Labour In The Unorganised Sector Issues And Concerns 
XLRI, Jamshedpur
Pranabesh Ray
LABOUR IN THE UNORGANISED SECTOR: ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Sarath Davala
Problems of Definition
The bulk of the Indian labour force is employed in what is loosely referred to as unorganised sector. Most of them are neither organised nor hive any access to social security. Their employment is unprotected, their wages are extremely low, and a large section of them live under conditions below the poverty line. The developmental efforts by the state have done little to improve their living coalitions. This is a matter of concern not only for the trade unions but also for every rational person in this country.
Defining the term 'unorganised sector' is a difficult task indeed. Apart from the conceptual difficulties, the definition also depends on who is defining it and for what purpose.
There are broadly three different usages of the term. Firstly, the government plan documents m-id demographic surveys extensively use the term. According to this usage, the unorganised sector is defined rather negatively, is comprising of the labour force that falls outside the organised sector. The organised sector is defined is the one covering labour force employed in 'all the enterprises in the public sector and only the non-agricultural establishments in the private sector employing ... 10 or more workers...' The criterion of 10 is derived from the Factories Act, which covers all the establishments employing 10 or more people. This definition though indicative of the structure of employment fails to qualify each sector, and therefore leaves many questions unanswered. It nonetheless serves the purpose of government planning and projections. Given the fact that unorganised sector accounts for more than 90% of the labour force in the country, the inadequacies of this definition as reflected in the statistical data, appear to be marginal, even though in actual terms the numbers may be very high. Another governmental source, which defines the unorganised
Pranabesh Ray
LABOUR IN THE UNORGANISED SECTOR: ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Sarath Davala
Problems of Definition
The bulk of the Indian labour force is employed in what is loosely referred to as unorganised sector. Most of them are neither organised nor hive any access to social security. Their employment is unprotected, their wages are extremely low, and a large section of them live under conditions below the poverty line. The developmental efforts by the state have done little to improve their living coalitions. This is a matter of concern not only for the trade unions but also for every rational person in this country.
Defining the term 'unorganised sector' is a difficult task indeed. Apart from the conceptual difficulties, the definition also depends on who is defining it and for what purpose.
There are broadly three different usages of the term. Firstly, the government plan documents m-id demographic surveys extensively use the term. According to this usage, the unorganised sector is defined rather negatively, is comprising of the labour force that falls outside the organised sector. The organised sector is defined is the one covering labour force employed in 'all the enterprises in the public sector and only the non-agricultural establishments in the private sector employing ... 10 or more workers...' The criterion of 10 is derived from the Factories Act, which covers all the establishments employing 10 or more people. This definition though indicative of the structure of employment fails to qualify each sector, and therefore leaves many questions unanswered. It nonetheless serves the purpose of government planning and projections. Given the fact that unorganised sector accounts for more than 90% of the labour force in the country, the inadequacies of this definition as reflected in the statistical data, appear to be marginal, even though in actual terms the numbers may be very high. Another governmental source, which defines the unorganised