Preview

Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1000 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism Essay
In this paper, I will explain the different points of view of Kantianism, Utilitarianism, Contractarianism and their corresponding philosophers, as well as my own opinion about the presented case of the adulterous affair. First, I will begin by explaining how Kant would view this situation and what decisions he would make. In Kantianism, it is imperative to always say the truth and do that which is right. Regardless of the situation that one may find him or herself in, he or she must always say the truth in order to be moral. Kant assumes that by saying the truth, the person wants the good. Kant would find the affair to be completely immoral. Tom has lied to Carol with a lie of omission by cheating on her with Francine for more than a year because he has done something behind her back that they both know they should not do. Kant would also say that in this case, Tom should tell Carol about his affair. Even though Tom …show more content…

Hobbes practices contractarianism. Contractarianism is considered to be moral when one follows the rules that have been made in previous agreements by two or more parties. According to the scenario, I can deduct that Tom and Carol although they are married; they have also agreed to be exclusive. Tom has now broken an agreement by having an affair. Hobbes would say that Tom has been immoral by having an affair with Francine. So, according to Hobbes, should Tom tell his wife Carol about the affair? Well, if they made an agreement to be truthful to each other, then Tom should tell his wife the truth so that he does not continue to be immoral by breaking another rule. Another option that Tom has would be to make another agreement with his wife in order to make the situation more equal. They can agree to let her have an affair as well but, regardless he would have to tell her the truth because as I mentioned before he would be breaking another agreement if he doesn’t tell

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The case of “The Schiavos” is focused primarily on one member of the family, which is Terri Schiavo. Terri had been in a coma for 13 years. Although, “no one is completely sure what happened but the best guess is she suffered a heart attack” (Pierce, 64) presumably caused by her bulimia. Due to the severity of her heart attack, it left Terri with severe brain damaged which in turn left her in a persistent vegetative state which leaves a person showing no awareness of one’s environment. Terri’s husband, Michael Schiavo, contended that there was no hope for Terri to recover and that he felt it was his wife's wish that she not be kept alive through life support. Michael Schiavo wanted her feeding tube removed, after which Terri would slowly die. The parents of Terri however, felt that Terri “should be fed indefinitely” (Pierce, 64). Thus, creating a moral battle between her parents, and her husband as to whether or not Terri Schiavo should continue to live in her vegetative state.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue Ethics Case Study

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Therefore; either one could be using the other for sex, short term lust, and just pure companionship, but with no actual want for involvement. Both peoples maxims are geared toward the wrong reasons, sex for just the hell of it, not wanting a passion filled and strong connection sex. Being the case a Kantian theorist would say this is wrong. Since both, betrayal and the usage of another person is happening this action is not just; therefore, I am obligated to tell Suzie. I do not want to lead on deceit, because I want to have morally right actions, unlike Billy. Another approach would be treating Billy special if I didn’t tell Suzie, while it is known that I find them both equally good friends. There is no reason to treat Billy more special, in his case there are no exceptions. A Kantian would say to not treat one friend more special over the other, due to the fact that is not fair to the friend that is being deceived. Therefore, resulting in a Kantian declaring his actions immoral and…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical teachings and values of utilitarianism and Christian ethics are similar in some aspects, yet however are diverse in others. Utilitarianism is a generally teleological ethical system, where the outcome is said to justify the act. The act is considered ‘good’ if it brings about the greatest good for the greatest number. Christian Ethics, however, can be quite different. Many aspects of its ethics are deontological, for example, the Decalogue and Natural Law. There are other differences and indeed some similarities which will be considered throughout this essay.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What are the key differences between utilitarianism, deontology, natural law ethics, and virtue theory?…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory begins from the starting point of the good will. In assessing the moral worth on an action we must focus not on the consequences of results of the action, but on the agent’s will ( the motivation of conducting an action is really important).…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when distinguishing between one’s self interested inclinations and moral duty. Humans were “…finite beings with our individual needs…yet we [were] also rational beings, and for Kant that include[d]…the recognition of moral obligations” (Stevenson and Haberman p.155). The contrast and ever-apparent strain between these opposing sides of human nature fuel Kant’s diagnosis of human’s frailty. In Kant’s conception of human reason and action, he distinguished between categorical and hypothetical imperatives which displayed the human struggles regarding what decisions were morally right. Self interested desires, “…which involve[ed] only the selection of means to satisfy one’s own desire” (p.151) could be defined as a hypothetical imperative. However, categorical imperative claims “…that morality is fundamentally a function of [one’s] reason, not just [one’s] feelings” (p.151). Knowing what was morally right and doing what was morally right was the depravity of human nature, the choice of choosing one’s own happiness over their obligations to those who surround them. The desire for instant gratification from any action hinders human’s consideration of longer-term self-interest. The difficulty arises when the one must decide to postpone immediate satisfaction in the interest of future goals; a “…balance to strike between living for the moment and planning for the future….” (p.155) must be reached. Human’s struggles with moral decisions and personal gain exemplify their…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay we will discuss what Kant’s and a utilitarian’s view on insider trading would be. As we have discussed in previous essays, Kant believed that moral rules could be known through reason and not just by observation (Shaw and Barry 69). For me this is the basis of all decisions that we make and why I would support Kant’s point of view on insider trading. Utilitarianism concentrates on producing the greatest amount of happiness and using it as a standard to determine if an action is right or wrong (Shaw and Barry 62). Utilitarianism requires too much concentration on individual aspects of what the greatest happiness is and basing moral standards around them.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism and Kant’s respective have different ways for demonstrating whether an act we do is right or wrong. Corresponding to Kant, we should look at our maxims, intentions, of a particular action. Kantians believe “If we are rational, we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another” (Shafer-Landau, Russ 194). In other words, humans are rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for self-interest. On the other hand, Utilitarian’s believe that we should do actions that produce the greatest amount of happiness. However, this could associate using people as mere means and lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While searching for the answer to whether or not I did the right thing by lying about my father, I traced my thought process during that time. Although justice for my brother was at the hindsight of my mind, consequences for me, my brother, and extended and nuclear family were an even more important consideration for me. Act-utilitarianism justifies what is right or wrong by the consequences of a situation; this explains why it is the main principle to use for my scenario. This traditional form of utilitarianism focuses on whether an act is morally permissible or required based on the predicted or actual consequences. Because my actual consequences were very similar to my predicted consequences, it cancels out the necessity to use this as a justification for my action of lying. According to…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism and Deontology support the legalization of marijuana, it produces a greater good for the economy, health, and positive effect on people’s happiness. The law of duty would be moral, and legalizing marijuana stimulates jobs, reduces crime rates, helps medically, and economically produces money. As a Utilitarian, they believe that the best action is the one the maximizes utility, and in this argument marijuana is a utility that could benefit for the greater good of human beings. In Deontology, they belief on the action on themselves are right or wrong. From an ethical stand point their beliefs are different, since deontology looks as actions right and wrong, while utilitarianism sees the action promoting the greatest happiness. They share the same concept that in the end the right action, tends to promote in the end the sentient welfare or happiness. Some ethical moral reasons include, Health, Criminal Justice, and Economic Opportunity.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays