Preview

Law In The Middle Ages

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law In The Middle Ages
Law In The Middle Ages

Ever wonder how life in the Middle Ages was? Whether its modes of punishment, the court system, Churches, or even medieval justice that played an important role for peasants, nobles, knights, and many more of the important people of the Middle Ages? During the middle ages there were laws people lived by and if broken they would either go to court or battle to survive. There is a variety of courts for different classes and also trials. First of all, there were two types of trials that a person faced for crimes that they committed. Trial by ordeal was when a person's innocence was tested by putting them in a dangerous position having them do a difficult test such as swallowing poison, pulling an object
…show more content…

Moreover, representatives of the lord, called stewards, acted as judges deciding the sentence of the court. Royal courts took care of serious crimes such as murder, treason, rape, burglary, cutting trees or even taking deadwood for fuel from royal forests. Royal courts used the "common law" which was named because it was the same as the whole kingdom. Royal courts could order the execution of murderers and thieves. After the execution of a criminal the court would take away all of his or her property. Lastly, the church was very important to life in the middle ages as well as the laws that people lived by. The church determined much of the culture of Europe, but it was a complex blend of Germanian, Christian, and Roman cultures. The church tried to bring help to the common people, making laws fairer and providing help for the poor in monasteries. In a violent society, dominated by men and warriors, the laws were rough with justice favoring the strong. Much of the barbarian law revolved around superstition and fines of either blood or money would be paid by the guilty. Although the amount would vary depending on the rank of the person

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act Apush

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Admiralty Courts Stamp Act and Sugar Act offenses were tried in this court. Juries were not allowed and the burden of proof was on the defendant. All were assumed to be guilty until proven innocent. Trial by jury and innocent until proven guilty were basic rights that the British people everywhere had held dear.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the Middle Ages. The Middle Ages was a time full of prospering and adjusting for the benefits of society. Many laws and rules were justified to help and overall aid the people of the time. The…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trial by ordeal: accused would carry hot iron or walk on hot coals then they would wrap their wound, if the wounds weren't infected, God had intervened and if they were infected he hadn't…

    • 10202 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Middle Ages Period of wars and mass migration Strong class distinctions – Nobility: castles, knights in armor, feasting – Peasantry: lived in huts, serfs—part of land – Clergy: ruled everyone, only monks literate McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rig…

    • 1806 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabethan Government

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crime and punishment was dealt with harshly in the Elizabethan era. The Queen administered death sentences for high treason. "The most important courts were probably the Great Session (or Assizes), held twice a year in each county, and the Quarter Sessions Court, held four times a year (Thomas)." People were tortured for important information (Mahabal).…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although for the King and Monarch the Feudal System was considered ‘just’, to others it was considered unjust and not fair. Courts in Medieval Europe weren't advanced therefore they didn't have the technology we have nowadays to determine innocence. Medieval Courts didn't have evidence to back up a case. Everyone no matter what in Medieval Europe were ‘guilty until proven innocent’. This was not a sufficient way as there was no evidence to support you if you're proven guilty. Some evidence you could get in which support the accused is for twelve people to swear that the person could not have done what he was accused of. Another example of how they proved their innocence was Trial by Ordeal, Battle, Bread, Fire or Water. In these trials, they would go through a…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When you had put your hand in boiling water or holding and red hot iron you would get a wound. When you had finished your punishment you wound was then bandaged and if it had started to heal after three days then you were innocent if it was clear that the wound was not healing or infected you were guilty. Most of these ordeals are found in India, Asia, America, Europe and parts of Africa. How we knew that there where ordeal by fire and other ordeals, was by the pantings and old books as well. There are also ordeal torture equipment in museums, this is how we know there was ordeals. Based on this it is clear that ordeal by fire was something you had to do to determine if you were innocent or…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medieval Feudalism

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criminals were convicted before either a Manorial court or the King's court. Manorial courts were much like courts today with a jury and generally a just punishment was given that appeared to fit the crime whilst the King’s court used trial by ordeal that has been seen by historians as unjust and theatrical. Ordeals included ordeal by water (where the convicted either drowned and were not guilty or floated and were guilty), ordeal by fire ( the convicted was to hold a poker and burn themselves, if the wound healed in three days they were innocent) and ordeal by combat. Often minor misdeeds resulted in fines, being placed in the stocks or wearing a scolds bridle and severe crimes usually resulted in the loss of limbs, disfigurement, being burned to death, hung, buried alive or executed. Crime and punishment has always been an aspect of society, they existed in Medieval Europe in order to firstly, punish those who broke the law. As well as this punishment often mutilated, embarrassed, ruined people's chance to rise in society and killed people thus it acted as a deterrent – promoting obedience, it prevented serious criminals from committing crimes again (especially if they were convicted of treason) and those who convicted criminals were able to display their authority and power. Justice, deterrent and incapacitation – the three main reasons for its…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aquinas's political and legal theory is important for three reasons. First, it reasserts the value of politics by drawing on Aristotle to argue that politics and political life are morally positive activities that are in accordance with the intention of God for man. Second, it combines traditional hierarchical and feudal views of the structure of society and politics with emerging community-oriented and incipiently egalitarian views of the proper ordering of society. Third, it develops an integrated and logically coherent theory of natural law that continues to be an important source of legal, political, and moral norms.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the 13th century the primary function of justice during this century was getting revenge in other parts of the world in the same century made attempts to establish law and order in countries, such as Greece, Rome, and Egypt (NCWC, 2004). From 1066-1285 the Frankpledge of this time was the only system of justice in the English-speaking world (NCWC, 2004). The Frankpledge system went by another name as well its name was the tithing system, which was the same as tithing in church. This system was to take 10% of household earnings every Sunday, and a community of 10 separate households had the obligation to control its own law and order.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laity In The Middle Ages

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this part of Lumen Gentium there are several terms that come to mind. The Laity which are the ordinary people who attend church. Testimonies, which are stories about how God made a change in your life. Or the term evangelical, that is transdenominational movement of Protestant Christianity. The laity’s secular nature can be seen through christian activities and their profession. They can be ordained in ministry. Also in their life, the spirit leads them and their soul in life is woven. The chosen people of God are all a part of ne faith in the this world. We all serve one Lord and are interconnected through baptism. Everyone as christians aren’t unique because of rac or sex. Everybody must be nonresistant members of the living faith. Which…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Ginat (2009:65) a trial by ordeal is when the accused party is subjected to a severe, dangerous…

    • 2838 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crimes that jurors believed to necessitate a more thorough investigation would be investigated for a longer period of time. The jurors essentially determined the level of detail of the investigation. This gave the jury the ability to make a personal decision of guilt or innocence based on how they felt about the accused. Langbein continues, writing, “In an eerie way, therefore, adjudication in Chancery wound up replacing the fundamental failing of common law procedure: Chancery procedure isolated the judge from the facts. Delegation of functions by an overburdened Chancellor came to have much of the same effect that bifurcation had produced in medieval common law. other were systems of adjudication in which the judge was unable to adjudicate fact.” The judge virtually held no power in a system with a self-informed jury. Therefore, the juries of medieval England were able to decide for themselves the guilt or innocence of the accused based purely on their understanding of right and wrong, as well as their understanding of the law itself. In this sesne, juries were able to determine to society which crimes were more likely to get harsher punishments. This, in turn, led to a set of social norms that was…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court system in the middle ages worked by using the term “guilty until proven innocent” and using trials of ordeal to determine innocence. The courts weren't based on the idea of an accused being innocent until proven guilty as there was no concept to believe the accused was innocent. It was the job of the accused to prove their innocence. The accused could do this by taking an oath to prove their innocence. The accused would also be required bring oath helpers, these helpers would normally know the person very well.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the dark, Middle Ages came a time period of renewed interests in things of the world such as education, art, literature, and science. This period was called the Renaissance. During the Renaissance, education was a common goal for people and the result of this made people more knowledgeable in subjects such as the liberal arts. It also took on a movement of thought and action concerned with human interest and values which was called humanism. The printing press would become one of the most key components of getting the word out to people about new discoveries and advances.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics