We are bound to communicate using speech, writing and semiotic modes of communication. These modes rely on a particular circumstance that invites oral or symbolic means to impart the desired messages; and we use discourse for this purpose. Discourse refers to very specific patterns of language that tell us something about the person speaking the language, the culture that person is part of, the network of social institutions that the person caught up in, and even frequently the most basic assumptions that the person holds (Lois 5). Thus, the idea of discourse includes the overall scenario of a fixed setting of a society which depends on globalization, a world in which societies, cultures, politics and economics have, in some sense, come closer together (Kiely and Marfleet 3). Despite their mutual interdependence, the issue of either discourse affects globalization or globalization prepares a platform for the formation of discourse calls upon more arguments from different scholars. This paper presents how a discourse contributes social, linguistic and ideological aspects of globalization. A rhetorical situation determines our actions, dialogues, functional behavior and validity of our performances. A discourse is created provided that a determined context demands for fulfilling the noble goal of an action. The importance of a context for discourse is shown by:
We need to understand that a particular discourse comes into existence because of some specific condition or situation which invites utterance (Bitzer 4). It means a discourse in a context involves an utterance which is what we express. Our expression is revelation of ideas, thoughts and ideologies through which we attempt to maintain cordial relationship with our friends. Until we face a problem, an utterance doesn’t emerge. So, it’s social context where a discourse resides. In one way, it’s social scenario that builds a rigid platform for discourse and the discourse