Preview

Julius Caesars Funeral

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesars Funeral
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar the people of Rome are looking for the new leader someone to replace the popular figure of Caesar. The citizens of Rome find their guidance in the two fellow Romans Mark Antony and Brutus who use the repetition of meaningful words “honor” and “ambition” to Manipulate the Plebeians to siding with both of them.

To begin, I would like to identify the speakers in the occasion of Caesar’s funeral which are Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony who are speaking to the audience of Plebeians or the people of Rome. Both Brutus and Mark Antony have a different purpose over the subject of Caesar’s tragic death. Brutus is portrayed as the antagonist in the script and his purpose and main idea over his words at Caesar’s funeral are that Caesar dying is actually a positive event rather than a tragic event. After Caesar’s death Mark Antony begins to assume the role of a new protagonist and his purpose defends Caesar and is a counter claim to Brutus’ speech.

Brutus had his speech made up of much moral credibility or in the rhetorical triangle known as Ethos. Also he had some logical things to state about the death of Caesar as he was very repetitive because he really wanted to get his point across to the people but some part of his speech were an obvious lie. Brutus’ speech is summarized best by line 22 with his exact words “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (Shakespeare 614) That is a good example of logos because he has some reason why he decided to take Action against Caesar. Brutus tells everyone he is a honorable man at least four times and pretty much tries to imply that he going to be the new Julius Caesar.

Mark Antony on the other had had a very ironic and emotional speech. His speech wasn’t what you would expect and he counter claimed Brutus as much as he could. For example Brutus stated that Caesar was very ambitious and always desired more and on line 78 Brutus states “The noble Brutus hath told

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus explained why it was only logical for Caesar to be stopped. Brutus portrayed Caesar’s death as a necessary evil. Brutus shows that he too loves Caesar, possibly more than the people, but Caesar has great potential to be a devastating tyrant. Antony uses the Logos to persuade the people as well. Antony uses the Logos method by showing the Romans Caesar’s will. The will persuades the citizens that Caesar cared very much for Rome and it’s citizens…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The leader of Rome is dead, and two men have completely different opinions as to what has happened to him. Brutus, his right hand man, says that he had to be killed due to his excessive ambition. While Antony states that he was brutally murdered by the people who called themselves his friends. But only one of the two stood out, they were so believable and convincing that it was hard to believe anyone other than him. And this speech was given by Antony. He gave an incredibly convincing speech, making the people of Rome completely look past the words of Brutus by sparking different emotions in them. But at the same time he was very careful and precise with his words which helped to protect him from the conspirators who murdered Caesar.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, both of them used ethos in their speeches. Brutus was only able to persuade the people by implying them to believe that Caesar was too ambitious just because he said so, whereas Antony had actual reasons to be believable. "Believe me for my honor and have respect to mine honor that you may believe... not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more"(pg126:III:ii). Brutus, for a short while, convinced the crowd that Caesar was too ambitious and if he did not kill him, everyone would be slaves. "The noble Brutus told you that Caesar was ambitious...He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill... yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man" (132,134: III: ii). Antony additionally mentions that he knows Caesar wept when the poor wept and…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Marc Antony’s speech he uses irony to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and Brutus. For example, when Marc Antony states, “But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man (pg. 123).” This conveyed irony because Anthony was saying one thing, yet meant something different. Antony stated that Brutus said Caesar was ambitious and everyone has to believe him because he is honorable, but really Antony meant the complete opposite. The reader and the citizens of Rome were able to realize that Marc Antony is saying these things about Brutus but he obviously doesn't really believe them himself, yet more…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brutus’s speech, he uses the rhetorical mode logos by saying “But ‘tis a common proof,/ That lowliness is young ambition’s ladder,/ Whereto the climberupward turns his face;/ But when he once attains the upmost round. (2.i.22-25)” This quote describes a common proof which to obtain power, a man might act humble, but when he actually is at the top, he betrays his supporters. This is an example of logos, because it is a maxim, where it is a common saying. It is a broad idea that is theoretical and abstract in language. This is very important, because here, Brutus is trying to convince and reassure himself, that killing his friend Caesar is right because it will benefit Rome. By saying the unstated truth about a two-faced man trying to gain authority, Brutus is reasoning out why the assassination is virtuous. Then, with this logos, he is planning out how to convince the others into murdering Caesar. The quote mentioned in Brutus’s speech appeals to the audience’s sense of logic and intellect. In Brutus’s monologue, he uses the rhetorical mode ethos by saying “I know no personal cause to spurn at him,/ But for the general. (2.i.11-12)” By informing the audience how he doesn’t have any personal emotions in him decision of killing Caesar, he is…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The tone of voice Brutus used in his speech was subjective and also persuasive. Brutus wanted the citizens to know that he did the right thing by killing Caesar. Brutus specifically states that he killed Caesar for the love of Rome. Brutus also states that Caesar was ambitious, which is used as a negative connotation in the speech. In the speech, Brutus tries to gain the citizens respect while explaining himself. Brutus displayed strong emotions, which is portrayed throughout the whole poem. Brutus wanted the citizens to agree that killing Caesar was a good thing and not a mistake. Also in the speech, Brutus used a lot of rhetorical questions which also helped establish a serious tone.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his speech, Antony used a lot of sarcasm. He told the citizens repeatedly that Brutus was an honorable man. “But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.86-87). While Antony seemed as though he was supportive of the conspirators and only mourning over Caesar’s body, he was…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus’s also said, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” which appeals to logos because his is making a logical statement that says Caesar’s death was for the best to Rome’s men freedom. At the end Brutus appeals pathos by saying, “who is there so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended” Brutus tells the Roman citizen that Caesar deserved what he got because he was too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the romans his slave.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the funeral orations in Julius Caesar it is evident that the perspective of Brutus on Caesar and his death are driven by his bias. Brutus’ avid patriotism results in his bias against Caesar, and consequently he puts the good of Rome before his loyalty to Caesar. This bias is represented effectively through the use of antithesis – “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”. Brutus believed that Caesar had a fatal flaw that put his beloved country in great jeopardy – ambition. This is represented through “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him…but as he was ambitious, I slew him” (Act3 Sc2). The use of parallelism unfortunately highlights this bias and exposes the flaws in Brutus’ reasoning as it contrasts three great attributes (love, valour, fortune) with only one supposed flaw. It is Brutus’ innate bias that leads him to believe that one flaw justifies the death of a great ruler.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Antony's speech, he talks about the bad things that Caesar has done and how Brutus was ambitious. It says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it." (III.ii.75-78) Which is a logo because it is a logic on how Caesar and Brutus are both ambitious. It also says, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill." (III.ii.84-87) Which means that Brutus is an straightforward man by reason of him brought captives home. Antony is speaking satisfactory about Brutus so the people would listen to Antony more effectively because of the nice things he is saying.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays