Preview

Khafre and Seated Scribe

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Khafre and Seated Scribe
Ricardo Garza
Ms. Payne
Art History
14 September 2013
Comparison
The two pieces, “Khafre” and “Seated Scribe”, are two art pieces that have originated from the ancient Egyptian time period. These two pieces are very similar and different in many ways. With this in mind, we learn that art work, depending on the time period, may have similar meanings but also different messages and that same time. The piece “Khafre” has many differences compared to “Seated Scribe”. One of these differences is simple; Khafre, the Pharaoh that is being depicted in the piece, “Khafre” has the body build, such as muscles, that would give the viewer the idea that he is a leader. While on the other hand, the piece “Seated Scribe” shows a man sitting down with little to no body strength and shows the viewer that he had a good life that was free of physical labor. Another difference between the two pieces is that the lives of the two are completely different. While the Pharaoh shows a life of seriousness, strength, and power; the “Seated Scribe” shows the viewer a life of wisdom, alertness, eagerness, labor free, and attentiveness. Another major difference between the two pieces is that on the “Khafre” piece, the Pharaoh’s throne has plants, papyrus and lotus plants, that represent his ruling and power over the upper and lower regions of Egypt. With this in mind the viewer of “Seated Scribe” notices that the scribe might have been in one of those two regions of Egypt and although he shows more of a labor free life, he might still be under the law of the Pharaoh, Khafre; proving the fact that Khafre has more obvious power over the normal human being, yet alone a scribe. One last difference is in the wealth difference of the two people. While the Pharaoh sits on a throne with a backing on it, the scribe sits on the hard ground but still has perfect posture. With these differences the viewer can begin to have a better understanding of the meaning and symbolism behind the two pieces.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By comparing the two sculptures of Khafre, image 3-11 ca. 2520-2494 BCE (1), with the statue of Doryphoros (Spear Bearer), image 5-40 ca. 450-440 BCE (2) you get a true sense of the evolution of art, from Pharaonic Egypt to Classical Athenian Greece two millennia later. This was not just a revolution in art but also philosophy, which transported itself into not only the types sculptures created but also the style used by their creators.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling for 11 years, Seti I, whose throne name was Menmaatre Seti, or “Established is the Justice of Re,” was a somewhat obscure yet important pharaoh of Egypt's 19th Dynasty. He was a great builder, with the Hypostyle Hall at Karnak and the Temple at Abydos being some of his greatest feats in this field. In contrast, he was a fierce warrior, leading many campaigns into Syria and Lybia, and most notably capturing the strategic Syrian city of Kadesh. But most importantly to ancient Egypt as we know it, he was known as the “Repeater of Births” for his great restoration of the country. Ancient Egypt may not have thrived without Seti I ruling for 11 years.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The comparison between the Head of Senusret III and Khafre is that they both ruled Egypt. Both sculptures where found in temple where their tombs were located. Also, their sculptures were use as The differences between the Head of Senusret III and Khafre is that they were made in different time periods. The first phot which is the Head of Senusret III was made during the Middle Kingdom and the photo, Khafre was made in the Old Kingdom. Even though Senusret III and Khafre were both pharaohs of Egypt, both on them ruled different years. Khafre ruled in approximately from 2529-2494 BCE and Senusret III ruled from 1836-1818 BCE. Based on looking at the photos can see a lot of differences between the two sculptures. Senusret III is much smaller in size than Khafre. Senusret…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hatshepsut Research Paper

    • 4076 Words
    • 17 Pages

    While the concept of a female ruler as a Queen Regent or Co- regent was not foreign to New Kingdom practices there was no provision for a female pharaoh in Egyptian tradition. Hatshepsut’s portrayal as male was unprecedented. ‘After Hatshepsut regency for about seven years the political situation apparently changed and a bomb shell exploded’ . Hatshepsut dressed herself in the clothes of a man, put on the false beard that pharaohs traditionally wore and proclaimed her self ‘king of Egypt’. Hatshepsut portrayed her self as male not only in her physical appearance. But also in her Royal title, inscriptions and in monuments.…

    • 4076 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The King statue is a larger than life representation that looks different from the back and the front. The base of the statue has four panels, each with a different scene depicted on them. This makes the viewer motivated to walk around to each side and look at the panels. It is difficult to make a personal connection to this work because it is a lot higher than the viewer’s line of sight. It makes the viewer feel underneath the statue and not at eye level. However, the statue’s lifelike quality and naturalistic appeal provide a more personal experience.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the reign of the 18th Dynasty, Akhenaton had made his kingdom very wealthy and powerful, but at the same time he also changed art in his time period which became known as the Amarna Period. Art in the Amarna period was very different from the stiff and unemotional art from the earlier Egyptian dynasties. Akhenaton was very influential on the art; it seemed that he wanted the art to convey real life taking place. Even though portrayal of Akhenaton himself seems exaggerated it seems more life-like then the earlier art, all Pharaohs seemed to look exactly the same with the same body and the same stance. Amarna art shows Akhenaton with a very elongated face, full lips, cat-like eyes and a pudgy stomach. All of…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aldred C, Akhenaten: Pharaoh of Egypt – a new study, Thames and Hudson, Lengarich (Germany), 1968…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 101 Study Guide

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [pic]The pharaoh’s role was not to legislate and devise new rules, but to govern by traditional principles.[pic]…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Egypt's New Kingdom, the role of queens during the reign of Amenhotep 3 and Akhenaten significantly transformed from the confinements of their traditional roles as passive heirs to the throne who provided a divine consort for the king. This is evident through Queen Tiye and Queen Ahmose-Nefertiti through the depictions and evidence displaying the prominent roles in political and religious policies Queens began to assume.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To the average “peasant” the Pharaoh was a demigod, but to the various officers and political figures surrounding him he was no more than a man with power, and not even supreme power. This is immediately evident in the first narrative with the high priest of Amun, who from the very beginning (since Akhenaten was young) disdained the prince due to his physical appearance. As Akhenaten grew older and continued to stray from the required religious traditions the high priest had multiple meetings with Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye to chastise the prince’s upbringing, which displays the high priest’s view of the Pharaoh: not as an infallible demigod, but as merely a man who makes mistakes when raising his son. Likewise, this displays a “weakness” in the power of the Pharaoh; though he is king, he is still subject to the rule of Amun and the high priests. The various individuals Meriamun interviews themselves represent the different positions surrounding the Pharaoh: chief of police, general of the army, minister of the state, sculptor/architect, high priest (Amun and the One God), etc. Every narration includes brief descriptions of how they performed their duties, and in this manner Mahfouz gives the reader an idea of the day to day functions of the Egyptian…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akhenaten Art Style

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In spite of the ceremonial scenes of the Pharaoh praising Aten continues to be a crucial point of the period, there was a growing stress on the intimate displays of Akhenaten and Nefertiti playing with their daughters underneath the light of their god. Throughout initial years there has been a propensity for the artists to make the royal family members look just as disfigured as the Pharaoh. Their necks were elongated and narrow,they had sloped noses and foreheads, protruding chins, broad ears and lips,stem-like arms and calves and extensive thighs,stomachs, and hips as seen in the stele Akhenaten and his family. “ A brief moment in the lives of five beings as they are caught in the act of mutual affection.” (Aldred)…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brooklyn Museum Visit

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the first assignment in Dr. Crawford’s Art 100 class, the students have to visit the Brooklyn Museum’s Egypt Exhibit. From which we pick a artifact we thought was interesting and write a paper about the artifact; the artifact that I have chose is the Kneeling Statue of Senemut. The reason I found this artifact interesting, is because Senemut isn’t a person from royalty and what’s even more interesting, he was a official to a pharaoh whom was female.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Egypt Change

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sarah Barnard HIST1108 Professor Murphy October 2014 CREATIVE TITLE Life was going decently well in Egypt under the rule of Amenhotep III, however not all good things last forever, and when he passed away, his oldest living son, Amenhotep IV, took the throne. His subjects were not prepared for what was to occur in the coming years under the new ruler. The beginning of Amenhotep IV’s reign didn’t hold too many changes but as the years progressed, one by one, transformations to the Egyptian way of life (religion especially) began to take place. These changes that were initiated were not only in religion, but in art, writing, politics, architecture, and all were based on his new philosophy.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Standing at around four feet eight inches, the sculpture of Menkaure and His Queen is estimated to have been created between 2548 to 2530 BC. The figures depicted in the sculpture are Pharaoh Menkaure and, who is thought to be Queen Khamerernebty II. The sculpture was carved out of slate and has also been known as Menkaure and Khamerernebty. The artist of the sculpture is unknown. Menkaure and His Queen shows the two-people standing side by side and the queen has an arm wrapped around the pharaoh. This piece gives a look at Egyptian culture during this time and preserves the image of Pharaoh Menkaure and Queen Khamerernebty.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    museum paper

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When I visited the Brooklyn Museum, I got to see many different works of art. While looking around on the 3rd floor, there was one specific piece that caught my attention, “King Senwosret III”. King Senwosret III was a 12th Dynasty King that ruled from c. 1836-1818 BCE. King Senwosret III was considered to be one of the most powerful rulers during the middle kingdom. This small, black granite sculpture that caught my eye is of him. It was created during the time of the middle kingdom. It is not known for sure, but this artwork is believed to be from Hierakonpolis, Egypt. During this time period, sculptures of kings depicted a more real look. The Middle Kingdom lasted from c. 1975-1640 BCE. Art was very important to the Egyptian culture. The sculpture of King Senwosret III has certain characteristics that make it obvious to see that it is an Egyptian work.…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics