Preview

Justice P.N.Bhagwati Committee Report

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2033 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice P.N.Bhagwati Committee Report
PREFACE
1. Takeover of companies is a well accepted and established strategy for corporate growth. International experience of takeovers and mergers and amalgamations has been varied. Nonetheless, one of its important lessons is that, its appeal as an instrument of corporate growth has usually been the result of an admixture of corporate ethos of a country, shareholding pattern of companies, existence of cross holdings in companies, cultural conditions and the regulatory environment.
2. In India, however, "the market" for takeovers has not yet become significantly active, though following economic reforms, there is now a discernible trend among promoters and established corporate groups towards consolidation of market share, and diversification into new areas, albeit in a limited way through acquisition of companies, but in a more pronounced manner through mergers and amalgamations. The latter course is outside the purview of SEBI and constitutes a subject matter of the Companies Act, 1956, and the courts of law, and there are well laid down procedures for valuation of shares and protection of the rights of investors. This Report and the SEBI Regulations for Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers do not deal with the subject of mergers and amalgamations.
3. In common parlance, a takeover bid is generally understood to imply the acquisition of shares carrying voting rights in a company in a direct or indirect manner with a view to gaining control over the management of the company. Generally speaking, there cannot be a change in the control of a company simpliciter, unaccompanied by acquisition of shares, though there have been cases before SEBI where management control has changed from one group of persons to another without any overt acquisition of substantial quantities of shares. It would therefore be correct to state that, takeover or gaining control over a company, as opposed to pure investment, is the most common leitmotif for substantial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Lubatkin, M. (1983), ``Mergers and the performance of the acquiring firm ' ', Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 218-25. Retrieved 2012-02-03…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to achieve economic goals, stay competitive and improve market position, firms have to advance with times by executing all kinds of strategies, one of which is acquisition. “An acquisition resembles more of an arm’s-length deal, with one firm purchasing the assets or shares of another, and with the acquired firm’s shareholders ceasing to be owners of that firm” (Sudarsanam, 2003). Serving as an important capital restructuring tool, acquisition offers firms a conceivable opportunity for development by taking over another firm economically and legally. This essay aims to demonstrate that initially firms can achieve growth by the means of the acquisition of another firm, but the long-term effect of acquisition appears to be a double-edged sword. Targeted financial indicators will be cited to support this view, and different factors, which include stock market value, shareholders’ income, firm management, external pressure, supply of resources and internal cooperation, will be discussed respectively.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does M&a Add Value?

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Bibliography: Goergen, M. and Renneboog,L., 2003. Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and crossborder takeover bids. European Corporate Governance Institute Finance Working Paper Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers, Journal of Business 59, 197-216 Servaes,H., 1991. Tobin’s Q and the gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance 46, 409-419 Kaplan,S and Weisbach,M.,1992. The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures, Journal of Finance 47, 107-138. Jensen, MC., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76, 323-329 Asquith, P; Bruner, R; and Mullins,F., 1987. Merger returns and the form of financing. Working Paper, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Business School Bruner, R., 2001. Does M&A Pay? A Survey of Evidence for the Decision-Maker. Batten Institute Working Paper, Darden Graduate School of Business Caves, R., 1989. Mergers, Takeovers and Economic Efficiency. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7 151-174 Meeks,G., 1977. Disappointing Marriage: A Study of Gains from Merger. Cambridge University Press Huang,Y and Walkling,R., 1989. Target Abnormal Returns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payment, Acquisition Form and Managerial Resistance, Journal of Financial Economics Yook, K.C., 2000. Larger Return to Cash Acquisitions: Signalling effect or Leverage effect? Working Paper, Johns Hopkins Gregory, A., 1997. An Examination of the Long Run Performance of UK Acquiring Firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 971-1002 Loughran,T and Vijh,A., 1997. Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 52 1765-1790 Lang,L; Stulz,R; and Walkling,R.,1989. Managerial Performance, Tobin’s Q and Gains from Successful Tender Offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24 137 - 154 Lewellen,W; Rosenfeld,A., 1985. Merger Decisions and Executive Stock Ownership in Acquiring Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 209-231 Berger,P.G and Ofek, E.,1995. Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value. Journal of Financial Economics 37 39-65 Bloomberg for accounting and financial data…

    • 2939 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    International Mergers

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The difference in merger practices between U.S. companies & companies in other countries is, mergers by form of hostile takeovers or any form of takeovers, is virtually nonexistent or uncommon (Gitman & Zutter 2012). The U.S.’s emphasis on shareholder value and relying on public capital markets for financing are also a few practices generally not shared by companies in continental Europe. Gitman & Zutter (2012) also state that the U.S. approach isn’t the norm in Japan and other Asian nations either. “Both European and Japanese companies have been active as acquirers of U.S. companies in recent years” (Gitman & Zutter 2012 pg.736). Historically the British have been the most active acquirers of U.S. firms, with…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In regards to acquisitions, it is important to distinguish between mergers and acquisitions. In a merger, two companies come together and create a new entity. In an acquisition, one company buys another one and manages it consistent with the acquirer’s needs. An acquisition that involves integration has greater staffing implications than one that involves separation (Rizvi, 2008). A combining of companies is a major change. Mergers and acquisitions represent the end of the gamut of options companies have in combining with each other. It is the mergers and acquisitions that are the combinations that have the greatest implications for size of investment, control, integration requirements, pains of separation, and people management issues (Doz and Hamel, 1998).…

    • 3253 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With newly issued M&A regulations and laws, foreign enterprises have more alternatives to acquire domestic corporations. They are starting to use mergers and acquisitions in the same way that they do elsewhere. However, many factors exist to discourage foreign firms from fully utilizing the advantages, such as poor standards of corporate governance, inadequate due diligence process and evaluation matters.…

    • 9316 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jensen, Michael C., 1988, Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 21-48…

    • 30125 Words
    • 121 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A takeover is characterized by the purchase of a smaller company by a much larger one. This combination of "unequals" can produce the same benefits as a merger, but it does not necessarily have to be a mutual decision.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A corporate merger is the creation of a single firm for two firms and combine their assets and liabilities. Merger tends to be used when the scale of the two enterprises are similar. It common occurs in high return industries. A corporate acquisition is the purchase of the target company by acquiring company. Acquisition tends to occur when the scale of the two companies are not similar, a lager company controls a smaller company, common in low growth industries (Teriesen). Acquiring company refers to the firm which shares are continuing exist, but it may be under a different name, and the target company is referred to the firm whose shares are substituted by the acquiring company.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiraju, H. (2003). Mergers, acquisitions and takeovers. New Delhi, India: New Age International. Rend cultural management. Human Relations, 50(2), 211–228.…

    • 3181 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mergers and Acquisitions

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The impact of mergers and acquisitions on business can be minor in some cases and larger in others. Companies merge with or acquire other companies for the purpose of making money. Sometimes these deals have a sensible reason for being made and other times they are dubious in nature, done for the sole purpose of raising the stock price.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘The only constant is change.’ This adage holds very well in the corporate sector. Yes, it is true that Indian market is in nascent stage and from decades, the rule followed in the business is to grow or die. Companies that do not grow tend to stagnate and destroy the shareholders fund. The need of the hour is either going for public or opt for some strategic M&A. Going public for a company is changing from private ownership to public ownership through initial public offering. M&A and IPO are considered as a vital part of a healthy economy and are the preferred ways of obtaining growth. The fund raising strategies are governed by market conditions. Generally, it is seen that in a bull market the number of IPOs increases while in a bear market, the number falls due to poor response of the investors using IPO. But M&A activities are governed by competition with the strategies of own-them-if-can’t-beat-them or dual-benefit. The terms merger and acquisition are completely different although they have common motive of “creating value for stakeholders”.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loughran, T. and Anand M. Vijh, 1997, Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance 52, 1765-1790…

    • 23354 Words
    • 94 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Merger Acquisition

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike previous merger waves, more companies have been successful with their acquisitions than not, although it is not clear whether this trend will continue. As shown in Figure 1.2, our analysis, in consultation with Towers Perrin, of shareholder performance in deals during the 1980s and 1990s was negative when compared to the market, whereas the performance of deals in the recent merger wave is thus far better than the market.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    view it is blight in our economy. Regardless of these views, they do represent a…

    • 3202 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays