Preview

Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq
The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States. The Kansas- Nebraska Act was passed only a few years before the Civil War broke out in America. Many people think that the Kansas-Nebraska Act was one stepping stone that led to the war. The Kansas-Nebraska Act directly opposed the Missouri Compromise(“Kansas-Nebraska Act”). The Missouri Compromise created a balance between the North and the South. The Missouri Compromise stated …show more content…
Obviously, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was not the only cause of the Civil War, but it could be said that it was something that increased the tension between the North and the South (Kennedy,Cohen, and Bailey 434). The Kansas-Nebraska Act shattered the Democratic party. The Democratic party had existed for about half of a century, but now it was split over the issue of slavery(Kennedy,Cohen, and Bailey 433). The crash of the Democratic party allowed the Republican party to form. The members of the members of the Democratic and Republican parties had opposing views(Kennedy,Cohen, and Bailey 435). Later, in the election of 1860, the Republican party would team up with several other small parties to rival against the Democratic party. The Civil War began soon after the election of 1860. Therefore, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the factors that led to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed by Congress in 1854 increased the already building tension between the North and the South. It caused a civil war in Kansas and many people believed that it was one of the causes of the American Civil War. The disastrous effects that were caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act serves as an example of what could happen if people in America today were to become as divided over an issue as they were over

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Though "everyone knew that a heavy majority of the Kansas settlers were antislavery", the proslavery crowd made a tough fight. The reason for the struggle mainly rested on Buchanan's shoulders. The Kansas-Nebraska Act resolved for popular sovereignty, and its author, Stephen A. Douglas, wanted to take all measures to ensure this. He convinced Buchanan to appoint Robert J. Walker as governor of Kansas, with orders that "the constitution be laid before the people". When the people of Kansas rejected the Lecompton Constitution, a proslavery constitution, Buchanan still tried to ram it down the congress's throat. He upheld it as long as possible, giving the southern proslaveryites time to gain "fresh strength".…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 study guide

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages

    14. Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854- Advances by Senator Stephen Douglas; would allow pop. Sov. to decide slavery in Nebraska and Kansas.…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska act is best understood as the breakup of the democratic party. It was introduced in January 1854 by Stephen Douglas. He was a democrat senator from Illinois. He was trying to help the country spread westward to place himself for national power. to figure out a way to overcome the sectional disputes that were remaining in the aftermath of 1850, trying to do so to organize the territories between Mississippian river and the pacific coast. His main goal was to overcome all the debates about the future of slavery. His solution was Popular sovereignty, this meant that the citizens of each new territory would decide whether slavery was permitted. This violated the principle of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that said all the Louisiana purchased north to the southern boundary of 36 30 line Missouri would be restricted. There were plenty of democrats in the north who hated that decision; Stephen Douglas and Franklin Pierce worked to support this legislation. The northern democratic party was decimated and many of those former democrats migrated to a new emerging republican party. Once it was in place, it became one of the preconditions necessary for what will become the breakup of the political party but the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the compromise of 1850 created by Henry Clay had opened up the concept of popular sovereignty, by allowing territories to determine their own status. This doctrine allowed States to make their own choice on how to keep their Government and if they wanted to be a free state or a slave state. As settlers streamed into Kansas and Nebraska which were above the 36° 30’ latitude line, the question seemed open to popular sovereignty. The two territories were West of Missouri, a slave state and many settlers came from there along with their slaves. This turned Kansas into a battleground between Free soil and proslavery advocates.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caning of Charles Sumnner

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    destroying the efforts of slave owners to take over the federal government and ensure the survival of slavery. Three days prior to Mr. Brooks’ visit, Mr. Sumner had delivered a speech in response to the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, a bill written by two proslavery southern senators, Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass. Both Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass were southern democrats who defended slavery. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska act enraged Senators and Congressman from the northern part of the Union because it allowed both the Kansa and Nebraska territories to vote whether to enter the Union as…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 established the slavery line that allowed slavery below it and forbid slavery above it. It also gave the South another slave state in Missouri and the north a free state in Maine. Although each region gained a state in the Senate, the south benefited most from the acquisition because Missouri was in such a pivotal position in the country, right on the border. Later on with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, Missouri had a big role in getting Kansas to vote south because many proslavery Missourians crossed the border into Kansas to vote slavery. The Missouri Compromise also helped slavery because the line that was formed to limit slavery had more land below the line than above it. Therefore, slavery was given more land to be slave and therefore more power in the Senate, when the territories became state. In effect, the north got the short end of the stick and the south was given the first hint of being able to push around the north. The interesting thing is, the north agreed to all these provisions that would clearly benefit the south.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1854 Kansas territory wanted become a state. The only question left to be decided was whether it would be a slave state or a free state. Stephen Arnold Douglas, the Democratic Senator of Illinois, strongly believed that the people of the territories should decide for themselves whether they wanted slavery. He sponsored the Kansas Nebraska bill and said that Kansas should be split into two states Kansas and Nebraska and that the question of slavery would be left to the vote of the settlers. He called this principle popular sovereignty. The debate over the question of slavery in the territories became more of a problem than expected. Proslavery and antislavery groups fought many wars, each side wanting to gain control of Kansas so they could have more power in Congress. More power would mean more votes for or against slavery. The bill also had its flaws. The law said that the people of Kansas were free to decide on slavery but the territories were not sovereign political units so they were not entirely free. This also caused controversy between the two sections. The wars were known as "Bloody Kansas." Neither side knew it, but with each day of fighting, they were getting a step closer to the Civil War.…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act – An act that repealed the Missouri Compromise by deciding the issue of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska via. Popular sovereignty…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans today continued to debate whether the civil war was inevitable, but there is no doubt that the Kansas-Nebraska Act made the ghastly conflict much more likely. And for that reason, it should be remembered as one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in American…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas also took part in causing the Civil War. Bleeding Kansas was a war between the anti-slavery and pro-slavery activists. It took place between 1855 to 1861 (Ponce). Missouri was a slave state and Kansas had not yet decided to be pro-slavery or anti-slavery, and because the two sections did not agree with each other, that caused a war. “Yet the violence that broke out in the 1850s was an unintended consequence of the territory’s organization” (Ponce). President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in May 1854. Kansas could settle anywhere under the doctrine of popular sovereignty and allowed residents to determine their state institutions for themselves (Ponce). “While its geography should have meant a free Kansas, residents…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Again, the issue was temporarily put to rest. However, the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854 which was sponsored by Douglas, brought this slavery extension issue to the surface again. The Kansas-Nebraska act repealed the Missouri Compromise which meant lifting the ban against slavery in territories…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ap history frq

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act. Essentially repealed the Missouri Compromise, opening up the slavery issue to popular vote. The result of this was widespread efforts to affect the vote by fraud and/or violence. After this, there was little chance that anything short of war would stop the institution of slavery.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays