Preview

Legal Brief: Pennsylvania State Police V. Suders

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1042 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Brief: Pennsylvania State Police V. Suders
Legal Brief: Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
Facts:
• Pennsylvania State Police hired Nancy Drew Suders as a police communications operator.
• Suder’s supervisors were Sergeant Eric D. Easton, Patrol Corporal William D. Baker, and Corporal Eric B. Prendergast.
• Suders was subject to sexual harassment from all three of her supervisors during the term of her employment.
• Easton would mention the subject of people having sex with animals each time Suders entered the office.
• Easton told fellow supervisor, Prendergast in front of Suders that young girls should be taught how to give men oral sex.
• Easton would sit near Suders with spandex shorts and spread his legs apart.
• Baker made obscene gestures which involved grabbing his genitals and shouting out a vulgar comment inviting oral sex. He would make this gesture 5-10 times per night throughout Suder’s employment.
• Baker would also rub his rear end in front of Suder and remark, “I have a nice ass, don’t I?”
• Suder’s contacted Virginia Smith-Elliot, PSP’s equal opportunity officer, five months after being hired stating that she was being harassed at work and was afraid.
• Smith-Elliot’s response came across as insensitive and unhelpful to Suder’s.
• Two days later Suder’s resigned from the force.
• She decided to sue PSP alleging that she had been subject to sexual harassment and constructively discharged and forced to resign.
• The U.S. District Court held that although evidence was sufficient to conclude that Suder’s supervisors engaged in sexual harassment, PSP was not vicariously liable for the supervisors’ conduct.
• The U.S. Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for trial on the merits against PSP. PSP appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue: Can an employer be held vicariously liable when the sexual harassment conduct of its employees is so severe that the victim of the harassment resigns?
Rule of Law: As per title VII of the civil rights of 1969, creating a hostile and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rother's leadership assumed that he was with 1/10 and continued to report "all present" at an all hands…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Aiello vs United Air Lines, Inc ., the court of appeal, following the previous ruling in favor of the Aiello (the plaintiff), held that the appellee had been wrongly discharged. This was inconsideration of the fact that another employee, under similar circumstances, had not been discharged. In Ms. Granbury’s case, the fact that the personnel committee had granted other employees a chance for review meant a specific way of treatment that should have been the same…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is hoe employees should handle situations similar to Ms. Deters. The same thing can happen to males just as it does to females, women obtaining higher positions in the work place are also guilty of taking advantage because of their rank. This case relates to one over Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in which they refuse to hire women for higher position in the business. In the case discussed above Ms. Deters was discriminated also because she was not a “revenue producer.” This case can be related to many degrees of discrimination and will sufficiently shape future…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 520 Week 5 Assignment

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Based on the given facts, she was the subject of jokes in her work place as she was being picked on based on her gender. Since she was the only woman in her department, the male employees subject her to cruel and mean jokes on several occasion when other workers placed a sign on a truck that stated "Hardhat Required/Bra Optional”. This is clearly an illustration that she is working in a hostile environment since the repeated jokes made on her gender has created an intimidating place of work. The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is applicable to Pollard where the Supreme Court ruled that hostile work environment sex discrimination is an actionable wrong under Title VII. The fact that the Vice President of the bank made sexual advances against complainant created a hostile work environment and is a form of a sexual harassment covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The severe and pervasive conduct of the vice president who repeated sexually abused on the victim in exchange for sexual favors at the office qualify the acts as punishable under Title VII. Here, the acts of the Teddy’s workers against Pollard constitute Hostile Work Environment (HWE) sexual harassment through the vulgar sexual jokes and…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. After retiring in November of 1998, she began her suit against the company citing a Title VII pay discrimination claim along with a claim under the Equal Pay Act…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rjdt Task-1

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malika Curry, Aggrieved Party, (AP) alleged that she was discriminated against based on reprisal for a union grievance, Color and Disability as evidenced by the following:…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williamson V Houston

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Principle of Law: A supervisor’s knowledge of harassing behavior can be imputed to an organization to show that the organization knew of the harassing behavior and can therefore be held liable for failing to stop the behavior. 7. Analysis: This case addresses whether an organization can be held liable for things that an employee (specifically, a supervisor) knows or does. In this specific case, the issue was a supervisor’s knowledge of sexual harassment of an employee. Presumably, however, the supervisor’s knowledge could be of any number of troubling issues regarding employees from negligence, to theft, to drunk driving. The Appeals Court in this case did not focus on the clearly disturbing behavior of the harasser. Instead, they focused on the defendant’s (the city’s) claim that they could not be held liable because knowledge of the harassing behavior on the part of the officer’s supervisor did not constitute knowledge on the part of the city. The court dismissed this claim. One of the issues discussed at length by the court had to do with the rank of the supervisor who had knowledge of the harassing behavior. The city claimed that the supervisor, Sgt. Bozeman, was not considered “upper management” by the department. The court cited another decision from the 7th Circuit (Young v Bayer Corp., 123 F.3d 672, 673-75, 1997) which stated that the labels attached to different levels or organizational hierarchy were not important; rather, the important consideration is to…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Also, in sexual harassment cases, an organization can be held liable for sexual harassment actions by its managers, employees, and even customers…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    countered the prank they tried to do to him at the bakery, his "friends" got mad…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, volume 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (1); states in pertinent part:…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this case, Burce’s action was kind of a sexual harassment when he humiliated Sue in the staff lunchroom.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Mr. Haddad’s behavior had gone beyond, in a manner that was interpreted to be more aggressive than the company’s definition of sexual harassment then an immediate termination would be warranted. To make a clear cut determine based on the facts presented whether Mr. Haddad should immediately be terminated or not would be a matter for further study. The facts are premature at best.…

    • 752 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court further reasoned that even though Peterson was written after the trial court made its decision, it is still controlling for 2 reasons. First, as the check at issue was signed in…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays