Preview

The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War
The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party. The Kansas-Nebraska Act caused a great amount of turmoil between settlers within Kansas. With the question hanging in the air whether or not the territory would be for …show more content…
If a person was caught, the punishment would include fines and time spent in prison. If a person assisted a slave in escaping, they would be given the death penalty. It also legalized the act of voting in a state that you do not live in in order to justify the Border Ruffians’ fraudulent votes. Although the votes favored slavery, the number of people who actually supported slavery fell in comparison to the number of people who did not support it. This caused anti-slavery supporters to elect their own figurehead and establish their own state constitution. This caused significant problems within the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In the wake of the Kansas Nebraska Act, an organization known as the New England Immigrant Aid Company, sent antislavery settlers into Kansas in order to stifle escalation attempts to turn Kansas into a slave state.…

    • 4459 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, there were some major Civil War laws of the Western Expansion, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort to conserve a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states, by the U.S Senate and the House of Reps. The slaveholding states feared of being outnumbered in the Congressional Representation. They feared because they would lack the power to protect their interest in property and trade. After much debate the law passed the Senate on March 2nd, 1820 and passed the House of Reps on February 26th, 1821.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska act is best understood as the breakup of the democratic party. It was introduced in January 1854 by Stephen Douglas. He was a democrat senator from Illinois. He was trying to help the country spread westward to place himself for national power. to figure out a way to overcome the sectional disputes that were remaining in the aftermath of 1850, trying to do so to organize the territories between Mississippian river and the pacific coast. His main goal was to overcome all the debates about the future of slavery. His solution was Popular sovereignty, this meant that the citizens of each new territory would decide whether slavery was permitted. This violated the principle of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that said all the Louisiana purchased north to the southern boundary of 36 30 line Missouri would be restricted. There were plenty of democrats in the north who hated that decision; Stephen Douglas and Franklin Pierce worked to support this legislation. The northern democratic party was decimated and many of those former democrats migrated to a new emerging republican party. Once it was in place, it became one of the preconditions necessary for what will become the breakup of the political party but the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He negotiated the Act that opened Kansas and Nebraska territories for settlement. It also advocated for territorial legislatures to have the power to decide on all slavery issues (Carnes & Garraty, 2012, p.354). The Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. Northern states vehemently opposed the Act as it led to an increase in the locality of slavery. In passing the law, the nation took the greatest single step in its march towards the abyss of civil war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Election time came around to decide whether or not Kansas would be a free or slave state in 1854. During the election, hundreds of pro-slavery men from Missouri came and casted fraudulent ballots, which outvoted anti-slavery settlers. So Kansas adopted the same laws of Missouri including “Slave Code.” This angered the anti-slavery forces which then concluded into a civil war of Kansas. This war will be known as Bleeding Kansas.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of all the events that happened in the US before 1877, the one event that completely changed the course of history was the direct result of the Kansas Nebraska act i.e. Bleeding Kansas. The Kansas Nebraska act allowed for new territories to decide if they were a free or a slave sate by popular sovereignty. It undid the compromise that was made in Missouri compromise, which designated a line of latitude to be the separation of free and slave states. The Kansas Nebraska act re ignited the differences between pro and anti-slavery sections. Violent events and fighting had become so terrible that it had to be termed as “Bleeding Kansas”.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas also took part in causing the Civil War. Bleeding Kansas was a war between the anti-slavery and pro-slavery activists. It took place between 1855 to 1861 (Ponce). Missouri was a slave state and Kansas had not yet decided to be pro-slavery or anti-slavery, and because the two sections did not agree with each other, that caused a war. “Yet the violence that broke out in the 1850s was an unintended consequence of the territory’s organization” (Ponce). President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in May 1854. Kansas could settle anywhere under the doctrine of popular sovereignty and allowed residents to determine their state institutions for themselves (Ponce). “While its geography should have meant a free Kansas, residents…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Bleeding Kansas

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas Territory became the center of attention in the battle between North and South over expanding slavery into the territories. Those southerners who voted for the Kansas-Nebraska Act (splitting the territory into two areas) assumed that Kansas would enter the union as a slave state. The Republican Party, however, wanted to repeal the Kansas-Nebraska Act and restore the provision in the Missouri Compromise that prohibited…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding kansas

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The opening of the Kansas and Nebraska territories in 1854 under the principle of popular sovereignty aggravated a lengthy political change in both Kansas and the nation at large. Rival governments had been settled in Kansas by late 1855, one backed by proslavery Missourians, the other by antislavery groups. Although the Pierce and Buchanan agency accepted the former, Republicans as well as a number of northern Democrats deemed it a fake imposed by Missouri “border…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stono Rebellion

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One effect of this law was that legislative approval was required for manumission. This meant that many less manumissions were put into action, as they were already scarce and difficult to achieve before this act. They also closed ports off because they believed the rebellion was due to the slaves being born elsewhere. Slaves were no longer allowed to earn money, achieve literacy, or grow their own food. The only really positive benefit of this law was that slaveholders were finally being held accountable for how they treated their slaves, and fines were supposedly given for abusing and overworking slaves. But this rule was obviously ignored for the most part, as the brutal mistreatment of slaves over the course of their long enslavement period is well-documented.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was supposed to settle the issues between the Northern and Southern United States. In the immediate passage people fled to Canada because it offered more liberties than the United States resulting in “the number of blacks f[alling] from 13,815 to 11,840, the lowest figure since the end of slavery in the state." (Foner 136). This fell in part because the law “"reinvigorated and radicalized the underground railroad." to help more blacks to earn their freedom (Foner 145). Many abolitionist groups who kept records of helping fugitives burned their papers to avoid punishment. The law forced those neutral in the abolitionist movement to choose the law over their opinions and help local law enforcement find fugitives (Foner 26).…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays