Preview

John Brown

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Brown
John Brown: Terrorist or Revolutionary? John Brown was a man starkly opposed to slavery. In 1855, John Brown led an unsuccessful raid on Harper 's Ferry in order to arm slaves with weapons Brown and his men seized from the arsenal in order for the slaves to free themselves. Because this was against law of the time, John Brown was tried and executed for treason. Due to his methods, many people labeled him as a terrorist; however, because he worked for a good cause, the abolition of slavery, John Brown can be seen as a Revolutionary who used forceful methods. A definition of terrorism is needed before deciding whether John Brown was a terrorist or not. According to the website Terrorism Research, the definition of a terrorist is a person who commits acts of violence to intimidate or coerce society or the government, especially for political purposes. Terrorism is a psychological tactic, wherein a combatant group attempts to cause a psychological impact and incite intense fear. The United States military definition of terrorism is: “The calculated use of unlawful violence or the threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological” (“Terrorism Research”). Terrorists do not participate in formal war; instead, they attack civilian populations or landmarks. Terrorists believe that they have no option other than violence when they are fighting a government. Peaceful alternatives are either non-existent or ineffective. Many terrorists act the way they do because of a firm belief in their religious values or ideals. John Brown believed he was doing the work of God by abolishing slavery. In the light of the above definition, and John Brown 's actions, he was a terrorist. In 1854, a major act was passed in the House called the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. It created the Nebraska Territory in 1853. The Act evoked a


Bibliography: Brown, J. (1834, November 12). John Brown to his brother Frederick. Retrieved from http://www.wvculture.org/history/jbexhibit/oldsouthbrownletter.html Brown, J. (1859). John Brown’s interview in the Charlestown (or Charles Town) Prison. (1859, October 18). Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/johnbrown/browninterview.html. Terrorism Research. (n.d.) What is terrorism? Retrieved from http://www.terrorism-research.com/. Redpath, J. 1860. The Public Life of Captain John Brown. Retrieved from http://www.libraries.wvu.edu/theses/Attfield/HTML/redpath.html.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In reference to your point about the Revolutionaries, I was actually discussing this with my sister a few days ago. Technically speaking, Revolutionaries can be considered terrorists--they tried to instill fear in the British government (for example, the Boston Tea Party) for political purposes (specifically protesting taxation). In fact, according to an article titled, "Boston Tea Party Was Act Of Terrorism? Texas Public Schools Teaching New History Lesson," some schools in Texas are even examining it as such. Specifically, teachers are instructed to read the following prompt to their students:…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was more of villain rather than a hero. John Brown did many, many bad things to America. John Brown had a lot of lawsuits against him, about 40 of them. Also, John had a raid on the Harper’s Ferry killing so much people. That wasn’t enough for him Brown went to cabin to cabin killing people at town, Pottawatomie Creek, killing at least 5 people. In fact, Senator Andrew Jackson, even stated, “This old man Brown …was a more than a murderer, a robber, a thief, and a traitor.” Therefor, John Brown is an villain.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was John Brown Outlaw

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Brown is a terrorist, a person who uses violence in the pursuit of political aims. Such include criminal acts against civilians’ committed with the intent to cause death or injury. He fought against a rightful reason in a terrible way, initiating fear in the people around him. Raiding peaceful town, murdering innocent families and Such He was no freedom fighter, more an outlaw. October 16, 1859, Brown revealed his plan to raid Harper’s Ferry, Virginia, a relatively peaceful area.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that John brown is a terrorist because he wanted to take a federal armory and use it against citizens and mind you American citizens for a just cause. I believe that even if his plan had actually worked in his favor there would be a mass panick and bounties out everywhere signaling to the people that this man is armed and…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    He also protested about other issues in that time. He’s writings prove that he also protested on them. “He did protest, as evidenced by remarks about corruption, women, Native Americans, and economic inequality in his writings.” (303) However, he believed that those other issues are possible to be solved except slavery issue and that’s why he used violence. Reynolds states that comparing John Brown and current terriorist is a misleading. “It is important to recognize that many of the social ills that later bred radical violence plagued the nation in his time, but he went to war only over the issue of slavery.” (302)…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A terrorist is one who sows terror,” says Elshtain. She means that the victims of terrorist attacks are subjected to terror, or great fear. The purpose of subjecting a group of people to such fear varies but usually aims to destroy the morale of a people in its attempt at some religious, political, or ideological goal. Crucial features of inducing terror are its randomness and its attack on civilians as opposed to combatants. This elicits fear in every person because they are afraid for their personal safety in their day to day lives, as opposed to fearing only for our soldiers. To determine who is a terrorist, we must ask who they are attacking. Do they mainly target combatants in the field or bases, do they try to destroy military equipment and are they open to negotiations? If so, we should not label them terrorists for simply being enemy combatants. However, if they are deliberately targeting noncombatants with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible, they are clearly terrorists.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many different definitions on what terrorism is, what a terrorist is, and why they do what they do. First off, terrorist are human beings with feelings and concerns even though they channel those emotions in a lethal way (Nance 8). They are organized and ready to attack at a moment’s notice (Nance 9). Terrorist use big or small acts of violence to put fear into people and win when they have your attention (Nance 9). Lastly, terrorist only fear one thing: Not making it out of the safe house to carry out the attack (Nance 9).…

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    What defines terrorism or freedom fighting depends upon a number of factors. Motivation as a factor in defining terrorism or freedom fighting is particularly significant as it forms the basis of Macquarie’s dictionary definition, “someone who joins in organised resistance usually armed against the established government, or the domination of his or her country by a foreign power” . Therefore it can be stated that a freedom fighters goal is to liberate oppressed people from foreign powers. Where as the motivation of terrorists might also stem from a want of freedom but also has its foundations in other sources, such as religious conflict, more personal motivators such as anger, frustration, hatred or more minor goals such as freeing of fellow terrorists .…

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media and Terrorism

    • 5261 Words
    • 22 Pages

    The FBI defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (Flaherty, 2003). We tend to think of terrorists as young Middle Eastern men, but they are only part of the picture. In the U.K. the IRA is a terrorist group, and in the U.S. the KKK can legitimately be described as such a terrorist…

    • 5261 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Terrorism

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    And now terrorism means a political tactic that uses threat or violence, usually against civilians, to frighten a target group into conceding to certain political demands. Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, especially as a means of coercion. In the international community, however, terrorism has no universally agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition. Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for a religious, political or, ideological goal; and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorist

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A terrorist is a person who advocates the use of fear or terror as methods of war. (Terrorist, n.) This definition is not entirely true, because there have been people labeled as terrorist who were not advocating fear. They were labeled this by the entity they were standing up to. “Does the fact that one side's "terrorist" is usually another's "freedom fighter" mean that there is no possibility of agreeing on ethical norms applicable to armed conflicts between governments and their opponents? (Goertzel.) In the case of this quotation by Goertzel, would not both sides be considered terrorists by the other, yet be considered heroes by their own? There have been many people throughout the ages who were labeled as terrorist or bad guys who ended up fighting for those people who cannot stand up for themselves. The media has the bad habit of mislabeling people as terrorist. They decide to label anyone who is a little radical as a terrorist. If Gandhi was alive today and repeated his actions, more than likely he would be labeled as a terrorist by Britain even though he is fighting for human rights.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both these terms are vastly misused. While politicians the world over have often discredit their political rivals by calling or classifying them as terrorists and their struggles as terrorism, terrorists on the other hand have always tried to justify their acts and deeds by calling and categorizing them as jihad, however, there is no reference in Islam or any other religion where jihad justifies the killing of innocent people…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Terrorism

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In my definition I define terrorism as actions or threats of actions against innocent people. To me this is a very important idea. I feel that terrorism works because it induces fear in the general public and people become afraid because they are faced with the fact that even though they have done nothing wrong they could be attacked. I feel that violence is never legitimate when used on innocent people and thus a terrorist is never legitimate because they are attacking innocent people and that can never be seen as a justified act.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism

    • 4171 Words
    • 17 Pages

    For this article terrorism is defined as: The use of violence to physically and psychologically terrorize a population by an individual or a group in order to draw attention to a cause, enact political change, or gain political power.…

    • 4171 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays