However, Lenin’s interpretation of some of his ideals, such as “flexible revolution.”Lenin failed to interpret that Marx meant an open door for revolution if the government corrupts, rather Lenin used the word to his own political advantage, most likely to lessen his people’s power and grow his own. Especially in his later years as leader of the Soviet Union, Lenin strayed from Marxist socialistic ideals and used much of his own ideology to run his country. “The [Russian] Revolution was successful in terms of its transfer of power from the provisional government to the vanguard Bolshevik party.”(Art of Polemics) That is to say, the Russian revolution did not produce the socialist society envisioned by Karl Marx. Instead, it was successful in giving …show more content…
For instance, the “Abolition of property in land and application of all rent of land to public purposes.” that Marx presents in the Communist manifesto, is one thing that Lenin implemented into his new Communistic society. He also implemented the monopolization of all businesses to the government and the establishment of a national monopolized bank. Marx wanted the centralization of all means of transportation and production, and Lenin did exactly that by ratifying the Supreme Council for National Economy, which would oversee the transfer of such luxuries from private to government hands. Marx recognized that wealth was spread too thinly across the proletariat and the majority of wealth resided with the bourgeois. Therefore, Lenin not only introduced universal labor duty, but also established the Red Army to enforce the taking of wealth from the wealthy and giving it to the government to redistributed to society equally. From his letters, it is clear Lenin understood many of the principles of Marxist Communism, even using Marx’s “exploitation” diction to describe the bourgeois’ role in society. However, what is beautifully worded in principle is not always efficient in