Preview

Kaplan and Porter Correlation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kaplan and Porter Correlation
Strategic Resource Management

The correlation’s between Kaplan and Norton’s “Mastering the Management System” and Porters “Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy” are significant. Managers need to have a complete understanding of their company’s surroundings in order to change their strategy. These two articles combined could be considered a 2-step process in itself. Step one, analyzing the environment of an industry utilizing Porters Five Forces model and step two, following the five stages laid out by Kaplan and Norton. Taking advantage of both models will give executives a complete 360 degree view of their business while developing, implementing, and measuring their new strategy.

Porters five forces tool was designed to develop a view of a company’s external environment. The external environment is not only inclusive of the industry and its competitors, but an overall current state of affairs from an economic point of view. When management decides to begin investigating the idea of developing a new strategy, Porters five forces is a tool that is accepted as a starting point in the investigation. As a company should know its operating costs and profits, the five forces give an answer as to why the industry of said company are what they are (Porter, “The Five Forces That Shape Strategy” pg. 88). The five forces are composed of four forces that when combined produce a fifth. While having an understanding of each force is required, managers must not make common mistakes such as diving into one force to deeply or concentrating on all forces when only focus on the important ones are needed (Porter, “The Five Forces That Shape Strategy” pg. 88).

While Porter’s five forces is a starting point, his model was not designed to guide managers through the execution of implementing and measuring a new strategy. This is where Kaplan and Norton’s five stages from “Mastering the Management System” (MMS) can be taken advantage of. MMS is a tool to dive in to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rize Documentary

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In doing strategic analysis, it is sometimes useful to examine the industry in terms of Porter’s five forces (however, some industry characteristics critical to formulating strategy might not be apparent from this framework).…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Key Points:  After 30 years, the Five Forces Analysis is still one of the most effective ways to assess industry structure and performance when done correctly.  As the tool’s name states, there are five forces that together illuminate industry structure: Bargaining Power of Buyers, Bargaining Power of Suppliers, Barriers to Entry, Threat of Substitute Product or Services, and Rivalry Among Existing Competitors.  A recent update to the model is the addition of Complements, goods or services that impact the demand of the products/services provided by the industry under analysis. It is considered more of a factor than a force per the model creator. Main Thoughts: Where the PESTEL analysis is a general or macro environmental analysis tool, the Five Forces model is a means to assess the micro or industry environment. Developed by strategy professor Michael Porter of Harvard Business School in the early 1970s, the Five Forces model has become one of the most widely known strategy analysis tools in use today. The tool helps users identify—through detailed examination of each force—what the underlying drivers of industry behavior and performance are.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Michael E Porter (2008). THE FIVE COMPETITIVE FORCES THAT SHAPE STRATEGY. Harvard Business Review: Special HBS Centennial Issue, 86(1), 78-93. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 1406854351).…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    10. Applying the five forces model to business-level strategy allows managers to assess the benefits and risks…

    • 16463 Words
    • 79 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Onesteel

    • 4534 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Porter, M 2008, ‘The five competitive forces that shape strategy’, Harvard Business Review, January, 2008.…

    • 4534 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coffee and Broadway Cafe

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model is a useful tool to aid organizations facing the challenging decision of entering a new industry or industry segment. The Five Forces Model helps determine the relative attractiveness of an industry and includes:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Case Study

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Porter, Michael E. ‘The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy’. Harvard Business Review. January 2008. Pg. 78-93…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Qantas Case Study

    • 5987 Words
    • 24 Pages

    References: Porter, M (2000), ‘The five competitive forces that shape strategy’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 78-93.…

    • 5987 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Porter, M (2008) the Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review, January. 2008…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Given the demands of today's competitive and dynamic environment, it is quite challenging to understand strategic issues facing organizations and develop the capability for long term organizational success. This report aims to present a critically analysis of three frameworks across organizations: Porter's Five Forces, Value Chain and Balanced Scorecard. Such critical evaluation includes identifying the benefits and limitations of three frameworks and considering some implementation issues within organizations.…

    • 4426 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Porter

    • 7041 Words
    • 28 Pages

    not comparable with the ‘Old Economy’, which is the basis of the Five Forces model.…

    • 7041 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Macro Environmental Analysis

    • 2764 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Porter, M. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78-93.…

    • 2764 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    TATA INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper, economics in managerial decision making will be examined. It describes the decision making processes of management in diverse market structures. The main objective of an organization is to maximize profits in each type of market structure. Quasar Computers has done extensive research for the development of optical notebook. In 2003, Quasar launched the first all-optical notebook computer trademarked as 'Neutron '. Neutron uses energy saving optical technology, which established it as the market forerunner (Tata Interactive Systems, 2014.). Below are examples of pricing and other decisions which were taken for this product in various market structures.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    koko

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With Porter’s five forces, we will be able to understand how we should improve the company and understand competitors better. Also, it will help us understand the market and how we should position our company before entering the market…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The application of systemic tools to analyze an organizations external environment and implement an effective strategy has enabled companies to better position themselves in their industry. The analysis of current conditions is a necessary precursor to the system that will manage the changes required to achieve the company vision and live up to its mission and values. The basic tools for this approach are Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy and Robert Kaplan and David Norton’s Strategic Management System. Each approach addresses a different stage of the strategic lifecycle, but on a fundamental level, remain equally necessary for success. It can be argued that Kaplan and Norton’s strategic Management System cannot be properly implemented without consideration of Porter’s Five Forces and the information that this analysis tool brings to bare.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays