Preview

KONG SIEW KEN V LAW AH LAN & ANOR [2002] 5 MLJ 296

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
KONG SIEW KEN V LAW AH LAN & ANOR [2002] 5 MLJ 296
The second defendant was adjudged a bankrupt in 1998. After becoming a bankrupt, he continued to represent himself in the company correspondence as chairman or director and took part in the management of the company and was even appointed general manager.
The second defendant's shares in the company was transferred to one Ho Kum Chen at 10 sen per share before being subsequently transferred to the second defendant's wife, namely, the first defendant.
The plaintiff prayed to the court for an injunction to restrain the second defendant from continuing to take part in the management of the company and that the transfer to Ho Kum Chen, and subsequently to the first defendant was void because it did not comply with art 34A of the company's articles of association.
Held: Allowing the application for injunction.
Section 125(1) of the Companies Act 1965 prohibited an undischarged bankrupt from acting as director of a company or taking part directly or indirectly in the management of a company except with leave of court. There was therefore a basis for granting the application for injunction unless the second defendant was now no longer a bankrupt.

Morris -v- Kanssen; HL 1946
The House considered the effect of provisions relating to the acts of directors in the 1929 Act. Lord Simonds said: “There is, as it appears to me, a vital distinction between (a) an appointment in which there is a defect or, in other words, a defective appointment, and (b) no appointment at all. In the first case it is implied that some act is done which purports to be an appointment but is by reason of some defect inadequate for the purpose; in the second case there is not a defect, there is no act at all. The section does not say that the acts of a person acting as director shall be valid notwithstanding that it is afterwards discovered that he was not appointed a director. Even if it did, it might well be contended that at least a purported appointment was postulated. But it does not do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plaintiff is Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., an investment firm. The defendant is Karen Howsam, a former investment client of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. who between 1986 and 1994 bought interests in four limited partnerships.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the world's population grew, so did political and economic instability, as well as major international conflicts. Tensions between countries and cultures tightened, and eventually and inevitably, one of them attacked. This terrorist act brought with it the panic and chaos fuelled haze that was post-911 Australia, and similar to many situations in the past, the fear and vulnerability associated with the community allowed the government quite a substantial amount of political power. This atmosphere of fear and ignorance lead to several incomplete and somewhat extreme pieces of Anti terrorist legislation to be passed by the Howard government, in order to ensure the safety of all Australians, or so they said. Dr Mohammed Haneef a doctor working in Queensland on a skilled migrant visa, soon found himself a victim of these laws. When two Indian men attempted to bomb an airport in Glasgow, UK, Mohammed Haneef became a suspect in the eyes of the Australian Federal Police, and was arrested shortly. Several blunders and misinterpretations by the AFP lead to the wrongful detention and charging of Dr Haneef, a man who spent a total of 12 days in detention without being charged and had his visa unfairly revoked during his trial. Haneef was eventually released and all charges were dropped against him, when the Public Prosecutor determined that there was no legitimate trial against him. However, the course of events that Dr Haneef experienced brought to light the glaring dilemmas associated with Australia's radical Anti Terrorist laws and corresponding government agencies.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OUTCOME: The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding no abuse of discretion in the reduction of the duration of a covenant not to compete against appellee, former employee, where hardship to appellee by reinstatement of the expired injunction was a more onerous burden than was required to protect the business of appellant.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The results from the surveys conducted concluded that the food at Lucky Cheng’s rated a 9 and in the category of décor and service a 15; scores could range from 0-30. Keeping in mind the results came directly from consumers…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case Study 2

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: On December 16, 2005, James M. Eaton, Jr., and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated in Jefferson County ("the property") to Waldrop and Marguerite, jointly with a right of survivorship, and that Waldrop had subsequently fraudulently induced Marguerite to transfer her interest in the property to Waldrop. James and Marguerite requested that the court set aside the deed executed by James transferring the property to Marguerite and Waldrop and requested "other, further or different relief as may be just and proper"; they also demanded a trial by jury. Waldrop answered the complaint on January 26, 2006. Marguerite subsequently died, and James, as the executor of her estate, was substituted as a plaintiff.…

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As this was a case brought up by the state of Nevada, there were criminal charges that were filed against the defendant Taukitoku, those being three counts of murder with the use of a firearm as well as four counts of assault with a deadly weapon. The murder with the use of a firearm charges against Taukitoku were brought up for the killings of Charles Kelly, Derek Jensen, and Nathaniel Viljoen with a .380 Taurus semi-automatic handgun. The four counts of assault with a deadly weapon were for the killings of the three men and pointing the gun at Annetria Scott, another woman who was attending the party. Since Taukitoku’s trial took place in a criminal court, jury unanimity was required to uphold his guilt. Similarly, the state was required to prove that the evidence of Taukitoku’s crimes were beyond a reasonable doubt, i.e., a certainty of 98%, to be convicted.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    · Assess the past, present, and future impact that victim rights laws have on court proceedings.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegligence Case Study

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Saturday January 21, 2012, suffered a personal injury which accrued a cause of action. Plaintiff did not file any suit with the court until January 14, 2014. (Pl.’s Original Pet., 1). After filing, Defendant Vista Views Property informed in writing of a defect of parties. (Def.’s Original Answer, 1). It was at this time plaintiff realized a defect of parties. Plaintiff filed an amended petition on February 18, 2014 which changed the defendants to Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., This amended petition also nonsuited previous defendants. (Pl’s 1st Am. Pet., 1, February 18, 2014). It was at this time Defendants responded with original answer. (Def.’s Original Answer March 14, 2014). On March 27, 2014 Pierce Connery, president of Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., stated that he received no notice of lawsuit until mid-February. He further stated that the nature of his job and in the normal course of employment would ensure that he received notice immediately after service…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A male defendant case mentioned by Phillips (2003:510) is that Dong-lu Chen, who was a Chinese immigrant to New York, battered his wife to death some weeks after discovering she was having an affair. At his trial in 1988, an expert claimed that violence against women for adultery was commonplace in the traditional Chinese culture due to the fact that the adulterous act of a woman would be seen as an enormous statin on her husband and even affect his remarriage. Therefore, the judge made their judgments that Chen was ‘driven to violence by traditional Chinese values about adultery and loss of manhood’, and convicted him of second-degree manslaughter. Issues related to the culture backgrounds of the defendants may affect the level of punishment…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Unit 03 Aqa

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * Miller (1954): any hurt or injury calculating to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Property Law

    • 63351 Words
    • 254 Pages

    Table of Contents d 5 Torrens Title Lan Introduction 5 Principle of Indefeasibility 5 Key Provisions (RP Act) 5 Deferred v immediate indefeasibility 6 Frazer v Walker 1967 6 Breskvar v Wall (1971) 7 What will attract indefeasibility? 8 Leases: 9 Mercantile Credits Ltd v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1976) 9 Karacominakis v Big Country Developments (2000) 11 Mortgages: 11 Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (2007) 11 Volunteers 12 Bogdanovic v Koteff (1988) 12 Rasmussen v Rasmussen [1995] 13 Exceptions to Indefeasibility 14 Fraud Exception: 15 Loke Yew v Port Swettenham Rubber Co Ltd [1913] 15 Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] 16 Schultz v Corwill Properties (1969) 16 Russo v Bendigo Bank Ltd (1993) 17 The In Personam Exception 18 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 18 Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd v Gosper (1991) 20 Vassos v State Bank of South Australia (1993) 20 Special equity cases: 21 Personal equity and breach of trust: 22 Personal Equities and Mistake 23 OTHER EXCEPTIONS; OVERRIDING STATUTES 23 The Register, equitable interests and caveats 26 The Register 26 Bursill Enterprises Pty Ltd v Berger Bros Trading Co Pty Ltd 26 White v Betalli [2007] NSWCA 243 27 Equitable interests and unregistered instruments 27 Barry v Heider (1914) 19…

    • 63351 Words
    • 254 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From a moral standpoint it would be misguided to equate the failings of a minor with those of an adult.”-Justice Anthony Kennedy. In 1993, Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death when he was only 17. A series of appeals to state and federal courts were submitted but each appeal was rejected. Then, in 2002, The Missouri Supreme Court stayed Simmon’s execution while the U.S Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia, where the U.S. Supreme court ruled that executing the mentally ill violated Eight and 14th Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment because majority of Americans found it cruel and unusual, the Missouri Supreme Court started to reconsider Simmon’s case. Using the reasoning from this case, the Missouri court decided…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    business law

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nancy Johnston, appellant, brought suit against her employer, Del mar Distributing Co., Inc., appellee, alleging that her employment had been wrongfully terminated. Del Mar filed a motion for summary judgment in the trial court alleging that appellant’s pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motion, the trial agreed with Del Mar and granted its motion for summary judgment.…

    • 343 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The applicant, through a notice of motion, sought leave and an order to stay winding up proceedings under s. 243 of Companies Act 1965 (CA) when there was no appeal pending in the court of appeal and the winding up order was given as early as 23 June 1997. The application was based on the following grounds: (i) the respondent had fully satisfied the debts owing to the petitioner; (ii) there were no other debts owing by the respondent to other creditors; (iii) there was nothing for the liquidator to investigate with regard to the conduct of the respondent, its directors and/or its officer. The issues that arose were (a) whether a stay under s. 243 could be given as of right and (b) whether a stay could be given when there was no pending appeal or cogent reasons for granting the stay.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would you do if you were accused of something you did not actually do? How would you feel if you had to serve a life sentence in prison for a crime you didn’t commit? Adnan Syed is an inmate at the Maryland Correctional Facility, serving a life sentence for killing his former girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. While there is some evidence saying Adnan is guilty of the murder of Hae Min Lee, there is even more evidence saying he didn’t. Adnan Syed is innocent and had nothing to do with the murder of Hae Min Lee because Adnan and Hae were still friends when she was murdered and Adnan had an alibi at the time that Hae was supposed to be murdered at.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics