Just War Theory Research Paper

Just war theory explains the issues of justice in religious, political, and philosophical aspects. It is a notion that does refer not only on the aspect of getting the answer whether the war is just, but also it helps understand the answer why or the reason for war in the society. In the common phenomena, just war theory refers to war by itself has no negative impact and it can even just or have positive side at given situations. Most people do percept the issue of war as something bad and destructive (Morkevičius, P 18). They see way as something for grief, tears, developing sorrow, and taking lives. Just war theory looks not only on the bad side of the war, but on the positive or justifiable side. Basically, it helps get certain elements and goals that apply in the war.
According to the school of Salamanca, in March 2003, the United States attacked Iraq with the aim of stopping criminal activities that were running in the place. In the Dark Victory, there was an experience of cheap war within the American blood; that resulted to militarily and short decisive. Latter developments in the region indicated that the Dark Victory had positive results and established moral reasoning behind the attack that the American made. Clearly, the post-invasion Iraq according
Just cause as put across by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica justify why one should engage in a just war. Probability of success is another element for just war. So as to have a just war, the government should have seen the chances of getting or realizing its aims and prevent people from getting crushed by the opponents (Meisels, P 311). Unlike just war theory, natural law theory focuses on the ethics within any established war. Thomist form and Ambrose in this setting gives a definition on the key characteristics of morality that functions on the rational human nature of