Vegetarian Vs Vegetarian Essay
There has always been a battle between meat eaters and vegetarians. There is so much controversy regarding what the human race should or should not be putting in their bodies. Vegetarians often try to convert the meat eaters with their bias information and vice versa. The truth is, no one should be worried about what the other person is eating. Unless that person is responsible for providing the food, he or she should not worry about what the other person is consuming. What another decides to put in their body will in not affect some else’s body. Which is why everyone should learn the truth about both diets and decide which is better for them. Vegetarians are the group who seem to be more opinionated about the two vastly different
…show more content…
As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it. Vegetarians aren't the only ones who push their beliefs onto other people. Meat eaters do it too; although, they are not a persuasive and aggressive. The 1998 “Where’s The Beef?”article by Alan Herscovici takes a lighter approach to show audiences eating meat is not as bad as it is
As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it. Vegetarians aren't the only ones who push their beliefs onto other people. Meat eaters do it too; although, they are not a persuasive and aggressive. The 1998 “Where’s The Beef?”article by Alan Herscovici takes a lighter approach to show audiences eating meat is not as bad as it is