Preview

Bleeding Kansas Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bleeding Kansas Research Paper
Bleeding Kansas is the phrase that represents the duration of the disturbance during the settling of the Kansas territory. Because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the residents now had to determine whether the area would become a free or slave state. Since there was so much dispute between pro-slavery and anti-slavery people, a war developed inside Kansas.
Election time came around to decide whether or not Kansas would be a free or slave state in 1854. During the election, hundreds of pro-slavery men from Missouri came and casted fraudulent ballots, which outvoted anti-slavery settlers. So Kansas adopted the same laws of Missouri including “Slave Code.” This angered the anti-slavery forces which then concluded into a civil war of Kansas. This war will be known as Bleeding Kansas. …show more content…

In May 1856, a pro-slavery mob attacked a free soil stronghold in Lawrence. They burned down public buildings and homes. There was also the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre, where abolitionist forces attacked a small pro-slavery settlement in Pott. Creek. 5 men were executed. After this, the war lasted another 4 months. The new governor, John Geary, managed to send Missourians home in 1856. Frail tranquility followed, but violent attacks continued for several more years.
Therefore, Bleeding Kansas was a huge conflict in Kansas’ history. Bleeding Kansas caused more hatred between the North and South. It was also a factor in helping bring about the Civil

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kansas Pro-Slavery Argumentative Analysis
    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kansas Pro-Slavery Argumentative Analysis

    In 1856 a law was passed that Kansas and Nebraska were able to vote on whether or not or not to be a slave state. Kansas was the first to get all their votes in and it ultimately ended up being a slave state. John Brown and the anti-slavery advocates did not like the results of Kansas now being a slave state. In response to Kansas being a slave state they made a “Lawrence Kansas” which is ultimately a free-settlement in the territory of Kansas. Pro-slavery advocates did not like that they did this so they went to Lawrence Kansas and burnt the town to the ground. John Brown and his anti-slavery advocates despised that they did this to innocent people. So, he got revenge for the burning of the city by killing five pro-slavery supporters next…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    Kansas­Nebraska act was established to end the conflict of slavery in the new territories, but…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Henry Clay Support The Compromise Of 1850
    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Henry Clay Support The Compromise Of 1850

    As the compromise of 1850 created by Henry Clay had opened up the concept of popular sovereignty, by allowing territories to determine their own status. This doctrine allowed States to make their own choice on how to keep their Government and if they wanted to be a free state or a slave state. As settlers streamed into Kansas and Nebraska which were above the 36° 30’ latitude line, the question seemed open to popular sovereignty. The two territories were West of Missouri, a slave state and many settlers came from there along with their slaves. This turned Kansas into a battleground between Free soil and proslavery advocates.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision: The Institution of Slavery in Politics
    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Dred Scott Decision: The Institution of Slavery in Politics

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise Analysis
    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Analysis

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act created two new states, but they were voted upon using popular sovereignty. Rather than having them be free state and slave state by the Missouri Compromise, it was decided that the citizens would vote on it. This was known as popular sovereignty (voting on whether or not the state would be free or slave state), and people from the north and south came up to…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act caused a great amount of turmoil between settlers within Kansas. With the question hanging in the air whether or not the territory would be for…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dred Scott Case

    After having freedom the Missouri Supreme Court reversed the decision of the previous court. Scot had too now take this to federal court to continue to fight for freedom which had been given then revoked. The North saw this as taking away a person's human rights. The south viewed this as a giant win for a twisted ideology. The circuit court upheld the Missouri supreme court's decision. Now the final frontier was…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Causes Of Myall Creek Massacre
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Causes Of Myall Creek Massacre

    What was the result of the Myall creek massacre and how did it affect the rights and freedoms of…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Could The Mexican-American Civil War Been Avoided?
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Could The Mexican-American Civil War Been Avoided?

    The Missouri Compromise affected the start of the Civil War for different reasons. The major reason was that it divided where slavery was legal or not at a line, known as the 36o30’ line, 36th parallel, or the Mason Dixon line. When Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine entered as a free state. The 36th parallel separated the North from the South, making the North all free states, and the South all slave states. The North and South basically became their own separate countries, but ruled by the same government. Many people wanted to break away from their slave state, and move to a free state, which caused the outbreak of the Civil War.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    What Role Did Kansas Play In The Civil War
    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Role Did Kansas Play In The Civil War

    Kansas played a big role in the Civil War before and after it became a state. While Kansas was becoming a state, there was an outrage on slavery in the United States. The Northern states fought for anti-slavery while the Southern states wanted to include slavery in the state. Kansas had many battles while in the Civil War, and the brave men of Kansas fought hard and long to protect their wives and children living with them in their state. Although many people were trying to make Kansas a confederate state, the men fighting would not let that happen.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding kansas
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bleeding kansas

    Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sacking Of Lawrence Essay
    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sacking Of Lawrence Essay

    The Sacking of Lawrence refers to the ransacking of the town of Lawrence in Kansas on May 21, 1856. The event is well known throughout history because it is one of the few blatant pro-slavery attacks that occurred just before the Civil War. The period was characterized by rampant slavery and torture of the minority groups living in Northern America. There were many plantations in the country and other activities that called for intensive labor. Slavery was a solution to the growing needs of the emerging nation.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Kansas Bleeding Kansas
    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kansas Bleeding Kansas

    Bleeding Kansas is a term used to describe the period of violence during the settling of the Kansas territory. The period of violence in 1854 is called, "The Bleeding Kansas". The Missouri Compromise was overturned and became the "Kansas-Nebraska Act. This new act would let the residents decide whether the area would become a slave state or a free state. Of all the Union States Kansas suffered the most casualties because of the issues of slavery being divided. Free-state settlers and proslavery settlers went to Kansas to help decide the decision. The Republican Party opposed slavery which promoted the Democrats to conform with the Republicans. The political fight over slavery is what led to the civil conflict in Kansas.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More