Preview

Civil War Bleeding Kansas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Bleeding Kansas
Bleeding Kansas

Before the Civil War, the territory of Kansas was unsettled as a slave state or a free state. This caused a conflict over who should settle this territory, right before the Civil War. This conflict was also called “Bleeding Kansas”. Later on, popular sovereignty, played a key role before the Civil War. The Kansas Territory became the center of attention in the battle between North and South over expanding slavery into the territories. Those southerners who voted for the Kansas-Nebraska Act (splitting the territory into two areas) assumed that Kansas would enter the union as a slave state. The Republican Party, however, wanted to repeal the Kansas-Nebraska Act and restore the provision in the Missouri Compromise that prohibited
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Fly's West Play Synopsis
    • 10126 Words
    • 41 Pages

    Fly's West Play Synopsis

    their designation as either free or slave states. The destiny of Kansas, however, had been tied…

    • 10126 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Reasons For The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Political Reasons For The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    The Kansas-Nebraska act is best understood as the breakup of the democratic party. It was introduced in January 1854 by Stephen Douglas. He was a democrat senator from Illinois. He was trying to help the country spread westward to place himself for national power. to figure out a way to overcome the sectional disputes that were remaining in the aftermath of 1850, trying to do so to organize the territories between Mississippian river and the pacific coast. His main goal was to overcome all the debates about the future of slavery. His solution was Popular sovereignty, this meant that the citizens of each new territory would decide whether slavery was permitted. This violated the principle of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that said all the Louisiana purchased north to the southern boundary of 36 30 line Missouri would be restricted. There were plenty of democrats in the north who hated that decision; Stephen Douglas and Franklin Pierce worked to support this legislation. The northern democratic party was decimated and many of those former democrats migrated to a new emerging republican party. Once it was in place, it became one of the preconditions necessary for what will become the breakup of the political party but the…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Henry Clay Support The Compromise Of 1850
    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Henry Clay Support The Compromise Of 1850

    As the compromise of 1850 created by Henry Clay had opened up the concept of popular sovereignty, by allowing territories to determine their own status. This doctrine allowed States to make their own choice on how to keep their Government and if they wanted to be a free state or a slave state. As settlers streamed into Kansas and Nebraska which were above the 36° 30’ latitude line, the question seemed open to popular sovereignty. The two territories were West of Missouri, a slave state and many settlers came from there along with their slaves. This turned Kansas into a battleground between Free soil and proslavery advocates.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Caning of Charles Sumnner
    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Caning of Charles Sumnner

    destroying the efforts of slave owners to take over the federal government and ensure the survival of slavery. Three days prior to Mr. Brooks’ visit, Mr. Sumner had delivered a speech in response to the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, a bill written by two proslavery southern senators, Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass. Both Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass were southern democrats who defended slavery. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska act enraged Senators and Congressman from the northern part of the Union because it allowed both the Kansa and Nebraska territories to vote whether to enter the Union as…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision: The Institution of Slavery in Politics
    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Dred Scott Decision: The Institution of Slavery in Politics

    The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act created two new states, but they were voted upon using popular sovereignty. Rather than having them be free state and slave state by the Missouri Compromise, it was decided that the citizens would vote on it. This was known as popular sovereignty (voting on whether or not the state would be free or slave state), and people from the north and south came up to…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How The Difference In The Northern And Southern Economic Muscle
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How The Difference In The Northern And Southern Economic Muscle

    He negotiated the Act that opened Kansas and Nebraska territories for settlement. It also advocated for territorial legislatures to have the power to decide on all slavery issues (Carnes & Garraty, 2012, p.354). The Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. Northern states vehemently opposed the Act as it led to an increase in the locality of slavery. In passing the law, the nation took the greatest single step in its march towards the abyss of civil war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas Research Paper
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas Research Paper

    Election time came around to decide whether or not Kansas would be a free or slave state in 1854. During the election, hundreds of pro-slavery men from Missouri came and casted fraudulent ballots, which outvoted anti-slavery settlers. So Kansas adopted the same laws of Missouri including “Slave Code.” This angered the anti-slavery forces which then concluded into a civil war of Kansas. This war will be known as Bleeding Kansas.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    What Role Did Kansas Play In The Civil War
    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Role Did Kansas Play In The Civil War

    Kansas was stuck in between the Confederates of the South and the Union of the North. Kansas got in a few skirmish’s trying to defend itself as a free state against all the other states trying…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas Essay Example
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bleeding Kansas Essay Example

    “Bleeding Kansas” was a term used by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune to describe the violence between pro and antislavery forces in the Kansas territory during the mid and late 1850s. The blame of who is responsible for this violence is placed on both sides yet it seems that the South should take more responsibility for the violence there. First off, the south starts the violence with no incitement from the North at the Raid on Lawrence. Then there was the Sumner-Brooks issue after Sumner delivered a insulting speech agains pro-slavery groups. Although the South started the violence, the North did have some responsibility. They retaliate after the Raid on Lawrence and cause deaths.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Kansas Bleeding Kansas
    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kansas Bleeding Kansas

    Bleeding Kansas is a term used to describe the period of violence during the settling of the Kansas territory. The period of violence in 1854 is called, "The Bleeding Kansas". The Missouri Compromise was overturned and became the "Kansas-Nebraska Act. This new act would let the residents decide whether the area would become a slave state or a free state. Of all the Union States Kansas suffered the most casualties because of the issues of slavery being divided. Free-state settlers and proslavery settlers went to Kansas to help decide the decision. The Republican Party opposed slavery which promoted the Democrats to conform with the Republicans. The political fight over slavery is what led to the civil conflict in Kansas.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Causes Of Nat Turner's Rebellion
    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Are The Causes Of Nat Turner's Rebellion

    Bleeding Kansas is the period of violence during the settling of Kansas. The Kansas-Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri compromise and instead used popular sovereignty. Free-state and proslavery settlers rushed into Kansas hoping to influence their opinions and ideas into the state's decision. Soon violence attacks started to occur. Including John Brown's raid on Harper’s Ferry.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics