In their interview they discussed the issue of the Kalam cosmological argument. Craig went on to discuss the argument is the steps that follow. First whatever begins to exist has a cause. Second the universe had a beginning and third there universe, therefore had a cause. They then discussed several models that have been proposed trying to explain away the universe being finite. Craig ended the argument by saying “I think it’s indisputable that there has never been a time in history when the hard evidence of science was more confirmatory of belief in God than today.” Lee Strobel went on to interview several other people including Robin Collins about the evidence of physics, Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards about astronomy, Michael Behe about the evidence of biochemistry, and J.P. Moreland about the consciousness of the mind and what evidence it has for a designer. I simply do not have time to read the rest of the book or summarize the last chapters which I read one of which was completely over my head in physics theory that I did not fully …show more content…
It was very is well written and very easy to read. I especially liked the layout of the book because it had very clear headings and subheadings. This book has given me greater understanding of why science points to a personal God who created the universe by design. I wish I would have known about this book in high school going through biology it would have been interesting to bring up the topics in class that Lee Strobel and Jonathan Wells discussed. I would definitely recommend this book to someone else who has had a good background in science, but I probably would not recommend it to a person who knows very little about science because it would not be very meaningful to them. I even got lost as I said when they started discussing quantum physics. Overall though, I learned a lot of interesting knowledge and will probably refer back to this book in the