Preview

Leo Szilard Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leo Szilard Summary
The author of “A PETITION TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES” Leo Szilard discusses why he believes the use of atomic bombs is one of last resort. In this petition Szilard uses his first hand knowledge and expertise to provide good points throughout the petition. Szilard working in the field of nuclear energy; suggested that the use of such a weapon would only open the door to the development of more weapons of its caliber. Within this critical evaluation essay I will show why I believe Leo Szilard, although it didn’t work, pitched a successful argument towards not using nuclear weapons during the war with Japan.
Leo Szilard made an ethical appeal in an attempt to convince the audience of his credibility as the author. Szilard was an expert
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comparing The War Against Jap Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb '
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The War Against Jap Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb '

    The first option would allow President Truman to end the war peacefully, and it would have also allowed the Japanese to withdraw from the war without shame to their leader and save the thousands of Japanese individuals by not making the United States have to make the choice of dropping the atomic bombs. This option would have let Truman show that “We as Americans have not sunk to the level of our enemies” “We should end the war now in a manner that reflects the value we place on the sanctity of human life and the dignity of the individual”. The author gives Truman a second option and this option approaches the war in the Pacific with a demonstration of the atomic bomb in efforts to force the Japanese to surrender without condition. This includes the uprising of the Manhattan Project which gave the United States the “weapon of almost inconceivable power” with the scare tactics of the demonstration this gives the Japanese leaders an idea of what would…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did Harry S. Truman Dropped The Atomic Bomb?
    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did Harry S. Truman Dropped The Atomic Bomb?

    After years of war and destruction, American soldiers and civilians were beyond weary and restless, yet the Japanese were steadfast and refused to give up their fight. Sworn in as the 33rd United States president, after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s sudden death, Harry S. Truman presided over the end of WWII. When Truman learned of the success of the “Manhattan Project” he knew that he was faced with a decision of unparalleled gravity. He was well aware that the capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, however, he was also aware that it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon the world had ever known. July 26, 1945 President Truman, United Kingdom Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Government Chiang Kaishek, released the Potsdam Declaration.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Harry Truman Wrong
    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Was Harry Truman Wrong

    Harry Truman was a president who volunteered in WW1. Harry Truman was born in Missouri on May 8, 1884. He was commonly known for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan, which caused many casualties with lives being lost on both sides such as in Japan and the U.S., however this ended the war even faster and ended the conflict with the pacific. In this paper I will argue that Harry Truman was wrong for dropping the atomic bomb on Japan; several reasons why it was wrong for Harry Truman to drop the atomic bomb was Russia got the idea of making nuclear weapons, Japan’s resources were already being wiped out and the amount of civilian casualties Japan had due to the bomb and radiation.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Butow's Argument Analysis
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Butow's Argument Analysis

    Butow’s research on Marcus Kido’s influence on the emperor to accept terms that presented “peace and honor,” influences Feis’ argument. Feis claims that Kido’s ability to persuade Hirohito was crucial in moving Japan towards the choice to surrender. Feis takes a different approach to Butow’s thoughts on Kido’s efforts to surrender; with the understanding that the Japanese public would only end the war if the United States allowed the country to keep the emperor. Investigating Butow’s original claims, Feis identifies that the United States would not move from its demands for unconditional surrender. He argues that due to the country’s internal struggles, Japan directly prolonged the war. Feis argument allows him to question if the United States had not used the atomic bomb would Japan had surrender assembled in August 1945. This approach to history from a military aspect moved the topic of the decision to surrender in a new direction. Feis presents the question of whether the atomic bombs played an essential role in the decision-making that led to the Japanese’s surrender. Feis concludes his arguments by presenting the idea that Japan’s decision to surrender came from the threat that if the war lasted any longer, the United States would use a third atomic bomb. The author broadens the study of Japan’s decision through the understanding that the United States used the atomic bombs as a means to motivate Japan to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did Harry S. Truman Use An Atomic Bomb?
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did Harry S. Truman Use An Atomic Bomb?

    Over the past several years, working in secret, some of the greatest minds in science had developed a weapon. A bomb that could level cities, a bomb that changed the basic power of the universe, an atom bomb. Truman now had a choice before him: unleash this new weapon in an attempt to force Japan to surrender or commit the United States to a massive invasion of the Japanese…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    If The Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used Rhetorical Analysis
    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If The Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used Rhetorical Analysis

    Karl T. Compton builds his argument in hopes to appeal to the audience's emotional standpoint or pathos. Compton’s use of pathos was evident on the first page third paragraph in which he wrote “ I believe, that the atomic bombs saved hundreds of thousands- perhaps several millions- of lives, both American and Japanese..” This specific quote justifies the act of the droppings of these bombs because he is implying that the bombings were not wrongful.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bombs
    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bombs

    President Truman was justified in using atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. As commander-in Chief of US Armed forces, President Truman was responsible for the men and women in harms way. Americans and Japanese were dying, suffering life-altering injuries and experiencing torture and deprivation in prison camps each day the war raged. Additionally, it is important to look at the cultural elements of Japan, , the possible invasion of Japan, and the American morale during this time, when addressing the justification of Truman's decision.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justification Behind Detonation of Nuclear Bombs
    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Justification Behind Detonation of Nuclear Bombs

    As of May 8, 1945, the conflict in Europe has come to a halt. We are now on track to eliminate the threat that the Japanese pose to our democracy and our ways of life. Since Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 we have lost over 100,000 soldiers in an attempt to secure our position in the pacific. This loss of American life in the pacific combined with the causalities suffered in Europe has been far too great. Japanese soldiers and government show no sign of surrender, or an indication that they are willing to surrender. Despite the obviously devastating effect a nuclear bomb would have on innocent people, all options must be assessed in order to preserve American lives. It is clear from communicating with Japanese diplomats located in Portugal that unconditional surrender is not a…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Potsdam Declaration Argumentative Essay
    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Potsdam Declaration Argumentative Essay

    My fellow leaders and advisors held exceedingly ambivalent views, when our American Allies first issued the Potsdam Declaration late July. They demanded unconditional surrender of all our armed forces! If this wasn’t disreputable enough, they threatened imminent and complete destruction of not only our forces, but they insured absolute devastation of our homeland if we failed to comply with their egregious policy! One consequential condition declared on the Potsdam Declaration undoubtedly resonated with me personally and many other leaders and advisors. The declaration specified “elimination for all of the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    As the 33rd President of the United States, Harry S. Truman was unwillingly thrown into the stressful demand of ushering the lives of Americans through a gruesome world war. With bodies dropping at every attack, Truman erroneously believed that the only way to save thousands was to kill millions. Sadly, this world war’s pressure caused this abominable leader to make the gratuitous decision to drop a ghastly atomic bomb on the innocent people of Hiroshima. President Truman’s imprudent decision to squander the atomic bomb against the Japanese city of Hiroshima was pure butchery, was the result of his vulgar racism towards other nations, and was immorally unnecessary.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Truth On If The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was Necessary
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Truth On If The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was Necessary

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dialectical Reasoning Essay
    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dialectical Reasoning Essay

    In this day and age, many may acknowledge the very controversial issue of technology for peace. This subject is so debated because nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the world as we know it. However, they are essential if we are to protect ourselves. We need to have them, because almost anybody can gain control of them and become a threat. Mutually Assured Destruction insures that both sides need to have weapons of mass destruction to prevent a nuclear war. The use of human soldiers to make peace is too great a risk, and not worth it. With such treacherous weapons as these, it is crucial that we make all the right decisions, but we must also give the world some credit and acknowledge the fact that people have learnt from their mistakes, like what happened in Japan, and nobody wants that to happen again. It is imperative that we have these arms because the technology is already out there and almost anyone can obtain them, Mutually Assured Destruction insures that as long as both sides have them then nobody will strike, and the risk of human casualties is too great and not worth it.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hiroshima Outline
    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hiroshima Outline

    A. Restate Thesis: Clearly the atomic bombing of Japan was justified because of the tremendous amount of lives, both Japanese and American, which would have been lost in a conventional invasion. The Japanese fighting style also precipitated the need for drastic measures to be taken to bring…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics