Jonathan Safran Foer Against Meat Analysis
In the article “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer from the New York Time Magazine. Jonathan Foer main claim is that vegetarianism is the way to. He also talks about how our perspective of vegetarianism is different from how he see them. Foer argues about factory farming, global warming and how eating meat is not necessary.He establishes common ground with the audience by telling his personal experience with the audience.
First, Foer shares his opinion on factory farming in the article. Foer states “ I knew the gist: it is miserable for animals, the environment, farmers, public health, biodiversity, rural communities, global poverty and so on.” For me, as a person who eats meat, I know about factory farming. Do I agree with it? No, I don't, …show more content…
Foer states “While the cultural uses of meat can be replaced — my mother and I now eat Italian, my father grills veggie burgers, my grandmother invented her own “vegetarian chopped liver” — there is still the question of pleasure. A vegetarian diet can be rich and fully enjoyable, but I couldn’t honestly argue, as many vegetarians try to, that it is as rich as a diet that includes meat. “ Foer saying that vegetables are rich and full but I feel that there are some proteins that vegetables can not give us that meat give us. Foer also mention that “Meat and seafood are in no way necessary for my family — unlike some in the world, we have easy access to a wide variety of other foods. And we are healthier without it. So our choices aren’t constrained. I get that nowaday there is more option for vegetarian. But the price of some those substitutes is very expensive for the average person.
In the article “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer from the New York Time Magazine. Jonathan Foer main claim is that vegetarianism is the way to. He also talks about how our perspective of vegetarianism are different from how he see them. Foer argues about factory farming, global warming and how eating meat is not necessary.He establishes common ground with the audience by telling his personal experience with the
First, Foer shares his opinion on factory farming in the article. Foer states “ I knew the gist: it is miserable for animals, the environment, farmers, public health, biodiversity, rural communities, global poverty and so on.” For me, as a person who eats meat, I know about factory farming. Do I agree with it? No, I don't, …show more content…
Foer states “While the cultural uses of meat can be replaced — my mother and I now eat Italian, my father grills veggie burgers, my grandmother invented her own “vegetarian chopped liver” — there is still the question of pleasure. A vegetarian diet can be rich and fully enjoyable, but I couldn’t honestly argue, as many vegetarians try to, that it is as rich as a diet that includes meat. “ Foer saying that vegetables are rich and full but I feel that there are some proteins that vegetables can not give us that meat give us. Foer also mention that “Meat and seafood are in no way necessary for my family — unlike some in the world, we have easy access to a wide variety of other foods. And we are healthier without it. So our choices aren’t constrained. I get that nowaday there is more option for vegetarian. But the price of some those substitutes is very expensive for the average person.
In the article “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer from the New York Time Magazine. Jonathan Foer main claim is that vegetarianism is the way to. He also talks about how our perspective of vegetarianism are different from how he see them. Foer argues about factory farming, global warming and how eating meat is not necessary.He establishes common ground with the audience by telling his personal experience with the