2. The director interview provides more than enough detail for later analysis.
3. The analysis of the interview was very detailed in that it provided resources used and answers all of the criteria requested.
4. No spelling errors were noted but one small error was annotated in the body of the paper. The template was followed and the sources were cited correctly.
5. The one area for improvement could be more personal experiences to support leadership philosophy. The positive is that the author does an admirable job of tying the interview to their personal leadership philosophy.