution included altering the structure of local governments to include, "a combination of centrally appointed and locally elected officials. Despite later modifications, this form of local administration proved to be functional and durable." [22] Ivan successfully cemented autocracy and a centralized government in Russia, in the process also establishing "a centralized apparatus of political control in the form of his own guard."[23] The idea of a guard as a means of political control became so ingrained in Russian history that it can be traced to Peter the Great, Vladimir Lenin, who "... [provided] Russian autocracy with its Communist incarnation",[24] and Joseph Stalin, who…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His suspicious nature, and the loss of his wife, made his erratic behavior even more pronounced. Due to his obsession with revenge and justice, Tsar Ivan IV probably used the oprichnina as a “weapon in the struggle with the boyars and princely families” (Thompson, 2012, p.70). It was his form of punishment to those families for all that he had gone through. Revenge was the mindset of Tsar Ivan IV and it seems that he needed to exert all his influence and power in order to, in a way, conquer the pain he had…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexis Mikhailovich was the Tsar (emperor) of Russia from 1645 to 1676, relishing in a long reign due to his ability to balance the leading boyar families (which was exemplary as the Tsars were dependent on the support of the boyars). Alexis' first wife, Maria Miloslavskaya, died in 1669, but not before giving birth to thirteen children, in which only three survived infancy. One of the three children was a girl named Sophia, and the other two were boys, Ivan V and Fedor III. Unfortunately, both the sons were weak in physique and health. Fedor was very intellectual due to the excellent education from a monk but was terribly disfigured and half paralyzed, whilst Ivan was nearly blind and was physically and mentally impaired, also being disfigured.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I stated in the beginning a great leader is defined with three vital factors. Now that we’ve changed perspectives to move into the light of things, we can all appreciate what he’s come to have done. That being said Ivan the Terrible, was a substantial ruler because he paved the foundation for what Russia has become today. Ivan the Terrible reformed a multitude of Russia’s fundamental systems, established new offices of power, and paved the road for new opportunities. Ivan the Terrible is a solid foundation to Russia’s history and it is forever changed because of…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsar Dmitrii I

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    At the beginning of the seventeenth century Russia experienced a period of great upheaval that has since been called the Time of Troubles (1598-1613). The period was an incredibly complex period of intersecting political, social, and economic issues that culminated into this tumultuous period. During this period, the Russian Orthodox Church became the only social institution and political symbol that offered Russians a sense of continuity, unity, and stability. Orthodox Christianity played a fundamental role in the Russian conscience and in the absence of strong governance, many Russians looked to the Orthodox Church for cues on how to navigate the political crisis at hand. During the Time of Troubles, the presence of samosvanents, pretenders or royal impostures, became a central factor that would shape the Russian political landscape. The reign of Tsar Dmitrii I (r. 1605-1606) is an authoritative and exemplary case study on the nature of samosvanents within Russian politics and religion, and how by understanding the narrative surrounding Dmitrii I’s reign we can begin to understand the broader…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan began displacing noble families of their titles and start abusing his own family. His “madness” left him with the blood of his unborn grandchild and his son on his hands. He also blinded an architect. During this time he created the Oprichniki, the first secret police in Russia. The…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like most things in Ivan’s life, his death was eventful. In 1548, his health started to fail and he became obsessed with his mortality. In 1553 he had a near fatal illness that left him desperate for a way to preserve himself. He called on the supernatural to heal him maybe proving that he did indeed have an illness of the mind as well as the body. He tried witches and soothsayers to sustain him but none of his remedies worked. Nearing the end, he was more unpredictable and irritable than ever before. Ivan the Terrible died on March 18, 1584 of a stroke leaving the kingdom in a state of jubilance. Later, a 1960’s examination revealed high levels of mercury in his body leading historians to believe Ivan had been poisoned. But, despite that unsurprising fact, Russia was free from terror. But it was not yet free of despair. Ivan IV had left his kingdom to his remaining son Feodor who led Russia into the Times of Trouble that ultimately put Russia in the Romanov Dynasty. Ivan did horrific things but he was not a complete blight on Russia. In fact, he was an important character in its development. In his thirty seven years on the throne, Ivan gave the Russian monarchy power and authority. He set down foundation for a new Russian state that had not only gained new land but was influenced by it.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays